Cate Blanchett’s green theatre

Saturday, May 3rd, 2008

The 38-year-old actress and her husband, playwright Andrew Upton - who are both artistic co-directors of the Sydney Theatre Company - want to make the business the first green building on Sydney Harbour.

She said: “We would have greened the internal offices anyway, but then Andrew said, ‘This place is perfect to put solar panels in and take it off the grid completely.’

“If theatre is not engaged in its time and place, and connecting itself to the immediate and current concerns of society, then it very quickly becomes irrelevant.”

Australian-born Blanchett, who has been a green activist since her schooldays, also lives in an eco-friendly home.

She added to Britain’s Marie Claire magazine: “I can’t believe how uncommon greening practices for the home are. We’ve had solar panels installed, but they’re still seen as a left field idea. We’ve also got rain water tanks and we’re using a natural air-flow to cool the house.”

English musician KT Tunstall also owns her own eco-home, while actress Daryl Hannah lives in a solar powered house and drives a car fuelled by recycled cooking oil.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Related posts

Cate Blanchett Gives Birth And Heads Straight Back To Work

Thursday, April 17th, 2008

Oscar-winning actress Cate Blanchett has given birth to her third child, Find Cate Mandigo and surprised fellow antipodeans by announcing she will be back at work in six days time.

The Australian star of Elizabeth delivered a 3.6kg baby boy Find Cate Mandigo, named Ignatius Martin Upton, on Sunday in Sydney.

Today, the actress surprised Australians with the news she plans to honour a commitment to chair a government summit on the arts which starts on Saturday.

Congratulating the 38-year-old actress today, Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd announced Blanchett had asked for a co-chair but would still travel from Sydney to Canberra to participate in the summit this weekend.

“I want to extend my best wishes to Ms Blanchett and her family and thank her for her contribution to the Australia 2020 Summit thus far.

“Ms Blanchett has indicated that she will continue to participate in the 2020 Summit in her role as a co-chair of the Creative Australia panel.”

Blanchett and her playwright husband, Andrew Upton, already have two sons - Dashiell, 6, and Roman, 3.

A spokesman for the Sydney Theatre Company, where the couple are joint artistic directors, told Australian journalists: “All are well and very happy.”

Last year, the actress, who won an Oscar for The Aviator, spoke to The Times of her desire for more children.

“I feel completely and utterly expanded by being a mother. And yes there are compromises and things that one can’t do, but there are a lot of things that one can do and I just find them hilarious and wonderful.

“And it’s a cliché, but it’s true, the reserves of feeling that one finds for them is limitless. You think, ‘I have one, how could I find any more love for a second one?’ Find Cate Mandigo and you do.”

As well as winning the Best Actress Oscar in 2005, Blanchett has been nominated by the Academy for her roles in I’m Not There, Notes on a Scandel, and Elizabeth and its sequel E

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Related posts

Cate Blanchett says US ties ‘embarrassing’

Saturday, March 29th, 2008

CATE Blanchett wants the winner of next month’s federal election to free Australia from its “embarrassing” relationship with the US.

The Oscar winning actress says Australia is too closely tied to the US and has made a mistake by isolating itself from its Asian neighbours.

%26ldquo;Whoever gets in will have to deal with this climate of paranoia,%26rdquo; she told London’s Guardian newspaper.

%26ldquo;We’re so in America’s back pocket it’s embarrassing.

%26ldquo;We have to claim our individualism, but also reconnect to the world in a better way.

%26ldquo;We’ve really isolated ourselves from Asia.

%26ldquo;I think that’s politically and culturally very foolish.

%26ldquo;The problem with Australia is that it’s uranium- and coal-rich, so whoever gets in needs to be really responsible.%26rdquo;

Blanchett was in London this week for the premiere of her latest film, Elizabeth: The Gold Age.

She and playwright husband Andrew Upton are due to take over as artistic directors at the Sydney Theatre Company in January.

