Bush, Colombia and Narco-Politics

by André–Ÿ Cala

(Consortium News)[Editor's Note: On March 1,

Colombian armed forces crossed into Ecuador to kill 24 leftist

Colombian guerrillas, including a senior commander, Raul Reyes. The

attack touched off a confrontation pitting Colombia against Ecuador and

Venezuela, which condemned the violation of Ecuador's sovereignty and

noted that Reyes was a key figure in negotiations over prisoner

releases and a possible reduction in political tensions.

The

Bush administration defended Colombia's right to attack terrorists

even if that requires crossing a border, a position echoed by this

year's presidential candidates, including Hillary Clinton and Barack

Obama. Indeed, from the opinion circles of Washington, there was almost

no criticism of Colombian President Alvaro Uribe although his inner

circle has long been linked to both right-wing terrorism and cocaine

trafficking.

Last

August, journalist Andres Cala examined the new evidence about Uribe's

ties to this dark underworld of Latin American violence. We are

republishing that special report below:]

George

W. Bush strategy of countering Venezuela leftist president Hugo

Ch醰ez by strengthening ties to Colombia rightist government has been

undercut by fresh evidence of high-level drug corruption and human

rights violations implicating President Alvaro Uribe inner circle. These new allegations about Colombia

narco-politics have tarnished Uribe reputation just as Bush has been

showcasing the Harvard- and Oxford-educated politician as a paragon of

democratic values and an alternative to the firebrand Ch醰ez, who has

used Venezuela oil wealth to finance social programs for the poor

across the region.

Despite the corruption disclosures ?and Uribe failure to stem

Colombian cocaine smuggling to the United States ?the Bush

administration continues to shower Uribe government with trade

incentives and billions of dollars in military and development aid.

With other regional leaders unwilling to side with the United States

against Ch醰ez, Bush may see little alternative but to stay the course

with the 55-year-old Uribe and hope Colombia corruption doesn draw

too much attention in the United States or across South America.

Ironically, the latest evidence against Uribe government emerged from

a U.S.-backed peace process that offered leniency to right-wing

paramilitary death squads and their financial backers in exchange for

giving up their guns and disclosing past crimes.

The right-wing paramilitaries and their cocaine-trafficking benefactors

testified that elements of the Colombian government collaborated in a

decade-long scorched-earth campaign that killed almost 10,000 civilians

while seeking to dislodge a leftist guerrilla army known as the

Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia, or FARC.

The confessions include blood-soaked tales of political murders,

cocaine smuggling and staggering government corruption. As a result,

dozens of former and current congressmen, governors, government

ministers, military officers, prominent business leaders and

multinational corporations are being investigated or have been arrested.

This so-called ara-scandal?revealed that a counterinsurgency force,

known as the United Self-Defence Forces of Colombia, or AUC,

collaborated with drug lords to control the cocaine trade and

simultaneously worked with Colombia elites, including Uribe family,

to fend off the guerrilla threat.

Another troubling offshoot of the peace process was the creation of a

safe haven for drug lords, who flocked to a 370-square-kilometer

sanctuary set up for the AUC.

Colombian mafia boss Fabio Enrique Ochoa Vasco, 47, who was indicted in

Florida in September 2004 for drug trafficking and money laundering,

claimed he was one of 10 U.S.-wanted traffickers who found protection

in the Santa Fe Ralito sanctuary.

AUC leaders romised to include their financial backers in the

negotiation?as a way to shield alleged cocaine traffickers from

extradition to the United States, Ochoa Vasco told a Colombian magazine

in June.

It was all

prearranged in 2001, according to paramilitary and drug lord accounts.

If Uribe won the presidency, paramilitary leaders would be offered

generous sentence reductions and be allowed to serve their time outside

prison walls if they demobilized and confessed.

Ochoa Vasco, who allegedly ships eight tons of cocaine monthly to the

United States, was told that he and other AUC allies would be sentenced

in Colombia to a maximum of 12 years, rather than face possible life

sentences in U.S. prisons.

Uribe History

The new disclosures also have brought back to public attention the

Uribe family long history of ties to drug lords and paramilitary

militias. Colombia Supreme Court announced in July that it was

investigating Senator Mario Uribe, the president cousin and his point

man in the Colombian Congress, for alleged links to the AUC.

Several paramilitary leaders have said Mario Uribe was one of their

allies and an intermediary with the government. He has denied any

wrongdoing.

But the family

link to purported drug lords dates back several decades. As a young man

and an aspiring politician, ç¾–varo Uribe lost his position as mayor of

Medell韓 ?after only five months on the job ?because the country

president ousted him over his family suspected connections to

traffickers, according to media reports at the time.

His father Alberto Uribe, a wealthy landowner, reputedly had been a

close associate of the Medell韓 cartel and its kingpins, such as Pablo

Escobar and the Ochoa brothers, who were personal friends.

