Nicole Kidman Bullied On Facebook

Monday, December 1st, 2008

I don’t know why. I am completely indifferent as to whether Kidman’s acting skills are bad, very bad or indeed the worst in the world. And I don’t know what a crazy pill is supposed to be.

But I was not entirely surprised it existed - Facebookers are inherently unpleasant and Kidman has always polarised people.

What was something of a shock was to discover just how spoilt for choice anti-Kidman campaigners are. Type “Nicole” and “Kidman” into a Facebook search and you’re confronted with the horrible, disturbing, catty world of Kidman haters.

For every fan group there is at least one “So over Nicole Kidman” or “No wonder Tom Cruise is crazy and Keith drinks” group. Or nastier: “Nicole Kidman is Satan”, “Nicole Kidman Looks Like An Alien With Foetal Alcohol Syndrome” or just plain “I hate Nicole Kidman” groups.

And they are feral - men and women violently attacking a woman they have most likely never met or know personally.

They don’t just not like Nicole Kidman but are so filled with loathing and spite they are inspired to digitally alter photos so she looks 100 years old or attack her entirely innocent newborn baby - pages and pages of that malicious looniness bloggers are renowned for.

“She is manipulative, calculating and two faced!” said Avi Aronstan.

“Nicole = Bland,” said another and “she has the emotional scope of a spoon and she’s ugly”, Jarrod Booth wrote. And that’s the printable stuff.

But the sport of Kidman-hating has hit a grubby new low, not to mention reached greater audiences than online chatrooms in recent weeks as movie reviewers take unprecedented personal swipes at the actress on the back of the release of Australia.

In one of the many brutal reviews she is labelled “frozen, brittle and vapid”, in another she is “glacial” and there’s the standard “ice queen” barb running through many.

Cutting even deeper, one reviewer unfairly blames her “baby brain” for what he describes as an “overpaid” performance.

Melanie Reid, a columnist with The Times in Britain has been by far the most stinging.

“Australia the movie has one huge problem: it stars Nicole Kidman,” Reid wrote.

“She’s one of the most overrated actors in the world, a woman who has been the kiss of death in practically every movie she has starred in” she wrote.

They are at a loss to explain why this successful Aussie export attracts such vicious personal attack - at home and abroad - but the worst of which is in her own backyard.

Some commentators blame the roles she’s played. Some blame her apparent lack of relationship with her adopted children Conor or Isabella.

They say it’s a tall poppy or a jealousy thing, a Tom Cruise or Scientology thing. Something about red hair, lanky legs or arched eyebrows.

I think all of the above. But I also think these latest attacks on Kidman are even more meaningless than any of that - I think it’s just a case of momentum.

In the frenzy of the online world where people feed off each other and spite breeds spite, Kidman is caught up in an unofficial game of bullying.

Only with what could be the performance of her career on the cards, the timing couldn’t be worse.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Related posts

It’s all dimples and dazzle in the city of light

Tuesday, July 1st, 2008

IF JOHN GALLIANO is looking for a new muse, Australia’s own Jennifer Hawkins could be it. Galliano, the fashion designer for labels such as Christian Dior, and the professional brand ambassador Hawko already look as though they are sharing the same hair stylist, sporting matching locks at this photo opportunity in Paris yesterday.

Galliano is a red-carpet favourite of actors including Charlize Theron, Cate Blanchett and Nicole Kidman and has a long-standing relationship with Kylie Minogue, designing tour costumes for the singer.

Hawkins - already the face of a department store, a lingerie brand and a cosmetics empire - was in the city of light at the invitation of the house of Dior with tickets to her first-ever Paris couture shows. While no cash exchanged hands in her “no-strings-attached” appearance the model was reportedly offered a deal no girl could refuse: flown first-class to Paris for the shows and no doubt leaving with more than a few designer goodies, if the looks of mutual admiration in this photo are anything to go by.

The series, which features male and female contestants, is a spin-off of a British series of the same name and the free-to-air equivalent of the Foxtel series Australia’s Next Top Model. The latter ended its fourth series last night with a live eviction episode at Luna Park, with one notable absence host Jodhi Meares. SiT revealed yesterday that Meares would not attend the event, nervous of her performance in front of a live audience, and would instead appear in pre-filmed packages, leaving viewers at home none the wiser.

