‘Indiana Jones’ debut survives Cannes critics

Sunday, May 18th, 2008

Indiana Jones received louder applause going in than he did coming out.

His latest adventure, “Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull,” earned a respectful though far from glowing — reception Sunday at the Cannes Film Festival, avoiding the sort of thrashing the event’s harsh critics gave to “The Da Vinci Code” two years ago.

Yet Indy’s fourth big-screen romp is not likely to go down as one of the most memorable. Some viewers at its first press screening loved it, some called it slick and enjoyable though formulaic, some said it was not worth the 19-year wait since Steven Spielberg, George Lucas and Harrison Ford made the last film.

“They should have left well enough alone,” said J. Sperling Reich, who writes for FilmStew.com. “It really looked like they were going through the motions. It really looked like no one had their heart in it.”

Alain Spira of French magazine Paris Match found “Crystal Skull” a perfectly acceptable “Indiana Jones” tale, a sentiment echoed by the solid applause the movie received as the final credits rolled.

“It’s good. It’s a product that is polished, industrial, we’re not getting ripped off in terms of quality,” Spira said. “You know what you’re going to see, you see what you get, and when you leave you’re happy.”

The applause was louder at the outset, though. Fans at the early afternoon showing, which preceded the film’s glitzy formal premiere with cast and crew Sunday night, cheered and clapped wildly at an announcement that the screening was about to start. Some even hummed the Indiana Jones fanfare as the lights went down.

The applause at the end was more subdued.

Cast and crew were unconcerned about how critics might dissect the film.

“I’m not afraid at all. I expect to have the whip turned on me,” Ford told reporters after the screening. “It’s not unusual for something that is popular to be disdained by some people, and I fully expect it.

But, he said: “I work for the people who pay to get in. They are my customers, and my focus is on providing the best experience I can for those people.”

The filmmakers kept the movie shrouded in secrecy, skipping the rounds of press screenings often held for big studio movies and going for a big blowout at Cannes.

Spielberg said he and his collaborators decided “that the fair thing to do and the fun thing to do would be to view it where the entire world is come together every year at this wonderful festival, and we thought that was the best place to introduce Indiana Jones to you again after 19 years.”

The film received none of the derisive laughter or catcalls that mounted near the end of the first press screening for “Da Vinci Code.”

There were a few titters from the “Crystal Skull” crowd early on over co-star Cate Blanchett’s thick, Boris-and-Natasha accent as a Soviet operative racing against Indy to find an artifact of immeasurable power. The rather corny romantic ending also drew a chuckle or two.

In between, the film packed a fair amount of action, though some viewers found the middle portion dull. Conchita Casanovas, of Spain’s RNE radio, said she was “bored to death.”

The new movie hurls archaeologist Jones into the Cold War in 1957. He survives a nuclear blast in the desert in typically creative fashion and is reunited with “Raiders” flame Marion Ravenwood (Karen Allen).

As speculated, the film has an alien connection, though far more subdued than the “Indiana Jones and the Saucer Men From Mars” story Lucas once envisioned.

There are melancholy nods to Sean Connery, who played Indy’s dad in 1989’s “Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade” but declined to return for the new movie, and the late Denholm Elliott, Indy’s college dean in two of the previous movies.

And the film reveals the relationship between Indy and his new sidekick, an angry young motorcycle rebel played by Shia LaBeouf.

As with “Da Vinci Code,” which went on to gross $758 million worldwide, “Crystal Skull” is so hotly anticipated that it will be virtually immune from critics’ opinions. The film is expected to put up blockbuster box-office numbers when it opens globally Thursday.

“The movie was absolutely effective enough to score with audiences everywhere,” said Anne Thompson, deputy editor of Hollywood trade paper Variety. “This played way better than ‘Da Vinci Code.’ No one was gunning for it. They were excited going in, hooting for it in a positive way.”