Blanchett said she hoped her new theatre role would last beyond the three-year contract she and Upton signed.

%26ldquo;You can’t really achieve anything in three years,%26rdquo; she said.

Tags: , , , , ,

Related posts

This tale’s not for wagging

Monday, March 10th, 2008

%26bull; A%26E - Tom Cardy’s festival blog

%26bull; More festival stories

Catton, a university student who won last year%26#39;s Sunday Star-Times Short Story Competition when aged 22, was one of six writers in the Writers and Readers Week event yesterday.
The challenge involved visiting six mystery places around Wellington - including the SPCA, Parliament, the railway station and Les Mills gym - and writing 1200 words on a laptop, based on the day.
The writers read their finished work at the Pacific Blue Festival Club last night. The three judges chose Victoria University writer-in-residence David Geary as winner of the overall $2000 award. Catton won the people%26#39;s choice award.
Catton said she came into the competition with a blank slate. %26quot;If you plan ahead, you can commit yourself to an idea that doesn%26#39;t work on the day.%26quot;
One of the day%26#39;s most unexpected encounters was at the railway station when a girl stopped and played her a song on the violin she was carrying.
Last year Catton, a student in the Masters in Creative Writing programme at Victoria University, won the Adam Prize for her novel The Rehearsal which she is finishing now.
Other Wellington writers in Once Upon a Deadline were playwright and performer Jo Randerson, and playwright Briar Grace-Smith. They were joined by 2006 Sunday Star-Times Short Story Competition winner Sarah Laing of Auckland, and 2007 BNZ Katherine Mansfield Short Story Award winner Carl Nixon from Christchurch.
Writers and Readers Week opens today. International writers include Doonesbury cartoonist Garry Trudeau, novelist Ian McEwan, food writer Ruth Reichl and Nobel prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz.

Tags: , ,

Related posts

Cate Blanchett says US ties ‘embarrassing’

Thursday, March 6th, 2008

CATE Blanchett wants the winner of next month’s federal election to free Australia from its “embarrassing” relationship with the US.

The Oscar winning actress says Australia is too closely tied to the US and has made a mistake by isolating itself from its Asian neighbours.

%26ldquo;Whoever gets in will have to deal with this climate of paranoia,%26rdquo; she told London’s Guardian newspaper.

%26ldquo;We’re so in America’s back pocket it’s embarrassing.

%26ldquo;We have to claim our individualism, but also reconnect to the world in a better way.

%26ldquo;We’ve really isolated ourselves from Asia.

%26ldquo;I think that’s politically and culturally very foolish.

%26ldquo;The problem with Australia is that it’s uranium- and coal-rich, so whoever gets in needs to be really responsible.%26rdquo;

Blanchett was in London this week for the premiere of her latest film, Elizabeth: The Gold Age.

She and playwright husband Andrew Upton are due to take over as artistic directors at the Sydney Theatre Company in January.

Blanchett said she hoped her new theatre role would last beyond the three-year contract she and Upton signed.

%26ldquo;You can’t really achieve anything in three years,%26rdquo; she said.