Tags: , , , ,

Related posts

Perez Hilton signs Aussie radio deal

Friday, May 30th, 2008

Hilton, whose real name is Mario Lavandeira, has signed a deal with radio’s Nova Network to dish the dirt on the celebrity world every morning on stations in Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Adelaide and Perth.

In his first Australian media partnership, Hollywood’s most feared blogger who isn’t afraid to let loose on Nicole Kidman and Cate Blanchett, but can’t say a bad word about Kylie Minogue, will join Nova stations from Monday broadcasting from his Los Angeles bunker.

Hilton launched his hugely popular gossip site four years ago, and has since expanded his media reach through his reality television show, What Perez Sez, and syndicated radio shows in the US and Canada.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Related posts

The dangers of celebrity politics

Sunday, April 27th, 2008

He has had dinner with Nicole Kidman and Keith Urban, enjoyed the company of Russell Crowe in a Washington hotel, been to the cricket with Hugh Jackman and, to cap it all off, visited Cate Blanchett and her new baby instead of attending the funeral of John Button.

Of course Mr Rudd has much to thank Blanchett for, because by appearing with her newborn at the 2020 Summit last weekend, she guaranteed Rudd some positive media.

Tags: , , ,

Related posts

Cate hot tip for Oscars win

Sunday, April 13th, 2008

CATE Blanchett is the bookies’ choice to win an Oscar for best supporting actress on Sunday night, although they don’t rate her chances for a double victory.

British bookmaking giant Ladbrooke’s has Blanchett at 11-10 to take home the trophy for her portrayal of music legend Bob Dylan in I’m Not There, ahead of Gone Baby Gone star Amy Ryan on 2-1. US online betting site Paddy Power has the Aussie at 6-5. American gaming site Hollywood Stock Exchange also listed Blanchett as favourite. But she is given only a slim chance of winning best actress Oscar for her role in Elizabeth: The Golden Age, with Julie Christie (Away From Her) the hot fancy. Other bookies’ favourites include Brit Daniel Day-Lewis for best actor for his powerhouse performance as a fortune-obsessed oil-magnate in There Will Be Blood. Spaniard Javier Bardem is expected to win best supporting actor for his chilling portrayal of a hitman in violent crime drama No Country For Old Men. The movie, which has already won the Producers’ Guild of America Award, the Screen Actors’ Guild Award and the Directors’ Guild of America Award for best film of the year, is tipped to win best picture Oscar. Blanchett, who is heavily pregnant with her third child, is scheduled to be a presenter at the Oscars, as are fellow expecting actors Nicole Kidman and Jessica Alba. Also confirmed to hand out Oscars are all four of last year’s major winners — Forest Whitaker, Dame Helen Mirren, Alan Arkin and Jennifer Hudson.

