Elections 2008: The Race Card

by Alexander Cockburn

(Counter Punch)Political race-baiting works in America,

because racism is part of the cultural and historical furniture.

In 1960, when Barack Obama’s Kenyan father married Stanley Anne

Dunham, a white woman who grew up in the Pacific Northwest, 22

states still had laws forbidding interracial marriages. In 1967,

an appropriate year since it was the summer of love,

the US Supreme Court voided all race hygiene laws,

still on the books in 16 states. David Rosen had an instructive

essay on this history on this site

last week.

In 1988 Al Gore, running in

the New York Democratic primary against Michael Dukakis, attacked

the Massachusetts governor for supporting lax parole laws that

a year earlier had permitted a convicted black murderer called

Willie Horton to leave prison on a weekend pass. Horton used

the opportunity to rape a woman.

Dukakis prevailed nonetheless

and won the nomination. Then in the fall the Republican dirty

tricksters began circulating photos of Horton, an identikit of

every white’s nightmare about what a black rapist kicking down

the front door would look like. The leaflets insinuated that

Dukakis and Horton had been pretty much on a first name basis.

The race card was effective and was a significant factor in Dukakis’

defeat by George Bush Sr. In 2000 George Bush Jr defeated John

McCain in the South Carolina primary with the insinuation that

McCain had fathered an illegitimate black child. (McCain and

his second wife, Cindy, had adopted a child from a home in India

run by Mother Teresa.)

Here we are in 2008 and the

race card has made its inevitable appearance. True to the Willie

Horton model, on February 25 someone in the Clinton campaign

sent the Drudge website a photo of Obama in Kenya a couple of

years ago, wearing a turban and what looks like a bedsheet pretending

to be a nurse’s white uniform, though apparently it is Somali

ceremonial rig. Obama’s team cried Foul. Maggie Williams, now

running Clinton’s campaign, said Obama shouldn’t be a wuss.

Already the Republicans are

using the photo as part of what will be a long summer and fall

of two-stepping around the race card. Step One: Get some rough-houser

to fire off a slur, as did right wing radio shock jock Bill Cunningham,

sounding off ripely this week about Barack Hussein Obama

as a hack black politician in a speech introducing McCain. Step

2: piously denounce the slur, just as McCain did Cunningham’s.

It happened again last Monday

with a press release from the Tennessee Republican Party which

announced that it today joins a growing chorus of Americans

concerned about the future of the nation of Israel, the only

stable democracy in the Middle East, if Sen. Barack Hussein Obama

is elected president of the United States, On Wednesday

the Republican National Committee duly reprimanded the Tennessee

Republican Party for its use of Obama’s middle name and said

it shouldn’t happen again.

Your middle name is Hussein

and you run in a US election in 2008? Of course you catch flak.

But these are only the early salvos, as the RNC slime squad runs

profile groups to help them figure out what it can get away with.

Already right-wing columns are pillorying Obama’s mother, an

anthropology professor in Hawai’i at the time of her death in

the mid-1990s, as a fellow-traveling, crypto commie slut and

lover of non-Caucasians.

Obama’s wife Michelle, the

candidate’s wife, is being portrayed as several hundred miles

to the left of Malcom X, in large part because she said recently

that owing to the huge response to her husband’s campaign for

hope and change, For the first time in my adult lifetime,

I’m really proud of my country. Cindy McCain has taken

to saying that she for one has always been proud of her country.

In the last debate Clinton called for Obama to repudiate Louis

Farrakhan –a ritual Jesse Jackson knows well. Obama finessed

the challenge gracefully, but the Republicans are taking up the

theme. Late last week the Clinton campaign was leaking stories

about support for Obama from the former Weather Undergound couple,

Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn, both of whom became respectable

fixtures in mainstream liberal Chicago years ago. That hasn’t

stopped the Republican hit squads from painting Obama as a secret

Muslim, channeling bomb plots from Osama–whose photo an NBC

studio grip recently put up behind Obama in a news clip.