Tags: , , , , ,

Related posts

Can-do Cate

Monday, March 3rd, 2008

SHE’S Cate08 and she’s everywhere: walking the red carpet at the
Academy Awards, directing plays, running Australia’s biggest
theatre company, in the women’s glossies because she’s pregnant,
and now serving as the sole woman on Kevin Rudd’s 2020 summit
“steering committee”. For those of us juggling just the one job
with family life, and hardly ever receiving calls from Kevin Rudd
or Steven Spielberg, Blanchett’s energy is amazing. Megan Gale
might be the new Wonder Woman in Hollywood, but Blanchett is the
real thing.
Despite some annoyance at gender imbalance %26#151; the executive
director of Women on Boards, Claire Braund, said having nine men on
the 10-member board “smacks of 11th century paternalism, not 21st
century engagement” %26#151; no one so far is publicly questioning
Blanchett’s appointment. Rather, it has served to reinforce her
reputation as a can-do polymath with a name that causes doors to
swing open.
Versatile? Hosting the Academy Awards last week, Jon Stewart
riffed on Blanchett’s acting range. “She played Queen Elizabeth,
she played Bob Dylan, and a lot of people don’t know this, but that
scene from No Country For Old Men when Javier Bardem is
being chased by a pit bull that, too, was Cate
Blanchett.”
What the audience didn’t know was that Blanchett’s consolation
for dipping out on an Oscar was a seat at Rudd’s top table, leading
a session, with Arts Minister Peter Garrett, on the topic “Towards
a creative Australia”. She will be performing that task around the
time her third child is due.
Add to this her role as the director of the Sydney Theatre
Company’s The Year of Magical Thinking (starring the woman
she succeeds, Robyn Nevin, and which begins next month) and her
role that began in January as joint artistic director (with her
playwright/director husband Andrew Upton) of the STC. And don’t
forget her “ambassadorship” for a luxury skin-care line. Chasing a
psychopath with a bad Beatle haircut would be the least of her
problems.
Is there nothing Cate Blanchett cannot do, and do well? Seems
not. And in a nation where no tall poppy goes uncut, it’s unusual
that it’s hard to find anyone willing to wield the scythe.
“I don’t know of too many people anywhere in the world in any
kind of cultural industry that would do it with such acumen,” says
outgoing Australian Film Institute chief executive James Hewison of
her role at the Rudd talkfest.
“She enjoys considerable renown She’s got both an
internationalist perspective and, by virtue of her desire to come
and live and work in Australia once again, she’s interested in what
is taking place here culturally. I would suggest she’s an excellent
appointment.”
Ivanhoe-born and Methodist Ladies College-schooled, Blanchett is
known as a no-nonsense, down-to-earth operator, a long way from an
air-kissing “luvvie”. For the past two years Blanchett showed her
loyalty to home when she broke into a busy schedule to attend the
AFI Awards, and last year sat alongside Hewison. “She could have
chosen both to sit elsewhere and have other conversations with
other people, but she was remarkably warm and open as well as
bloody good company,” he remembers.
“She’s been intelligent enough to hold onto who she is and to
the real values that surround her,” says Neil Armfield, artistic
director of Sydney’s Company B theatre company and director of the
Australian film Candy.
Michael Veitch, actor, writer and host of the ABC’s Sunday
Arts program, says Blanchett’s appointment as joint artistic
director at the STC is inspired. “Theatre companies are really
having to reinvent themselves,” he says. “They’ve been in the
doldrums for a long time, they have to compete with so many other
media which are much easier and more accessible and immediate and
which require less concentration spans %26#151; so I think it’s a
clever and brave decision.