Tags: , , , , , ,

Related posts

Anguish management

Saturday, April 12th, 2008

Naomi Watts has carved out a niche playing set-upon
blondes and struggling heroines. Kelsey Munro looks at why torment
on screen comes naturally to her.
Naomi Watts has become the directors’ choice to play pretty
women having an awful time. She was a grief-stricken widow in
21 Grams; a journalist tormented by a girl from beyond the
grave in both The Ring movies; a midwife who tangles with
the Russian mafia in last year’s Eastern Promises; and the
mother in a family tortured by psychopaths in the coming Funny
Games. If that weren’t bad enough, she’s soon to be brutalised
by malevolent seagulls, reprising the Tippi Hedren role in a remake
of Hitchcock classic The Birds.
The British-born, Australian-raised actress has made anguish her
trademark, with a disturbing, lived-in intensity. Yet her torments
on screen bear little resemblance to the happy place where she is
in real life. The 39-year-old, whose success came famously late,
has an eight-month-old son with her partner, US actor Liev
Schreiber, and the creative clout and star power to make the movies
she chooses. So why does she keep taking these roles?
“It’s fun to play fear, the unknown,” she says. “There’s a lot
of emotion that comes within fear and that genre. I guess everyone
has their niche - and that seems to be mine.”
“I wouldn’t call her a technique actress,” says her friend, film
director John Curran. “She’s got really great instincts in the
moment and knows how to put herself out there and tap into the
emotion when she’s sort of free falling. She’s very brave in that
regard. She’s happiest when she feels like she’s a little bit out
of control.”
Lacking the aristocratic hauteur of Cate Blanchett or the
statuesque primness of friend Nicole Kidman, Watts has doggedly
carved out a screen persona that’s girlier and yet more disturbed.
But it was playing a bisexual blonde ingenue who has a breakdown in
David Lynch’s opaque Mulholland Drive that really made her
name in Hollywood.
“I guess some (of my films) are strange,” Watts says. “They’re
off, they’re not mainstream. But that’s not ever what I set out to
do - to appeal to the masses. I was just trying to do something
that would appeal to me. Maybe my mind is strange, I don’t know,”
she laughs a little.
In person, Watts doesn’t seem dark, strange or tormented.
Perched on a hotel armchair, wearing a silk turquoise top close to
the colour of her eyes, she is in Australia to promote her new
movie, The Painted Veil, directed by Curran. Her manner,
though polite, is reserved. Perhaps recent experiences have made
her wary of the media: since giving birth she has become more of a
paparazzi target, and lately everyone wants to know how she feels
about the untimely death of Heath Ledger, a former boyfriend. She
began dating the late actor, who was 11 years her junior, on the
set of Ned Kelly. She has been credited with encouraging him to
take the artistic risk of his role in Brokeback Mountain
role, although they broke up before filming started in 2004.
However, under her publicist’s threat of immediate interview
termination, I can’t ask Watts about any of this: Ledger is
off-limits. She’s happy, though, to talk about Schreiber, her
partner of three years. The couple are in Sydney for three months
while Schreiber works on X-Men Origins: Wolverine.
The Painted Veil, which finished shooting in late 2005,
was Watts and Schreiber’s first movie together. Watts and Edward
Norton star as a mismatched British couple caught in a cholera
epidemic in 1920s regional China, in the film based on W. Somerset
Maugham’s 1925 novel of the same name.
Watts finds dimension and humanity in the unsympathetic
character of Kitty Fane, a spirited, frivolous London socialite
turned adulterous wife who has an affair with Schreiber’s
character.
She admits she was worried about working with her new lover. “We
were very early in our relationship, probably only four or five
months in,” she says. “So we were both a bit edgy and nervous.
Particularly me - I’d already seen him live on stage so he had the
upper hand. (I was) still at that stage in the relationship when
you’re very intent on impressing that person…So I’m desperately
trying to impress Liev and I’m completely forgetting about how
Kitty should be moving and operating within this moment.”
The film was shot on location in the beautiful Guangxi province,
in a Chinese co-production that had its share of logistical
challenges.
“It was one of those films that have life-changing memories,”
Watts says. “It was incredible, the locations. We were really
there, living it as the locals were in these very remote parts of
the southern provinces.”
Curran says that Watts - who produced the film with Norton -
required minimal direction.