In 1983, Alberto Uribe was reportedly wanted by the U.S. government for

drug trafficking when he was killed in a kidnapping attempt by the

FARC. According to media accounts, his body was airlifted back to his

family by one of Escobar helicopters.

In the early 1990s, ç¾–varo Uribe brother, Santiago, was investigated

for allegedly organizing and leading a paramilitary militia that was

headquartered at the Uribe family hacienda. He was never charged and

the case was dismissed for lack of evidence. But Santiago was

photographed alongside Fabio Ochoa at a party even after the government

had declared Ochoa one of the most notorious Medell韓 cartel kingpins.

The incident with Santiago Uribe coincided with ç¾–varo Uribe eight

years in the Senate, where he opposed extradition of drug suspects. His

critics accused him of working for the Medell韓 cartel.

But the relationship between right-wing narco-financed paramilitaries

and the Colombian government has been a long and complex one, with

shifting alliances based on the self-interest of the moment.

In 1992, the Drug Enforcement Administration, the CIA and the U.S.

military, along with Colombian intelligence services, joined forces

with the Cali cartel to train, equip and coordinate an undercover group

of mercenaries known as the Pepes, an acronym for Persecuted by Pablo

Escobar. Among its leaders was Carlos Casta駉, who would later run the

AUC.

Systematically, the

Pepes assassinated Escobar top henchmen and their families, finally

killing Escobar himself in 1993. The Pepes then split up. Some went on

to create their own drug empires, while Casta駉 built a paramilitary

army financed by rich landowners and drug dealers.

Since the war on Escobar organization, Casta駉 and the Cali cartel ?
as well as Colombian military officers ?have claimed that they work

side by side with U.S. agencies, but U.S. authorities have denied such

an alliance.

The alienation

from Washington widened in 1994 when President Ernesto Samper came to

power amid disclosures that his campaign had received generous

donations from drug cartels. President Bill Clinton cut most aid and

severed some military support to Colombia because of Samper ties to

drug traffickers.

With less

U.S. aid, the Colombian army was unable to contain the FARC and coca

acreage soared. Colombia rulers responded with the creation of

paramilitary militias that used terror to reduce popular support for

the guerrillas.

The Samper

government pushed what was known as the Convivir project. It armed,

trained and organized local defence cooperatives to provide pecial

private security and vigilance services?alongside the armed forces,

creating another cover for right-wing paramilitary forces.

Rise of Uribe

Alvaro Uribe political rise was tied to the success of Convivir. In

1995, Uribe became the governor of Antioquia, a north-western district

with Medell韓 as the capital.

Uribe was the country most vocal supporter of the defence

cooperatives, authorizing dozens of them with almost 20 of these

Uribe-backed cooperatives run by paramilitary leaders, including the

AUC current top commander, Salvatore Mancuso. [Casta駉, who operated

in a different state, wasn one of them.]

Casta駉 is quoted in a biography as saying Uribe was the presidential candidate of the AUC social support base.

揇eep

down, he the closest man to our philosophy,?Casta駉 said, adding

that Uribe support for the Convivir was grounded on the same

principle that gave rise to paramilitarism in Colombia, the right to

self-defence against guerrillas.

When confronted with accusations of complicity between Convivir and

drug-connected paramilitaries, Uribe said that at the time nobody knew

who the right-wing leaders and the cocaine traffickers were.

After an international outcry, however, the government slowly phased

out Convivir. By the time it was outlawed in 1998, however, over 200

defence cooperatives, counting thousands of men, defied the order to

demobilize and joined Casta駉 new paramilitary alliance, the AUC.

The Convivir project had other long-term consequences. Beyond

establishing and arming paramilitary militias, the project created a

web of cooperation between Colombia military and right-wing death

squads. Some paramilitary leaders, such as Casta駉, claimed the CIA and

DEA also gave the AUC discreet support.

At least two top paramilitary commanders have claimed that the

Colombian military coordinated counterinsurgency operations with the

AUC.

揑 am living proof of state-sponsored paramilitarism in Colombia,?said the AUC Mancuso in his deposition earlier this year.

The AUC leaders have named several high-ranking Colombian officers as

collaborating with the paramilitaries, including former General Rito

Alejo del Rio, Antioquia commanding officer during Uribe

governorship.

While running

for the presidency in 2002, Uribe cited the perceived success of the

Convivir program in damaging the FARC infrastructure in Antioquia as

a key reason why Colombians should vote for him.

Despite the drug suspicions ?and the links to paramilitary death

squads ?Uribe benefited from public disenchantment with a sputtering

peace process that had failed to end the civil war. Uribe emerged as

the winner with 53 percent of the vote.

After Uribe election, several drug barons claimed they had financed

his campaign. Indicted drug trafficker Ochoa Vasco said he contributed

$150,000 of his own money at the AUC request.