“She’s incredibly charming, she has vision, and we are yet to
see a lot of what she’s going to do, but she’s given every
impression that she’s going to really try and make theatre a lot
more interesting but not exclusive.”
It is “fantastic” that Blanchett is involved in Rudd’s summit,
Veitch says. “Her scope hasn’t even been tapped yet. The potential
in the woman is unlimited. She was always not just a star, she has
a very good brain. The fact that she’s been willing to take on
these roles %26#151; you could never imagine, say, Nicole Kidman
doing something like this because they are a completely different
animal.”
There can be a natural suspicion of achievers, especially from
the world of acting, jumping out of their area of expertise. George
Clooney, who campaigns for the beleaguered Darfur region of Sudan,
doesn’t suffer that, and neither, largely, does Leonardo DiCaprio,
who is seen as a well-intentioned green advocate. But there is
sniffiness about Angelina Jolie, a United Nations Goodwill
ambassador, who was the butt of a joke at the Academy Awards about
babies and adopting.
Martin Sheen’s run-ins with police at demonstrations only serves
to draw attention to the causes he either espouses or protests
against, although “Hanoi Jane” Fonda will tell you how volatile it
can be mixing show business with politics.
It is brave or foolhardy to question Blanchett’s ability to
multi-task. Last year she copped a rare bit of prejudice when STC
actor Colin Moody quit the company over Blanchett’s appointment,
saying “an Oscar for acting is not a suitable recommendation to run
the biggest theatre company in the country”. He declined to say
what was.
The AFI’s James Hewison says the “sniping around her bona fides
or otherwise” on her STC appointment was “pretty extraordinary”.
“That (criticism) seemed to be rather contained within certain
postcodes of that city.” In the arts, he says, “rivalries,
jealousies abound, as with everywhere, to be frank I put it down to
that, but it did leave a kind of sour taste in my mouth. It seemed
to be a product of petty small-mindedness, I have to say.”
“No one would have anything to gain from launching in,” says
Neil Armfield of any tall poppy tendencies. “She’s extremely
generous herself and I think people respond to that kindness. There
was more than one comment about the appropriateness of Cate and
Andrew running the Sydney Theatre Company, but she’s someone who
people have a great loyalty to.”
“I’ve seen the respect that she’s gained already from within the
Sydney community,” says veteran Melbourne arts administrator Sue
Nattrass. Nattrass says Blanchett is “obviously highly intelligent
%26#151; you can tell from her acting ability, the way she attacks
roles”, and her star power was earned, not conferred by the
media.
She noted Blanchett’s energy, and subscribes to the idea that if
you want something done, give it to a busy person.
“She’s young, she’s vital, she’s bright. I cover a broad range
of things in what I do, and I find that each one informs the other
and it’s a help rather than a hinderance,” Nattrass says.
Some see Blanchett as a natural fit in the new Rudd era of idea
encouragement.
“Cate is a hybrid of artist, administrator and intellectual,”
says Michael Veitch.
“I think she’s emblematic of the cultural thaw that we’re seeing
taking place since the change of government. She’s thinking outside
the ever-decreasing concentric cultural circles that a lot of
people in the arts in a small country like ours are bound by. She’s
thinking globally.”
“Cate is a great person and a great thinker and obviously
carries huge cachet because she’s a star,” says Neil Armfield.
“That’s probably worth a lot to the Government, but she wouldn’t
be there if she wasn’t good as well.”
It’s only early, but 2008 has started out as The Year of the
Cate.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Related posts