“I always liken her to a classic silent-screen actress,” Curran
says. “She’s really a master at conveying a lot by doing very
little. It’s a rare gift. Her script notes are generally about what
to take out, not what to add. She can play it: she doesn’t have to
say it with words.”
The Painted Veil’s remote locations and cultural
clashes sound like a picnic compared with Watts’s next role in
Funny Games, an R-rated film pitched as a bleak
deconstruction of violence as entertainment. It had a limited
release in the US this month.
“It was definitely difficult,” she says. “It’s a harrowing film
and subject and the way we shot the film was very close to reality.
(Director) Michael Haneke is not a believer in cheating much. When
I say that, I mean just in the way he ties your hands or…” - she
mimes tying a rope around her neck. “It was all very full on. But I
have to say I felt good making it. I conceived my son when I was
making that movie so I couldn’t have been in that much of a
state.”
After Mulholland Drive, Watts took every interesting
role she could fit in, with a strong sense of making up for lost
time. But with the birth of Alexander Pete Schreiber last July, she
applied the brakes.
“I don’t think I’d stop completely just because I’m a mum now,”
she says. “But even before my son came into the picture, I was
slowing down because I was worn out and also because of meeting
Liev and finding the balance of how we spend enough time together
and juggle work as well. But (motherhood) is fantastic. It’s
everything I wanted.”
Watts won’t discourage her son from going into the family
business, but child stardom is out. “If (acting) is his dream, then
so be it,” she says, “but certainly, that’s a long way off. No
child acting, that’s for sure.”
Watts was born in England and lived there until she was 14. (Her
father, Peter Watts, Pink Floyd’s sound engineer, died when she was
seven.) Her mother Myfanwy moved Naomi and her brother Ben to
Sydney in the early ’80s, then Watts moved to LA in the mid-’90s.
She has spent more time in the US than anywhere, but homesickness
for Australia has begun creeping back.
“I came back this time with my son, and it felt so much like
home,” she says. “I hadn’t had that feeling in a long time. It was
something about the sound of the voices, the food, the smells, the
light . . . I have a lot of nostalgia.” Still, a more permanent
homecoming is unlikely, to her regret. “Not right now. Liev is such
a New Yorker: he’s so connected to that city.”
Watts, too, seems to be leaving LA behind and moving into her
Manhattan period. She plays a Manhattan district attorney with
Clive Owen in The International, out later this year.
Intriguingly, in next year’s Need, she will play a wealthy
Manhattan therapist who learns that a suicidal patient, played by
Kidman, is having an affair with her husband. It will be the first
time the two old friends have co-starred, though their careers have
often been unkindly compared with each other.
Hollywood success came a lot quicker to Kidman. Watts was 31
when she made Mulholland Drive, after at least six years
of rejection and roles in bad movies (Children of the Corn IV,
Gross Misconduct, Tank Girl), which Watts satirised with
breathtakingly close-to-the-bone humour in the low-budget film
Ellie Parker, a minor Sundance hit.
It’s hard to imagine Kidman sending herself up as brutally as
Watts does in that film -a flawed but funny flick on digital video
about a talentless, perpetually out-of-work Australian actress in
Hollywood.
Indeed, that is Watts’s other major screen type, the struggling
actress (see King Kong and, memorably, Mulholland
Drive). It’s a role that looks a lot closer to her real life
than the tormented victim.
For a time, Watts considered turning Ellie Parker into
a TV series, but, at the last minute, pulled the plug in favour of
pursuing her big-screen dreams. In a perfect piece of cinematic
irony, it was on the last day of shooting - playing Ellie as a
B-grade blonde in a bathrobe who is doing a bad job of acting dead
- that Watts took the call cementing her success.
“We were stealing shots in very illegal places, just under the
Hollywood sign,” she says, “and I was negotiating my King
Kong contract on the phone.
“I just want to be involved with other good artists, great
filmmakers and great writers. The material has to speak to
you…because if you’re doing it for some other reason,
like…you’re going to make a lot of money; that’s just not enough
of a reason.”
Still now, with the ability to pick and choose her roles, Watts
returns to characters struggling with awful fears or torments.
“I’ve never set out to end up in that genre,” she says, then
smiles. “Having said that, I’ve always been a fan of
Hitchcock.”
The Painted Veil screens from April
24.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Related posts