Dozens of fans prowled outside the Palais, the Cannes headquarters, holding signs saying they needed tickets for “Crystal Skull.”

Amelia Sims, a 19-year-old University of Georgia student studying abroad, held a sign reading “I (heart) Indy.” She managed to get a pass to the press screening and loved the movie.

“I guess I’ve been waiting 19 years for this,” Sims said. “You could say I’ve been waiting my whole life.”

But Christian Monggaard, who is reviewing “Crystal Skull” for Danish newspaper Information, said he grew up with the “Indiana Jones” films and came away from this one disappointed, finding the climax an “overblown special-effects extravaganza.”

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Related posts

Blanchett wins UK film award

Sunday, February 3rd, 2008

Cate Blanchett has won the actress of the year award at a
British film awards ceremony for her performance in the title role
of Elizabeth:
The Golden Age.
Blanchett beat competition from Oscar nominees Marion Cotillard
and Julie Christie and Atonement’s Keira Knightley at the Richard
Attenborough Film Awards.
However the awards were dominated by Atonement,
the British period drama and Golden Globe winner, which scooped
four of six prizes.
Atonement was voted film of the year by British regional
arts and entertainment journalists in all media, including critics,
editors and freelancers.
The World War II epic about two lovers torn apart by family
betrayal has also picked up seven Oscar nominations and promises to
dominate this year’s British Academy Films Awards (BAFTA) with 14
nominations.
Its director Joe Wright was voted filmmaker of the year, while
James McAvoy, named BAFTA’s rising star in 2006, was named actor of
the year for his lead role in the movie.
Screenwriter Christopher Hampton, winner of the 1988 Oscar for
scripting Dangerous Liaisons, took the screenwriter of the
year award.
“This film was shot entirely in England with a completely
British cast and crew, so it is especially thrilling that our film
has been honoured by the Richard Attenborough Film award,” said
Paul Webster, the film’s producer.
Sam Riley was named rising star of the year for his leading role
in Control, portraying the life of Ian Curtis, frontman of
English rock band Joy Division, who committed suicide at the age of
23 in 1980.
Reuters

Tags: , , , ,

Related posts

Blanchett wins UK film award

Thursday, January 31st, 2008

Cate Blanchett has won the actress of the year award at a
British film awards ceremony for her performance in the title role
of Elizabeth:
The Golden Age.
Blanchett beat competition from Oscar nominees Marion Cotillard
and Julie Christie and Atonement’s Keira Knightley at the Richard
Attenborough Film Awards.
However the awards were dominated by Atonement,
the British period drama and Golden Globe winner, which scooped
four of six prizes.
Atonement was voted film of the year by British regional
arts and entertainment journalists in all media, including critics,
editors and freelancers.
The World War II epic about two lovers torn apart by family
betrayal has also picked up seven Oscar nominations and promises to
dominate this year’s British Academy Films Awards (BAFTA) with 14
nominations.
Its director Joe Wright was voted filmmaker of the year, while
James McAvoy, named BAFTA’s rising star in 2006, was named actor of
the year for his lead role in the movie.
Screenwriter Christopher Hampton, winner of the 1988 Oscar for
scripting Dangerous Liaisons, took the screenwriter of the
year award.
“This film was shot entirely in England with a completely
British cast and crew, so it is especially thrilling that our film
has been honoured by the Richard Attenborough Film award,” said
Paul Webster, the film’s producer.
Sam Riley was named rising star of the year for his leading role
in Control, portraying the life of Ian Curtis, frontman of
English rock band Joy Division, who committed suicide at the age of
23 in 1980.
Reuters

