Archive for December 1st, 2008

Nicole Kidman Bullied On Facebook

Monday, December 1st, 2008

I don’t know why. I am completely indifferent as to whether Kidman’s acting skills are bad, very bad or indeed the worst in the world. And I don’t know what a crazy pill is supposed to be.

But I was not entirely surprised it existed - Facebookers are inherently unpleasant and Kidman has always polarised people.

What was something of a shock was to discover just how spoilt for choice anti-Kidman campaigners are. Type “Nicole” and “Kidman” into a Facebook search and you’re confronted with the horrible, disturbing, catty world of Kidman haters.

For every fan group there is at least one “So over Nicole Kidman” or “No wonder Tom Cruise is crazy and Keith drinks” group. Or nastier: “Nicole Kidman is Satan”, “Nicole Kidman Looks Like An Alien With Foetal Alcohol Syndrome” or just plain “I hate Nicole Kidman” groups.

And they are feral - men and women violently attacking a woman they have most likely never met or know personally.

They don’t just not like Nicole Kidman but are so filled with loathing and spite they are inspired to digitally alter photos so she looks 100 years old or attack her entirely innocent newborn baby - pages and pages of that malicious looniness bloggers are renowned for.

“She is manipulative, calculating and two faced!” said Avi Aronstan.

“Nicole = Bland,” said another and “she has the emotional scope of a spoon and she’s ugly”, Jarrod Booth wrote. And that’s the printable stuff.

But the sport of Kidman-hating has hit a grubby new low, not to mention reached greater audiences than online chatrooms in recent weeks as movie reviewers take unprecedented personal swipes at the actress on the back of the release of Australia.

In one of the many brutal reviews she is labelled “frozen, brittle and vapid”, in another she is “glacial” and there’s the standard “ice queen” barb running through many.

Cutting even deeper, one reviewer unfairly blames her “baby brain” for what he describes as an “overpaid” performance.

Melanie Reid, a columnist with The Times in Britain has been by far the most stinging.

“Australia the movie has one huge problem: it stars Nicole Kidman,” Reid wrote.

“She’s one of the most overrated actors in the world, a woman who has been the kiss of death in practically every movie she has starred in” she wrote.

They are at a loss to explain why this successful Aussie export attracts such vicious personal attack - at home and abroad - but the worst of which is in her own backyard.

Some commentators blame the roles she’s played. Some blame her apparent lack of relationship with her adopted children Conor or Isabella.

They say it’s a tall poppy or a jealousy thing, a Tom Cruise or Scientology thing. Something about red hair, lanky legs or arched eyebrows.

I think all of the above. But I also think these latest attacks on Kidman are even more meaningless than any of that - I think it’s just a case of momentum.

In the frenzy of the online world where people feed off each other and spite breeds spite, Kidman is caught up in an unofficial game of bullying.

Only with what could be the performance of her career on the cards, the timing couldn’t be worse.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Related posts

Best Supporting Actress Contenders Breakdown

Monday, December 1st, 2008

I recently proclaimed 2008 one of the worst movie years in recent memory and I stand by that statement (so far). And let’s be honest, it’s never an outstanding year as far as actresses are concerned. I know it’s Thanksgiving and we should be happy with what we have, but actresses have had very little to be thankful for. Hollywood does a very good job supplying fun and interesting roles for the guys, but not so much for the gals. The Best Supporting Actress category looks especially dry this year. No real standouts yet. But I must admit that while it is late in the year, it is still pretty early in terms of the Oscar season.

Penelope Cruz received strong reviews a few months ago in Woody Allen’s Vicky Cristina Barcelona. Now it’s not like the buzz has been persistent but when you consider the fact that Woody still has some clout with the Academy and the Academy is desperate for strong contenders in this category, Cruz almost seems like a shoe-in. Welcome to the world of Best Supporting Actress.

It’s been a long, strange ride for Marisa Tomei, but she’s really put it together the past few years. I have yet to see The Wrestler, and it’s not like the buzz on Tomei is amazing, but people seem to like how she’s aging in her career. They also seem to like the movie a great deal so it would not surprise me at all to find Tomei on the ballot.

Doubt is an interesting movie for this category. Meryl Streep commands leading actress prestige, whether or not she has more screen time than her co-star Amy Adams (remember Streep somehow was nominated Best Actress for The Devil Wears Prada despite being more of a supporting player). So she’s out in this category. Amy Adams has been on my radar for a Supporting Actress nomination and there’s a good chance that’ll still be on target. Viola Davis, that wonderful actress from Solaris and Antwone Fisher, has been gaining steam lately for the same movie, making Doubt perhaps the most intriguing Oscary movie for female actors. Any chance three ladies get a nod here? Anything is possible.

No tag for this post.

Related posts

Archives

December 2008
M T W T F S S
« Nov    
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  

Other

Syndication


website statistic