Scream queen

Saturday, March 22nd, 2008

Naomi Watts has become the directors’ choice to play pretty
women having an awful time. She was a grief-stricken widow in
21 Grams; a journalist tormented by a ghost girl from
beyond the grave in both The Ring movies; a midwife who
tangles with the Russian mafia in last year’s Eastern
Promises; and the mother in a family tortured by psychopaths
in the coming Funny Games. If that wasn’t bad enough,
she’s soon to be brutalised by malevolent seagulls, reprising the
Tippi Hedren role in a remake of Hitchcock classic The
Birds.

The British-born, Australian-raised actress has made anguish her
trademark, with a disturbing, lived-in intensity. Yet pleasantly,
her torments on screen bear little resemblance to the happy place
where she is in real life. The 39-year-old, whose success came
famously late, has an eight-month-old son with her partner, US
actor Liev Schreiber; and - these days - the creative clout and
star power to make the movies she chooses.

So why does she keep taking these roles? “It’s fun to play fear,
the unknown,” she says. “There’s a lot of emotion that comes within
fear and that genre. I guess everyone has their niche - and that
seems to be mine.”
“I wouldn’t call her a technique actress,” says her friend, film
director John Curran. “She’s got really great instincts in the
moment and knows how to put herself out there and tap into the
emotion when she’s sort of free-falling. She’s very brave in that
regard. She’s happiest when she feels like she’s a little bit out
of control.”

Lacking the aristocratic hauteur of Cate Blanchett or the
statuesque primness of friend Nicole Kidman, Watts has doggedly
carved out a screen persona that’s girlier and yet more disturbed
than those peers. But it was playing a bisexual blonde ingenue who
has a breakdown in David Lynch’s opaque Mulholland Drive
that really made her name in Hollywood.

“I guess some [of my films] are strange,” Watts says. “They’re off,
they’re not mainstream. But that’s not ever what I set out to do,
to appeal to the masses. I was just trying to do something that
would appeal to me. Maybe my mind is strange, I don’t know,” she
laughs a little.

In person, Watts doesn’t seem dark, strange or tormented. Perched
in a hotel armchair, wearing a silk turquoise top close to the
colour of her eyes, she is here to promote her new movie, The
Painted Veil, directed by Curran. Her manner, though polite,
is reserved. Perhaps recent experiences have made her wary of the
media: since giving birth to her son she has become more of a
paparazzi target, and lately everyone wants to know how she feels
about the untimely death of Heath Ledger, a former boyfriend.

She began dating the late actor, who was 11 years her junior, on
the set of Ned Kelly. She has been credited with
encouraging him to take the artistic risk that was his
legacy-defining Brokeback Mountain role, although they
broke up before filming started in 2004. However, under her
publicist’s threat of immediate interview termination, I can’t ask
Watts about any of this: Ledger is off-limits.

She’s happy, though, to talk about Schreiber, her partner of three
years.
The couple are in Sydney for three months while Schreiber works on
X-Men Origins: Wolverine. The Painted Veil, which finished
shooting in late 2005, was Watts and Schreiber’s first movie
together. Watts and Edward Norton star as a mismatched British
couple stuck in a cholera epidemic in 1920s regional China, in the
film based on W. Somerset Maugham’s 1925 novel. Watts finds
dimension and humanity in the unsympathetic character of Kitty
Fane, a spirited, frivolous London socialite turned adulterous wife
who has an affair with Schreiber’s character. Watts admits she was
worried about working with her new lover.

“We were very early in our relationship, probably only four or five
months in,” she says. “So we were both a bit edgy and nervous.
Particularly me - I’d already seen him live on stage so he had the
upper hand. [I was] still at that stage in the relationship when
you’re very intent on impressing that person … So I’m desperately
trying to impress Liev and I’m completely forgetting about how
Kitty should be moving and operating within this moment.”

The film was shot on location in the beautiful Guangxi province, in
a Chinese co-production that had its share of logistical
challenges.
“It was one of those films that have life-changing memories,” Watts
says. “It was incredible, the locations. We were really there,
living it as the locals were in these very remote parts of the
southern provinces.”

Curran says that Watts - who also produced the film with Norton -
required minimal direction.
“I always liken her to a classic silent screen actress,” Curran
says. “She’s really a master at conveying a lot by doing very
little. It’s a rare gift. Her script notes are generally about what
to take out, not what to add. She can play it, she doesn’t have to
say it with words.”

The Painted Veil’s remote locations and cultural clashes
sound like a picnic compared to Watts’s next role in Funny
Games, an R-rated film pitched as a bleak deconstruction of
violence as entertainment. It had a limited release in the US this
month.

“It was definitely difficult,” she says. “It’s a harrowing film and
subject and the way we shot the film was very close to reality.
[Director] Michael Haneke is not a believer in cheating much. When
I say that I mean just in the way he ties your hands or …” - she
mimes tying a rope around her neck.