Tags: , , , ,

Related posts

Blanchett wins at UK film awards

Thursday, January 31st, 2008

Cate Blanchett has won the actress of the year award at a
British film awards ceremony for her performance in the title role
of Elizabeth: The Golden Age.
Blanchett beat competition from Oscar nominees Marion Cotillard
and Julie Christie and Atonement’s Keira Knightley at the Richard
Attenborough Film Awards.
However the awards were dominated by Atonement, the
British period drama and Golden Globe winner, which scooped four of
six prizes.
Atonement was voted film of the year by British regional
arts and entertainment journalists in all media, including critics,
editors and freelancers.
The World War II epic about two lovers torn apart by family
betrayal has also picked up seven Oscar nominations and promises to
dominate this year’s British Academy Films Awards (BAFTA) with 14
nominations.
Its director Joe Wright was voted filmmaker of the year, while
James McAvoy, named BAFTA’s rising star in 2006, was named actor of
the year for his lead role in the movie.
Screenwriter Christopher Hampton, winner of the 1988 Oscar for
scripting Dangerous Liaisons, took the screenwriter of the year
award.
“This film was shot entirely in England with a completely
British cast and crew, so it is especially thrilling that our film
has been honoured by the Richard Attenborough Film award,” said
Paul Webster, the film’s producer.
Sam Riley was named rising star of the year for his leading role
in Control, portraying the life of Ian Curtis, frontman of English
rock band Joy Division, who committed suicide at the age of 23 in
1980.
REUTERS

Tags: , , , ,

Related posts

My lovely son, the Hollywood star

Sunday, January 6th, 2008

Sandy Lewis was devastated when she learned her son had Down’s syndrome. But here she tells how Max overcame disability and prejudice to achieve his dream and win a leading role in a new film - alongside Cate Blanchett and Bill Nighy - which is being tipped for Oscar success.On a blisteringly hot September day, Cate Blanchett is on a film set dancing with my 13-year-old son, Max. With her usual elegance and charm, Cate holds his hands and moves her body to the rhythm as the cast and crew cheer and clap. Max loves every minute of it.

Perhaps I shouldn’t be surprised.

For Max, who has Down’s syndrome, life is one big, glorious adventure. Thanks to his passion and talent, he is starring in a new Hollywood film alongside Blanchett, Judi Dench and Bill Nighy, and is ratcheting up a list of parts any actor would kill for.

In truth, Max’s birth in March 1993 was both the worst and the best thing that ever happened to me. I was 29. I’d been married to Paul, a marketing consultant, for three years and thought bad things happened to other people.

But that day, my world changed instantly and irrevocably. Every morning since, I have woken up with a black cloud hanging over me. I have had to battle with penny-pinching bureaucracy and struggle with depression to get the best for my son.

I had always known something was wrong - a mother’s instinct, perhaps.

I remember being at home in North London towards the latter part of my pregnancy listening to the radio. A programme about people with Down’s syndrome began and I had to turn it off. A sickening, anxious feeling seeped through me.

After Max was born, a calm settled over the delivery room. He was quiet - there was no robust wail welcoming the world.

The midwife passed him to me and, as I looked at his beautiful face, I was overwhelmed by two conflicting emotions - love for my new son and a deadening certainty that he had Down’s syndrome.

Paul shared my certainty. But in our eyes he was still gorgeous and we took turns to cuddle him. The staff obviously suspected all was not well and soon after the birth I was moved to a private room rather than a ward.

At about 2.30am, a paediatrician examined Max. He had talipes, commonly known as clubfoot. The doctor remarked on how lovely and pink he was, which she felt was a good sign.

But then she started talking about people with Down’s syndrome being loving and gifted musicians. I could tell she was struggling.

I looked at her and said: ‘Please tell me. Do you think my baby has Down’s syndrome?’

She averted her gaze and paused, nervously shuffling her files. ‘We have to do a blood test to be sure and I do so hope I’m wrong, but yes, I think he has Down’s syndrome.’

I welcomed the honesty but it was like a knife slicing through my precious hopes and dreams.

The doctor had to continue her rounds and left me crying. I knew nothing then about Down’s syndrome and my exhausted brain was flooded with stereotypical images: short, stout people with their tongues protruding from vacant faces, peering from Variety Club buses on their way to some cold, grey, charitable institution.