Ochoa Vasco also said he witnessed a conversation between the AUC

leaders and supposed representatives of Uribe campaign before the

election.

hey talked about

the peace process,?Ochoa Vasco said. hey said anyone with problems

with the U.S. could get involved. And in another meeting, there were

businessmen, landowners and drug traffickers who [the AUC] thought they

could also include, so they told them to get ready for the peace

process.?/p>

All the

paramilitary leaders who negotiated the peace agreement 搆now the

truth. They know that to be there, they invested more than 10 million

dollars,?Ochoa Vasco said.

Government negotiations with the AUC began four months after Uribe took

office. Casta駉 repositioned himself as an opponent of the drug

corruption that, by then, clearly pervaded the AUC. He resigned as AUC

military leader.

In April

2004, Casta駉 was ambushed by 20 elite paramilitaries following orders

from the AUC top leaders. He was shot almost two dozen times in the

face, chopped into pieces, and burned.

Surviving AUC leaders and drug traffickers said Casta駉 was killed

because he was negotiating his surrender to the DEA along with all

trafficking information about the AUC and its government and military

allies. U.S. authorities have denied any negotiation.

Uribe-Bush Alliance

Meanwhile, Uribe lined up solidly behind President George W. Bush by

becoming the only South American leader to endorse Bush invasion of

Iraq. Uribe also sought more U.S. military aid as he defined the civil

war against the leftist FARC as part of the 揼lobal war on terror.?

The backbone of U.S. policy in Colombia is Plan Colombia, a mostly

military aid program to fight both drug production and irregular

armies, most notably the FARC and the AUC. Since 2001, Washington has

sent over $5 billion to Bogot?

Nonetheless, Plan Colombia put little dent in cocaine production. The

coca acreage in 2006 was slightly more than in 2001, when Plan Colombia

was implemented. Acreage was reduced in 2003 and 2004 but shot up again

in 2005 and 2006.

But

Uribe success in curbing political violence boosted his popularity in

Colombia. He vigorously pressed the war against the FARC, forcing the

leftist guerrillas into a tactical retreat. Overall, Uribe reduced the

number of murders, kidnappings and massacres by about one-third.

The Uribe-controlled Congress also passed the Justice and Peace Law,

which launched a peace process with the right-wing paramilitaries that

demobilized 30,000 men and women. The law was written by Sen. Mario

Uribe, the cousin now being investigated for his AUC ties. Even the

Bush administration criticized the law terms as overly lenient.

With Uribe popularity soaring, he got his congressional allies to

change the Constitution to permit a second presidential term. Uribe

then swept to reelection in 2006, winning 62 percent of the vote.

Still, accusations of corruption and unpunished human rights violations dogged him.

Several investigations, especially those led by Colombia Supreme

Court, slowly amassed evidence against former and current government

officials and prominent figures among the country elite.

Those implicated included dozens of current and former members of the

Congress; high-ranking military officers, including the current chief

of staff; entire army battalions allegedly working for drug cartels;

prominent businessmen; and some of Uribe closest allies, including

the father and brother of Colombia former foreign minister Mar韆

Consuelo Ara鷍o.

In March

2006, a laptop belonging to a top paramilitary leader was seized in a

raid. The computer was found to contain detailed information on

drug-trafficking operations, killings committed during the peace

process, potential hit lists of other victims, the AUC plan for

influencing the government, and a list of contributors and political

allies.

One of the hit

lists was linked to Colombia intelligence service and to its

director, Jorge Noguera, a close Uribe ally who the president named

consul in Milan after the initial investigation was opened.

Noguera was later arrested for his ties to the AUC and drug

traffickers, for filtering information to the AUC, for erasing

incriminating evidence of several drug traffickers and paramilitary

leaders, for complicity in the assassinations of several union leaders,

and for obstructing operations to capture his allies.

Other Colombian intelligence officials also were arrested, including

one high-level official, Rafael Garc韆, who testified that he erased

evidence at the request of Noguera. Garc韆 also accused Noguera of

plotting to assassinate Venezuela president Ch醰ez in coordination

with high-level officials in Uribe administration, though Garc韆

didn give their names.

Paramilitary leader Mancuso also accused Uribe Defence Minister Juan

Manuel Santos in his deposition of plotting with the AUC to kill

Venezuela Ch醰ez, although it not clear whether Santos was one of

the men whom intelligence officer Garc韆 was referring to. Santos

denied the accusation.

Then,

in December 2006, embarrassed by the ongoing criminality in the AUC

Santa Fe Ralito safe haven, the government put some paramilitary

leaders in prison. But even there, they continued to live the high life

and kept on top of their criminal operations.