“It was all very full on. But I have to say I felt good making it,
I conceived my son when I was making that movie so I couldn’t have
been in that much of a state.”

After Mulholland Drive, Watts took every interesting role
she could fit in, with a strong sense of making up for lost time.
But with the birth of Alexander Pete Schreiber last July, she has
applied the brakes.

“I don’t think I’d stop completely just because I’m a mum now,” she
says. “But even before my son came into the picture I was slowing
down, because I was worn out and also because of meeting Liev and
finding the balance of how we spend enough time together and juggle
work as well.
“But [motherhood] is fantastic, it’s everything I wanted.”

She won’t discourage her son from going into the family business
but prepubescent stardom is out.

“If [acting] is his dream then so be it,” she says. “But certainly,
that’s a long way off. No child acting, that’s for sure.”

Watts was born and lived in England until she was 14 (father Peter
Watts, Pink Floyd’s sound engineer, died when she was seven). Her
mother Myfanwy moved Naomi and her brother Ben to Sydney in the
early ’80s, then Naomi moved to LA in the mid-’90s. She has spent
more time in the US than anywhere but homesickness for Australia
has begun creeping back.

“I came back this time with my son, and it felt so much like home,”
she says. “I hadn’t had that feeling in a long time. It was
something about the sound of the voices, the food, the smells, the
light … I have a lot of nostalgia.”

Still, a more permanent homecoming is unlikely, to her regret. “Not
right now - Liev is such a New Yorker, he’s so connected to that
city.”
Watts, too, seems to be leaving LA behind and moving into her
Manhattan period. She plays a Manhattan district attorney with
Clive Owen in The International, out later this year.
Intriguingly, in next year’s Need, she will play a wealthy
Manhattan therapist who learns that a suicidal patient, played by
Nicole Kidman, is having an affair with her husband. It will be the
first time the two old friends have co-starred, though their
careers have often been unkindly compared with each other.
Hollywood success came a lot quicker to Kidman.

Watts was 31 when she made Mulholland Drive. That was
after at least six years of rejection in Hollywood and roles in bad
movies (Children Of The Corn IV, Gross Misconduct, Tank
Girl), which Watts satirised with breathtakingly
close-to-the-bone humour in the low-budget film Ellie Parker, a
minor Sundance hit. It’s hard to imagine Kidman sending herself up
as brutally as Watts does in that film - a flawed but funny flick
on digital video about a talentless, perpetually out-of-work
Australian actress in Hollywood.

Indeed that is Watts’s other major screen type, the struggling
actress (see King Kong, Ellie Parker and, memorably,
Mulholland Drive). It’s a role that looks a lot closer to
her real life than the tormented victim. For a time, Watts was
considering turning Ellie Parker into a TV series but at
the last minute pulled the plug in favour of pursuing her big
screen dreams. In a perfect piece of cinematic irony, it was on the
last day of shooting - playing Ellie as a B-grade blonde in a
bathrobe who is doing a bad job of acting dead - that Watts took
the call cementing her success.

“We were stealing shots in very illegal places just under the
Hollywood sign,” she says, “and I was negotiating my King
Kong contract on the phone.

“I just want to be involved with other good artists, great
filmmakers and great writers. The material has to speak to you …
because if you’re doing it for some other reason, like … you’re
going to make a lot of money; that’s just not enough of a
reason.”

Still now, with the ability to pick and choose her roles, Watts
returns to characters struggling with awful fears or torments.

“I’ve never set out to end up in that genre,” she says, then
smiles. “Having said that, I’ve always been a fan of
Hitchcock.”
The Painted Veil opens on April 24.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Related posts

Critics dismiss Cate’s chances

Tuesday, March 18th, 2008

THE winter rain storms that have struck Los Angeles may not be the only thing that soaks Cate Blanchett’s party at today’s 80th Annual Academy Awards.

Blanchett’s hopes of an historic double Oscar win have been dashed with bookmakers and film critics giving her next to no chance of claiming both gold trophies.

No actor or actress in the event’s 80-year history has scooped both the acting and supporting Oscars at the one ceremony.