For the first time I experienced a mother’s steely protective strength. I rang Paul, who had returned home before I received the news, and repeated what the doctor had said.

Despite the probable diagnosis, I told him that I loved our son and that he was part of us now. That’s the way it’s been since: we have both had an unyielding passionate love for Max.

Down’s syndrome is caused by the presence of an extra chromosome in the DNA. One in every 1,000 babies is born with the condition and, although every child has different capabilities, they can all suffer from learning difficulties, heart disease, hearing problems and reduced life expectancy.

These were clinical cold facts to absorb shortly after giving birth to your first baby. I would have to live with the knowledge that I would almost certainly outlive my child.

And it wasn’t long before Paul and I encountered the sort of prejudice that we now know is rife in society. Max, as a frail baby, was finding it difficult to breast-feed and I explained my worries to the nurse on duty. Her reaction knocked me back.

‘Well this is the kind of thing you get with these,’ she snapped. ‘They never feed well. Why don’t you let someone else take care of him?

‘There are places, you know. Put him in a home, go on holiday, come back and have the baby you want. Your husband will leave you if you don’t.’

She then promptly left the room. I was mortified.
Her view, and that of many people in the hospital, seemed to be that we had given birth to a monster. In their opinion, Max should have been aborted. Now he would be a drain on society and us.

Thankfully, our friends and family thought differently and flowers began to arrive by the bucket-load. I welcomed them with open arms although, looking back, this reaction was probably over the top as well.

Some of our friends were in total denial, refusing to see Max as anything other than a bright little human being, his presence posing no problem whatsoever to our future lives.

In fact, the first eight months of life with Max were far from easy. He slept a lot and was an extremely good baby, but I struggled to accept the hand fate had dealt me.

There was no glow that first-time mothers enjoy. Instead, depression slowly engulfed me. I never noticed, never even caught a glimpse, until one morning I just couldn’t face the day; I couldn’t even contemplate the thought of showering or washing my hair.

I was on auto-pilot for Max, so I met his needs without question, but I badly neglected my own requirements.

Paul forced me to go to my GP, who, in turn, sent me to see a psychiatrist. She asked me all sorts of ordinary questions about how I was feeling and how my depression had manifested itself, but one question will always stay with me. She asked me if I had ever contemplated suicide.

I hesitated before I replied and I think the psychiatrist took this as dodging the truth.

But I hesitated because I struggled to find the right words to explain myself: to say that suicide is not an option for me, that my son would keep me on this earth unequivocally. His mere existence automatically justifies mine and I would never consider leaving him behind.

In the years since, my black moods have come and gone. Therapy and anti-depressants have helped. But I never let depression get in the way of my care for Max.

What’s more, for every difficulty that Max presents, there is something else he does that fills me with joy.

For example, around the time that I was first diagnosed with depression, when Max was eight months old, I recorded his first smile in my diary: ‘Like some heaven-sent sign or a declaration of a divine promise, something enchanting and wonderful happened today: Max grinned at me; not wind, not my imagination.

‘A beaming smile from cheek to chubby cheek and a sparkle deep from within his adorable twinkling eyes. Since that smile the sunshine has shone and a rainbow is engulfing me in a warm, colourful blanket.’

To this day, Max’s smile is guaranteed to light up a room. He is a charmer, an enthusiast and a huge show-off. He wakes up every morning full of energy, ready to attack the day. Whether we’re going to Legoland or Tesco, he will approach each experience with the same exuberance.

Our other son, Charlie, who was born two years after Max and does not have Down’s syndrome, is shy and sensitive. Max, on the other hand, is boisterous and also a wicked little flirt.

Ever since he was old enough to sit up, he has had an eye for a pretty woman. In restaurants, he always picks out the most attractive waitress and makes sure she gets the full effect of his hundred-megawatt smile.

From then on, we know we’ll get whatever we ask for. Even if it’s something fairly outrageous, Max will say ‘Pretty please’, and it will be done.