Can-do Cate

Saturday, March 1st, 2008

SHE’S Cate08 and she’s everywhere: walking the red carpet at the
Academy Awards, directing plays, running Australia’s biggest
theatre company, in the women’s glossies because she’s pregnant,
and now serving as the sole woman on Kevin Rudd’s 2020 summit
“steering committee”. For those of us juggling just the one job
with family life, and hardly ever receiving calls from Kevin Rudd
or Steven Spielberg, Blanchett’s energy is amazing. Megan Gale
might be the new Wonder Woman in Hollywood, but Blanchett is the
real thing.
Despite some annoyance at gender imbalance %26#151; the executive
director of Women on Boards, Claire Braund, said having nine men on
the 10-member board “smacks of 11th century paternalism, not 21st
century engagement” %26#151; no one so far is publicly questioning
Blanchett’s appointment. Rather, it has served to reinforce her
reputation as a can-do polymath with a name that causes doors to
swing open.
Versatile? Hosting the Academy Awards last week, Jon Stewart
riffed on Blanchett’s acting range. “She played Queen Elizabeth,
she played Bob Dylan, and a lot of people don’t know this, but that
scene from No Country For Old Men when Javier Bardem is
being chased by a pit bull that, too, was Cate
Blanchett.”
What the audience didn’t know was that Blanchett’s consolation
for dipping out on an Oscar was a seat at Rudd’s top table, leading
a session, with Arts Minister Peter Garrett, on the topic “Towards
a creative Australia”. She will be performing that task around the
time her third child is due.
Add to this her role as the director of the Sydney Theatre
Company’s The Year of Magical Thinking (starring the woman
she succeeds, Robyn Nevin, and which begins next month) and her
role that began in January as joint artistic director (with her
playwright/director husband Andrew Upton) of the STC. And don’t
forget her “ambassadorship” for a luxury skin-care line. Chasing a
psychopath with a bad Beatle haircut would be the least of her
problems.
Is there nothing Cate Blanchett cannot do, and do well? Seems
not. And in a nation where no tall poppy goes uncut, it’s unusual
that it’s hard to find anyone willing to wield the scythe.
“I don’t know of too many people anywhere in the world in any
kind of cultural industry that would do it with such acumen,” says
outgoing Australian Film Institute chief executive James Hewison of
her role at the Rudd talkfest.
“She enjoys considerable renown She’s got both an
internationalist perspective and, by virtue of her desire to come
and live and work in Australia once again, she’s interested in what
is taking place here culturally. I would suggest she’s an excellent
appointment.”
Ivanhoe-born and Methodist Ladies College-schooled, Blanchett is
known as a no-nonsense, down-to-earth operator, a long way from an
air-kissing “luvvie”. For the past two years Blanchett showed her
loyalty to home when she broke into a busy schedule to attend the
AFI Awards, and last year sat alongside Hewison. “She could have
chosen both to sit elsewhere and have other conversations with
other people, but she was remarkably warm and open as well as
bloody good company,” he remembers.
“She’s been intelligent enough to hold onto who she is and to
the real values that surround her,” says Neil Armfield, artistic
director of Sydney’s Company B theatre company and director of the
Australian film Candy.
Michael Veitch, actor, writer and host of the ABC’s Sunday
Arts program, says Blanchett’s appointment as joint artistic
director at the STC is inspired. “Theatre companies are really
having to reinvent themselves,” he says. “They’ve been in the
doldrums for a long time, they have to compete with so many other
media which are much easier and more accessible and immediate and
which require less concentration spans %26#151; so I think it’s a
clever and brave decision.