Bookmakers believe Blanchett will win one Oscar at the ceremony, which is scheduled to begin at noon (AEDT).

However, many influential critics from leading US news organisations predict the 38-year-old expectant mum will go home empty-handed.

%26quot;I’d like to say Blanchett, since her work is time-capsule-worthy,%26quot; Rolling Stone magazine film critic Peter Travers wrote in his analysis of the best supporting category.

%26quot;But watch out for Ruby Dee.%26quot;

Bookmakers in Australia, Britain and the US have rejected the critics, and have kept Blanchett as the short-priced favourite to win supporting actress for her portrayal of Bob Dylan in I’m Not There.

A survey of 32 critics and leading Oscar pundits by the Los Angeles Times newspaper have many picking 83-year-old American Gangster actress, Ruby Dee, or Amy Ryan, for Gone Baby Gone, to upset Blanchett.

Blanchett has odds of 5-4, while Ryan is at 2-1 and Dee, who has received plenty of support in recent days, is at 9-4.

The oddsmakers, critics and pundits all agree Blanchett has little chance of winning the best actress Oscar for her performance in Elizabeth: The Golden Age.

Blanchett’s odds have blown out to around 40-1, while the short-priced favourite is British actress Julie Christie for Away from Her at 1-2.

The LA Times today described Blanchett’s nomination for Elizabeth: The Golden Age as %26quot;filler%26quot; in the best actress category.

%26quot;Blanchett plays dress-up and hams it up with the rest of the movie,%26quot; LA Times critic Carina Chocano wrote.

%26quot;It looks like fun, and Blanchett is as always a lovely and commanding presence, but there’s nothing here that draws us into it or illuminates the character in a new way.%26quot;

Australia also is represented at the Oscars in the documentary feature category, with Eva Orner, the 38-year-old producer of Taxi to the Dark Side, a film critical of the US war on terrorism.

Outspoken American documentary maker Michael Moore is nominated for his expose on the American health system, Sicko.

Rain has been falling steadily across Los Angeles the past 24 hours and the Academy has erected a large canopy to protect the nominees and award presenters, including Nicole Kidman, along the 400m long red carpet entrance into Hollywood’s Kodak Theatre.

The favourite for the best actor Oscar is Daniel Day-Lewis for There Will Be Blood, which is nominated for eight awards.

No Country for Old Men, also with eight nominations, is expected to dominate in the best picture, best supporting actor (Javier Bardem) and best director (Joel and Ethan Coen) categories.

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Related posts

Sweet! A nutcracker guard for stars

Thursday, March 13th, 2008

At last the Zeitgeist has thrown up another tool for analysing
popular culture that is almost as powerful as the notion of
“jumping the shark”. It is the concept of “the nut guard”.
If it had been created in Australia it would probably have been
called “the cup” or “the box”, by analogy with the device used by
cricketers to protect their vulnerable parts.
However, because it was created in the US, it is defined thus by
Entertainment Weekly: “Nut guard (noun): the credit on an
actor’s resume that is so beloved it stops fans from wanting to
actually kick him where it hurts after sitting through his latest
stinker.
“Origin: after seeing Fred Claus, Mandi told her friend
Karen that she wanted to kick Vince Vaughn in the nuts. Karen said,
‘You can’t. He’s got a nut guard because of Swingers.”‘ So
John Travolta, who has made many a kickworthy, gets a nut guard for
Pulp Fiction; Brad Pitt is guarded by Fight Club and
George Clooney by Michael Clayton. Tom Cruise, whose whole
life is kickworthy, gets nut guards for Rain Man and
Collateral.
The concept applies to women, too, even if it’s a technical
misnomer. Lindsay Lohan’s nut guard is Mean Girls, which is
not nearly enough. Angelina Jolie’s is A Mighty Heart, which
counterbalances two Lara Croft movies. Cate Blanchett has so many
guards she could do kickworthies for the rest of her career.
Last year, this column, after consulting its readers, declared
that Nicole Kidman had jumped the shark, based on a string of
embarrassments that displayed chronic bad taste in scripts.
Since then, she’s been the best performer in The Golden
Compass and has played an interesting neurotic in Margot At
The Wedding (which made just $80,000 in its first week in
Australian cinemas, suggesting Our Nic is not a huge drawcard in
her own land).
Any protection she may claim from those performances is
dissolved by a flick just opened here; the sci-fi potboiler The
Invasion (in our photo, Kidman has just learned that her former
husband has been turned into a zombie by aliens, which sounds like
the story of her life).
Like The Stepford Wives, it’s the kind of shark-jump
symptom that causes audiences too polite to don the steel-capped
boots to ask: “What was she thinking?”
The nut guard is a new tool for media analysts, and its
parameters need refining. Click here if you can
help with these questions:
Is an Oscar-winning performance automatically a nut guard, and
how many kickworthies should it block?
What is the current nut guard/kickworthy balance of Eric Bana,
Toni Collette, Russell Crowe, Judy Davis, Mel Gibson, Rachel
Griffiths, Hugh Jackman, Nicole Kidman, Miranda Otto, Guy Pearce,
Geoffrey Rush, Naomi Watts and Hugo Weaving?
It is, of course, a matter of personal opinion, and we’d like to
hear yours.