Of course, everyday life with Max is hard work. Just as we think we are coping, some new calamity drops on us. There are always the health worries - his immune system is weak and he is vulnerable to serious infections, particularly in the chest.

Like most children with Down’s syndrome, he was born with a hole in his heart, but the doctors say it could repair itself by the time Max is in his mid-teens.

Max can be stubborn, cannot be rushed and reacts badly to change. He has irrational fears, among them clowns and unexpected loud noises.

He is also unable to cope with failure. If something goes wrong (such as him losing a life in a computer game), he becomes quiet and grumpy.

Sometimes he will simply refuse to do what I say. ‘No! I’m not doing that,’ he will announce. Then I know I’m beaten.

It has also been a monumental struggle to ensure he gets the right kind of education.

When Max was six, Paul and I decided we wanted him to go to a normal, mainstream school. But just before he started, we had our first bruising tussle with authority in the shape of the council’s educational psychologist.

I will never forget the meeting. Within five minutes she was telling me how to approach my son’s education, presenting herself as a trustworthy professional.

She recommended that we did not get Max a Statement of Educational Needs. The statement is a contract between the local education authority and the parents of a child with special needs, stipulating exactly what extra support the authority must provide for the child. The psychologist felt that Max was doing well on his own.

I was stunned. She was suggesting he did not require full-time support within his school. Did she really imagine a child with Down’s syndrome could embark upon mainstream school without it? Although she said she had my son’s interests at heart, I think her priority was to save the council money.

We ignored her and insisted he have a statement. I suspect Paul and I were seen as troublemakers from then on. Rightly so. We would cause havoc over the coming years, eventually ending up in a financially draining legal case.

After a year Max had become a well-known fixture at his school. His generosity of spirit won him many friends and his disability taught people tolerance and humility.

But not everyone was happy. Some parents were concerned that Max was holding back their children’s learning and complained to the headteacher.

To her credit, the headteacher politely suggested that if they were unhappy with the situation, instead of whipping up unpleasant feelings, they should take steps to search for a replacement school for their children as soon as possible.

We were extremely grateful to the head for this, and for a while Max seemed to be thriving. But as soon as he started junior school at the age of nine, we noticed a change.

Max and his accompanying baggage could no longer hide quite so easily in a classroom. People were lovely to him, but he didn’t have friends. They just tolerated him when he wanted to join in.

Max was falling further and further behind and becoming more and more alienated from his classmates. He summarised his fears about going to class in a simple, pleading phrase: ‘No school today, Mum.’

Later that year, we finally decided to move him to a special-needs school. It meant another fight with the education authority over funding but we were used to it by now. Our attitude was one of polite but firm commitment, and in the end we prevailed.

It was only when Max moved to this new school that an extraordinary gap in his learning was revealed. Max had fooled us all. He had learned by heart all the books in his reading system, and actually couldn’t read at all. Paul and I were devastated.

Slowly, thanks to his new teachers and a private tutor, Max is now making some headway and enjoying school again.

His first love, however, is acting. He belongs to Chickenshed, a theatre group that has achieved some magical results with special-needs children.

I originally sent Max there just to have a bit of fun, but in the six years since joining the group he has lived and breathed the theatre. It has been his lifesaver.

To watch him while he is performing is such a treat. When he is in front of an audience he lights up and becomes more confident and buoyant. He’s a natural.

Chickenshed has not just been a release from the stress of everyday life for Max but also a launch-pad for his break into film and television. This came as a surprise. People had told me Max was a good actor but I thought they were just being kind.

I think I changed my mind when he was ten and playing one of the main roles in The Night Before Christmas. He did it beautifully - he was amazingly comfortable on stage and adored the adulation of the audience. Something special was clearly happening.

A few years later, a casting agent was looking for a young actor to play the part of Ben in the film adaptation of Zoe Heller’s dark, unsettling novel Notes On A Scandal. Max’s name was suggested by several sources. He was on his way.