“She’s incredibly charming, she has vision, and we are yet to
see a lot of what she’s going to do, but she’s given every
impression that she’s going to really try and make theatre a lot
more interesting but not exclusive.”
It is “fantastic” that Blanchett is involved in Rudd’s summit,
Veitch says. “Her scope hasn’t even been tapped yet. The potential
in the woman is unlimited. She was always not just a star, she has
a very good brain. The fact that she’s been willing to take on
these roles %26#151; you could never imagine, say, Nicole Kidman
doing something like this because they are a completely different
animal.”
There can be a natural suspicion of achievers, especially from
the world of acting, jumping out of their area of expertise. George
Clooney, who campaigns for the beleaguered Darfur region of Sudan,
doesn’t suffer that, and neither, largely, does Leonardo DiCaprio,
who is seen as a well-intentioned green advocate. But there is
sniffiness about Angelina Jolie, a United Nations Goodwill
ambassador, who was the butt of a joke at the Academy Awards about
babies and adopting.
Martin Sheen’s run-ins with police at demonstrations only serves
to draw attention to the causes he either espouses or protests
against, although “Hanoi Jane” Fonda will tell you how volatile it
can be mixing show business with politics.
It is brave or foolhardy to question Blanchett’s ability to
multi-task. Last year she copped a rare bit of prejudice when STC
actor Colin Moody quit the company over Blanchett’s appointment,
saying “an Oscar for acting is not a suitable recommendation to run
the biggest theatre company in the country”. He declined to say
what was.
The AFI’s James Hewison says the “sniping around her bona fides
or otherwise” on her STC appointment was “pretty extraordinary”.
“That (criticism) seemed to be rather contained within certain
postcodes of that city.” In the arts, he says, “rivalries,
jealousies abound, as with everywhere, to be frank I put it down to
that, but it did leave a kind of sour taste in my mouth. It seemed
to be a product of petty small-mindedness, I have to say.”
“No one would have anything to gain from launching in,” says
Neil Armfield of any tall poppy tendencies. “She’s extremely
generous herself and I think people respond to that kindness. There
was more than one comment about the appropriateness of Cate and
Andrew running the Sydney Theatre Company, but she’s someone who
people have a great loyalty to.”
“I’ve seen the respect that she’s gained already from within the
Sydney community,” says veteran Melbourne arts administrator Sue
Nattrass. Nattrass says Blanchett is “obviously highly intelligent
%26#151; you can tell from her acting ability, the way she attacks
roles”, and her star power was earned, not conferred by the
media.
She noted Blanchett’s energy, and subscribes to the idea that if
you want something done, give it to a busy person.
“She’s young, she’s vital, she’s bright. I cover a broad range
of things in what I do, and I find that each one informs the other
and it’s a help rather than a hinderance,” Nattrass says.
Some see Blanchett as a natural fit in the new Rudd era of idea
encouragement.
“Cate is a hybrid of artist, administrator and intellectual,”
says Michael Veitch.
“I think she’s emblematic of the cultural thaw that we’re seeing
taking place since the change of government. She’s thinking outside
the ever-decreasing concentric cultural circles that a lot of
people in the arts in a small country like ours are bound by. She’s
thinking globally.”
“Cate is a great person and a great thinker and obviously
carries huge cachet because she’s a star,” says Neil Armfield.
“That’s probably worth a lot to the Government, but she wouldn’t
be there if she wasn’t good as well.”
It’s only early, but 2008 has started out as The Year of the
Cate.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Related posts