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Related posts

Sweet! A nutcracker guard for stars

Thursday, March 13th, 2008

At last the Zeitgeist has thrown up another tool for analysing
popular culture that is almost as powerful as the notion of
“jumping the shark”. It is the concept of “the nut guard”.
If it had been created in Australia it would probably have been
called “the cup” or “the box”, by analogy with the device used by
cricketers to protect their vulnerable parts.
However, because it was created in the US, it is defined thus by
Entertainment Weekly: “Nut guard (noun): the credit on an
actor’s resume that is so beloved it stops fans from wanting to
actually kick him where it hurts after sitting through his latest
stinker.
“Origin: after seeing Fred Claus, Mandi told her friend
Karen that she wanted to kick Vince Vaughn in the nuts. Karen said,
‘You can’t. He’s got a nut guard because of Swingers.”‘ So
John Travolta, who has made many a kickworthy, gets a nut guard for
Pulp Fiction; Brad Pitt is guarded by Fight Club and
George Clooney by Michael Clayton. Tom Cruise, whose whole
life is kickworthy, gets nut guards for Rain Man and
Collateral.
The concept applies to women, too, even if it’s a technical
misnomer. Lindsay Lohan’s nut guard is Mean Girls, which is
not nearly enough. Angelina Jolie’s is A Mighty Heart, which
counterbalances two Lara Croft movies. Cate Blanchett has so many
guards she could do kickworthies for the rest of her career.
Last year, this column, after consulting its readers, declared
that Nicole Kidman had jumped the shark, based on a string of
embarrassments that displayed chronic bad taste in scripts.
Since then, she’s been the best performer in The Golden
Compass and has played an interesting neurotic in Margot At
The Wedding (which made just $80,000 in its first week in
Australian cinemas, suggesting Our Nic is not a huge drawcard in
her own land).
Any protection she may claim from those performances is
dissolved by a flick just opened here; the sci-fi potboiler The
Invasion (in our photo, Kidman has just learned that her former
husband has been turned into a zombie by aliens, which sounds like
the story of her life).
Like The Stepford Wives, it’s the kind of shark-jump
symptom that causes audiences too polite to don the steel-capped
boots to ask: “What was she thinking?”
The nut guard is a new tool for media analysts, and its
parameters need refining. Click here if you can
help with these questions:
Is an Oscar-winning performance automatically a nut guard, and
how many kickworthies should it block?
What is the current nut guard/kickworthy balance of Eric Bana,
Toni Collette, Russell Crowe, Judy Davis, Mel Gibson, Rachel
Griffiths, Hugh Jackman, Nicole Kidman, Miranda Otto, Guy Pearce,
Geoffrey Rush, Naomi Watts and Hugo Weaving?
It is, of course, a matter of personal opinion, and we’d like to
hear yours.

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Related posts

Archives

December 2008
M T W T F S S
« Nov    
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  

Other

Syndication


website statistic