On the day of the audition, Max was beside himself with excitement. I was thrilled for him but wary of possible disappointment.

I need not have worried. From the moment we walked through the door, the audition belonged to Max. It was more of a casual conversation than an audition - Max was asked about his school and his hobbies, but his energy and enthusiasm reverberated from the walls and he ended up singing some of his favourite show tunes. He really wanted this part and gave it all he had.

The director, Sir Richard Eyre, and Maggie Lunn, the casting director, said Max’s performance had blown them away. He tends to do that - he knocks people off their feet. He lights up when a camera captures his face.

The next few days were agony. Max didn’t understand the concept of the audition, that he was competing with other children and he may not get the part. But when we eventually got the call it was good news.

A video of his audition had been sent to New York for the producer’s final approval and he was in. I was filled with pride.

In the film, Max plays Ben, a boy with Down’s syndrome. Bill Nighy is his father and Cate Blanchett his mother, a pottery teacher who has an affair with one of her pupils.

Judi Dench plays a fellow teacher who befriends and then betrays Blanchett’s character. Max appears in scenes throughout the film, and before rehearsals began Paul and I spent several hours every day for five weeks teaching Max his lines. We would read them out and Max would repeat them until he had memorised them.

Filming began in the summer of 2005 in a huge Georgian house in North-West London and lasted six weeks. It was an incredible if somewhat draining experience for everyone involved. Max likes structure and could be inflexible - refusing to change his lines or do another take.

And, being the diva he is, he would often issue imperious demands. In one scene, in which he plays a wizard in a school play, Max took exception to the pyrotechnics that went off when he waved his wand. ‘No fireworks!’ he ordered Sir Richard.

Another memorable scene - in which Max and his family are eating their Christmas meal - was filmed on one of the hottest days of the year. Max will jump at the chance to eat, so much so that he is worryingly overweight.

After the fourth take, I noticed the catering crew kept having to replenish the food on the table. One of the make-up women voiced my exact thoughts: ‘Good Lord, who is actually eating this stuff?’ Then it struck me - Max!

Max was eating the food. Each take had involved him robustly tucking into his Christmas platter. It was meant to be acting, but he had stuffed himself to the gills.

I came over in a cold sweat when I imagined the likely outcome. I didn’t have long to wait. Max, hot and uncomfortable, had had enough. ‘That’s it. I want my mum and I want to go home.’

I could hear him clearly, even from the hallway, and I knew we were in for a rocky afternoon. I grabbed his sweaty little hand and led him to the basement flat that had been set aside for him.

Sadly, the usual tricks to distract Max in moments of anguish failed on this occasion

I saw no way of pulling him back. Meanwhile, shooting had come to a grinding halt. Judi, Bill and Cate were forced to sweat it out in the heat, staring at their congealed roast potatoes and soggy veg.

The crew was wonderful. No pressure was placed on me to get my child to co-operate. Fortunately, I was able to summon Paul, who persuaded Max to see out the day’s filming. He arrived back on set to the embrace of all the actors.

Martin, the first assistant director, had a keen sense of how to handle Max. When he had finished his scenes for the day, Martin would allow Max to show off his dancing skills to the cast and crew.

True to his word, Martin set up the lounge and asked for a bit of hush. Max then declared he wanted his mum to dance with him. To me, the horror of such a vision was indescribable.

‘No, not her, my other mum,’ said Max. He was demanding that Cate Blanchett dance with him. She was wonderful and rose to the occasion. I was quick to grab Max’s hand once the music stopped and whisked him away before his ego got the better of him.

By the end of filming, Max had made a lot of friends, including Cate and Bill Nighy, who is surprisingly animated and flirtatious in the flesh, unlike his cool, bohemian characters. ‘Bill’s my mate - he’s great and really funny,’ Max said.