The local press published in May transcripts of police wiretaps

revealing AUC leaders continuing to order killings and to direct drug

trafficking from prison, while also enjoying dance parties, sexual

orgies and alcohol. They hosted 揗exican friends?and had unrestricted

access to cell phones and the Internet.

In one conversation, the frustrated former prison warden complained to

a colleague that her orders were constantly overruled by her superiors

when paramilitary leaders called to complain to the peace commissioner,

government ministers and even the president. The warden soon requested

to be relocated.

Infuriated by the wiretap disclosures, Uribe ordered the firing of the

top 12 generals in the police, but he said little about the evidence of

AUC criminality beyond promising another investigation.

AUC leaders also threatened to break off the peace process, accusing

the government of changing the terms. They felt betrayed, they said,

and threatened to incriminate all their elite allies, including

politicians, businessmen, and multinationals.

Regional Trouble

The Organization of American States, which has overseen the peace

process with the AUC, has been critical of the results. The OAS warned

that the paramilitaries are rearming and reorganizing under different

names, with stronger ties to drug traffickers, and are being led by

some of the same leaders who supposedly had surrendered.

OAS Assistant Secretary General Albert Ramdin said this year that the

AUC demobilization process might well fail to solve Colombia problem

with drug-financed paramilitary groups.

Colombia approach 揷ould trigger a truth and justice process that

would put an end to paramilitary groups in the regions, and lead to

reconstruction of the State,?Ramdin said. 揙r, on the other hand, it

could accentuate the influence of paramilitary groups linked to drug

trafficking.?

Despite

Colombia problems ?the corruption, the shaky peace process and the

shortcomings of its anti-drug program ?Bush has continued to show

unstinting support for Uribe. Calling Uribe a true democrat and a

strong leader, Bush has visited Colombia twice, including earlier this

year, and met with Uribe several times in Washington.

揑抦

proud to call [Uribe] a friend and strategic ally,?Bush said during

one of Uribe visits. In Bogot? the U.S. president said: 揑

appreciate the [Colombian] president determination to bring human

rights violators to justice. ?I believe that, given a fair chance,

President Uribe can make the case.?

Bush asked the U.S. Congress to increase financial support for Plan

Colombia, but Democrats cut military aid from 80 percent to 65 percent

of the total allocation, while increasing economic and humanitarian

aid. Moreover, the Democrats attached strict conditions on the total

$530 million.

Democrats

also have conditioned their ratification of a free-trade agreement with

Colombia on Uribe improving the country human rights record and

prosecuting paramilitary leaders.

In South America, Uribe has slowly backed himself into a corner by

siding with Bush. While most South American countries have grown more

critical of U.S. foreign policy and its Free Trade Agreement of the

Americas, Colombia has staunchly supported Bush policies, distancing

itself from its neighbors.

Brazil and Ecuador have closer relations with Venezuela, as do most

countries in the region, in stark contrast to a decade ago. Colombia

has been kept out of South America Mercosur regional trade union,

while Venezuela is expected to join sometime this year.

Uribe also has lost some regional backing in his fight against the

FARC. Ecuador has resisted labelling the FARC a terrorist organization,

but did criticize Plan Colombia and sought reparations for collateral

damage inflicted by Colombian forces on Ecuador border population.

Meanwhile, the drug and corruption scandal keeps growing. Though Uribe

has denied most of the accusations, drug lord Ochoa Vasco has said he

is willing to negotiate his surrender to the DEA along with proof to

support his charges.

Ochoa

Vasco said some AUC leaders and drug traffickers now are willing to

negotiate their surrender to U.S. law-enforcement agencies to avoid

being murdered in Colombia, as powerful forces seek desperately to

silence them and end the ara-scandal.?/p>

In July, Henao G髆ez Bustamante ?the biggest reputed drug lord since

Pablo Escobar ?was extradited to face trafficking charges in the U.S.

He is believed to have been a key player in right-wing politics and one

of the main financers of the AUC.

The target of at least half a dozen assassination attempts while he was

in prison, G髆ez Bustamante told a magazine that he preferred being

extradited to being murdered. He also said he will disclose all the

information about drug corruption in Colombia, AUC infiltration, and

Mexican cartels, in exchange for a more lenient sentence.

Whatever is ultimately proven, however, the spilling out of evidence

linking Uribe to Colombia vast cocaine industry and to the country

history of political murders is bad news for President Bush as he

counts on Uribe to serve as the model for South America future and as

a bulwark against Hugo Ch醰ez.

–Madrid-based

André–Ÿ Cala has written about Colombia civil conflict since 1998. An

award-winning journalist, he worked in six countries for several

outlets, including the Wall Street Journal, Dow Jones Newswires, and

the Associated Press. Cala’s e-mail is:

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Related posts

Leave a Reply

Archives

December 2008
M T W T F S S
« Nov    
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  

Other

Syndication


website statistic