All the same, the race card

is a tricky one to play. A fall face-off between McCain and Obama

will target the crucial independent voters, many of whom will

be put off by race-baiting. Attitudes have changed, even since

the Horton era. A 2007 Gallup survey found more than three out

of four Americans approving of marriages between whites and blacks.

In 1994 less than half felt that way.

Adieu,

William Buckley

When I first came to America

in 1972 I was astonished to find that the conservative cold warrior

Wiliam Buckley had a television channel paid for out of public

funds and reserved for his exclusive use. This was PBS, which

alternated Buckley’s show with Wall St Week. In an

effort at balance PBS offered the left’s point of view in Sesame

Street. Buckley’s syndicated column was also featured in Dolly

Schiff’s New York Post. I found him mostly unwatchable and unreadable,

being 97 per cent predictable in all his views, with a style

intolerably loaded with affectation — fake English urbanity

and pompous usage. He was the sort of writer who could never

use the word punishment without sticking condign

in front of it, the better to flaunt his stylistic credentials.

Very, very occasionally he

would leaven his thrice weekly doses of balderdash with a piece

of libertarian bent on the justice system, but otherwise it was

straight cold-war paeans to the unfettered glories of capital.

It was all aimed at college-age conservatives. I doubt the rubes

could endure him. Who would, when the alterative was Jimmy Swaggart

in full spate?

It’s astonishing to read the

funeral paeans, flush with homages to Beckley’s urbane

civility. He wasn’t urbane at all, but a nasty little viper,

progenitor of Coulter’s style. Somewhere on youtube, though

I can’t find it, there’s surely the memorable moment when Eldridge

Cleaver put him away, and Buckley either dropped his pencil or

broke it. The famous encounter with Noam Chomsky can be found

and I commend you to watch it. Buckley duly found his apotheosis

in Reagan, the living political embodiment of Buckley’s philosophy

and intellectual ambit. So, farewell Mr Buckley. As CounterPuncher

Robert Ransdell put it in a note to us, William Buckley,

the old class warrior, is dead and gone to that great right-wing

valhalla in the sky where there isn’t any estate tax and the

peasants always know their place. All the rest of us (who aren’t

rich) are going to have to struggle on in an increasingly harsh

world and try to survive and fight against the ugly trends in

politics, economics and culture that he gleefully helped set

in motion, and which finally became dominant.

Looking for some trace of the

Cleaver- Buckley exchange, I did find this passage, in an interview

with Cleaver by Henry Louis Gates Jr., which ironically ran on

PBS’s Front Line about a decade ago:

GATES: Was the civil rights

movement a success?

CLEAVER: I think it was a success

in terms of the goals that it espoused. That was to break down

the color barrier in public accommodations, access to the institutions

and things like that. But the big failure of the civil rights

movement was that it did not have an economic plank because while

we got access to schools and to Hot Dog Stands and all that,

the burning issue right now is economic freedom and economic

justice and economic democracy. The NAACP didn’t touch that.

They had no plan for that. When Martin Luther King was turning

towards the economic arena in Nashville supporting the strike

of the garbage man, he was murdered. I applaud my country for

the changes that we have undertaken in these areas of civil rights.

But where the big problem still remains is with the economic

system. If you would call a meeting today to talk about segregation,

wouldn’t nobody come but Louis Farrakhan and David Dukes. But

if you call a meeting to talk about the money, it would be standing

room only. It wouldn’t all be black because the money is funny

for everybody, right. That’s where the rubber hits the road;

that’s what we’ve got to deal with.

Will candidate Obama prevail

against the racists? There’s a good chance. Against the money

power? Against Wall St? His record and his prime donors tells

us No. They tell us he’s already bought and paid for. For gloomy

buttress to this judgment I recommend to you Pam Martens’ piece

in our current newsletter and her sequel in our next one, available

Monday to subscribers only.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Related posts

Leave a Reply

Archives

December 2008
M T W T F S S
« Nov    
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  

Other

Syndication


website statistic