Notes On A Scandal has already had its New York premiere and has been nominated for three Golden Globes. It opens here in February. So we now have a Hollywood star in our family. Max fits the part perfectly. We are delighted for him, as well as being a tad relieved.

Max’s love of theatre and cinema shows no sign of abating. ‘I love acting,’ he says. ‘It’s fantastic. I want to do more when I grow up.’

And it looks like he may get his wish. This year Maggie Lunn was the casting director on Lynda La Plante’s Trial And Retribution XIII and was asked by the director to get a ‘kid who can really act’ to play Miles Deacon, a boy who is a key witness in a thriller.

This is a part not written for a boy with Down’s syndrome, just a boy with lots of talent. Max got the role.

With Max it is the little things as much as the big ones that mean so much to me. Late last year we were in a park cafe and settled down by the window with a tea for me and an ice cream for Max.

Scarcely a few minutes passed before Max had finished his ice cream and was beaming with contentment. I asked him if it was as good as it looked and he reached across the table and grabbed my cheeks with both hands.

He planted a big kiss on my lips and said: ‘You’re the best mum in the whole wide world, better than all the strawberry and all the vanilla ice cream.’

That’s enough for me.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Related posts

Brad ditches Cate

Monday, December 10th, 2007

HOLLYWOOD‘S hottest dad-to-be, Brad Pitt, stood up Australian star Cate Blanchett in Cannes last night to stay by pregnant Angelina Jolie’s side.

Pitt decided against travelling to Cannes in France, because of the imminent arrival of his baby in Africa.

Pitt stars with Blanchett in the powerful new film Babel, which is one of the favourites for the coveted Palme d’Or at the Cannes film festival.

Graphic: Cannes contenders %26raquo;

While Blanchett strolled the red carpet and attended a press conference as part of the publicity drive for the film, Pitt was nowhere to be seen.

Instead, an email from him was read out to journalists overnight before the briefing began.

“With the imminent arrival of the newest addition to our family, I am unable to join Alejandro (Gonzalez Inarritu), Cate, Gael (Garcia Bernal) and the rest of the cast and crew in introducing the film,” he wrote.

But he added that he was “tremendously proud” of Babel.

Blanchett’s words about working with Pitt were even warmer.

“In terms of working with Brad, it’s like chocolate. He’s glorious and wonderful and I really wanted to work with him for a long time.”

Babel is one of three South American films among the 20 in competition in Cannes this year.

Director Inarritu provides an examination of linguistic, cultural and personal barriers that sweeps across three continents and tackles terrorism, immigration and suicide.

Pitt and Blanchett portray a couple on holiday in Morocco when tragedy strikes, and their story is linked to that of two shepherd boys living in a remote village.

A third narrative takes the audience to the US-Mexican border where a trusted nanny becomes embroiled in a terrifying journey of her own, and in Japan, a deaf and mute girl struggles to get over her mother’s death and break down social prejudice.

Inarritu weaves the plots together into a rich cinematic tapestry, where established actors like Pitt, Blanchett, Mexico’s Bernal and Japan’s Koji Yakusho appear alongside little known actors from northern Africa.

Misunderstanding and miscommunication appear on every level, between father and son, husband and wife, police and civilians and country to country.

For Inarritu, the main theme of the film was not language. Its title is taken from the Biblical story of people seeking to build a tower to God who are punished by being divided through language.

“For me that (language) is not the problem,” he said. “Language can be very easy to break.

“For me the problem is the ideas and the preconceptions we have from one to another which really pull us apart. I want this film to be basically about not what separates us but what gets us together.

“We see the other always as a threat. Being different means being dangerous.”

Hot links:

More: Entertainment news %26raquo;

Showbuzz: Celebrity gossip %26raquo;

Movies: What’s on in cinemas %26raquo;

TV: Check out our new TV guide %26raquo;

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Related posts

Archives

November 2008
M T W T F S S
« Oct    
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930

Other

Syndication


website statistic