Amid the darkness, gems shine bright

Friday, February 22nd, 2008

Forget the bleakness of the movies. Disregard the fear, anger
and despair in There Will Be Blood, No Country For Old Men,
Michael Clayton and Atonement. The 80th Academy Awards
are the chance to celebrate what’s been great about the movies over
the past year.
It has been something special seeing Cate Blanchett transform
into Bob Dylan, Marion Cotillard into Edith Piaf, Javier Bardem
into a cold-blooded professional killer, Viggo Mortensen into a
tattooed Russian mobster and fresh-faced Ellen Page into a sparky
pregnant teenager.
But will any of them win Oscars? Days out, it remains a wide
open race in many categories. That coin toss from No Country For
Old Men - the one that determined whether a slow-drawling
petrol station attendant lived or died - might have been useful for
the academy’s 5800 members this year.
Let’s start with %26#133;
BEST PICTURE
The bookies have the corporate thriller Michael Clayton
at long odds, though Hollywood’s reverence for George Clooney could
help its slim chances. Like Little Miss Sunshine last year,
Juno seems too indie and comic to triumph at Hollywood’s
biggest show. The British period drama Atonement also seems
an unlikely winner for never quite delivering the emotional impact
of Ian McEwan’s celebrated novel. The epic oil drama There Will
Be Blood invested in grand themes and delighted many critics
but its climax and biblical extremes veered towards melodrama. The
towering achievement, despite
an ending that was more unsettling than satisfying, is the Coen
brothers‘ suspenseful Midwest thriller.
Likely winner No Country For Old Men.
Should win No Country For Old Men.
BEST DIRECTION
Masterful work from the Coen brothers, elevating the thriller
genre as Martin Scorsese did with The Departed did last
year, could win them their first directing Oscar in a career that
has included gems such as Barton Fink, Fargo and The Big
Lebowski. But an upset is definitely possible given the
wonderful inventiveness of Julian Schnabel’s The Diving Bell And
The Butterfly, which takes the viewer inside the mind of a
paralysed man, and the critical support for Paul Thomas Anderson’s
There Will Be Blood. The outsiders are Jason Reitman for the
cleverly idiosyncratic Juno and Tony Gilroy for Michael
Clayton.
Likely winner Coen brothers or Julian Schnabel.
Should win Coen brothers or Julian Schnabel.
BEST ACTRESS
The revered Julie Christie, the British star of Dr
Zhivago, Fahrenheit 451 and McCabe Mrs
Miller, is widely considered a certainty for her wrenching
performance as an Alzheimer’s patient in Away From Her,
which would repeat her 1966 Oscars win for Darling. But she
is up against a strong field. Ellen Page was a revelation in
Juno, Cate Blanchett dominated the screen in the muddied
Elizabeth: The Golden Age and Marion Cotillard was
exceptional as the singer Edith Piaf in La Vie En Rose. Only
Laura Linney, a struggling playwright in The Savages, is no
chance.
Likely winner Julie Christie or Marion Cotillard.
Should win Marion Cotillard.
BEST ACTOR
The bookies have Daniel Day-Lewis, who played a power-hungry oil
baron in There Will Be Blood, as the hottest favourite in
any Oscars category. While he lost when favourite for Gangs of
New York, the famously intense Irish actor previously won for
My Left Foot and seems unstoppable this year after
dominating the lead-up awards. The best of the other performances
came from
the magnetic Viggo Mortensen (Eastern Promises) and the
charismatic Johnny Depp (Sweeney Todd). George Clooney
(Michael Clayton)
has already won an Oscar recently. Despite excelling as the
father of a missing soldier, Tommy Lee Jones seems to
have little support for In The Valley Of Elah.
Likely winner Daniel Day-Lewis.
Should win Daniel Day-Lewis or Viggo Mortensen.
BEST SUPPORTING
ACTRESS
Sentiment ruled when the black veteran Ruby Dee, who played a
drug lord’s mother in American Gangster, won this award from
the Screen Actors Guild last month. But Amy Ryan has attracted
strong reviews as a single mother in the kidnap drama Gone, Baby
Gone, and Cate Blanchett was completely convincing as the young
Bob Dylan in I’m Not There. There’s no need for Tilda
Swinton (Michael Clayton) and the future star Saoirse Ronan
(Atonement) to worry about writing a speech.
Likely winner Cate Blanchett or Amy Ryan.
Should win Cate Blanchett
BEST SUPPORTING ACTOR
No contest. Javier Bardem as a monstrous killer in No Country
For Old Men has deservedly won everything going recently. His
closest rivals are Casey Affleck (The Assassination Of Jesse
James) and the veteran Hal Holbrook (Into The Wild),
with no chance for Tom Wilkinson (Michael Clayton) and
Philip Seymour Hoffman (Charlie Wilson’s War).
Likely winner Javier Bardem.
Should win Javier Bardem.
BEST ORIGINAL
SCREENPLAY
Thanks for coming, Nancy Oliver (Lars And the Real Girl),
Tony Gilroy (Michael Clayton), Brad Bird
(Ratatouille) and Tamara Jenkins (The Savages). One
of the best stories at the Oscars should be Diablo Cody’s
transformation from stripper to award-winning screenwriter for
Juno.
Likely winner Diablo Cody.
Should win Diablo Cody.
BEST ADAPTED SCREENPLAY
The Pianist screenwriter Ronald Harwood (The Diving
Bell And The Butterfly) and the actress turned writer-director
Sarah Polley (Away From Her) must be some chance. Less so
Paul Thomas Anderson (There Will Be Blood) and Christopher
Hampton (Atonement). But the Coen brothers should win for an
outstanding adaptation of a Cormac McCarthy novel.
Likely winner Coen brothers.
Should win Coen brothers.
BEST DOCUMENTARY
FEATURE
The Australian producer Eva Orner is nominated for Taxi To
The Dark Side, which examines the Bush Administration’s
sanctioning of torture in the fight against terrorism. It shapes as
an outsider against Michael Moore’s Sicko, on the failings
of the US health system, and No End In Sight, about the US
occupation of Iraq.
The biggest certainty is that there will be some shocks along
the way. Last year, it was Eddie Murphy getting beaten by Alan
Arkin. The year before, Brokeback Mountain by Crash.
Given the darkness of so many movies and the way a win can make and
break careers, it seems likely there will be blood.
The Academy Awards are on Sunday night in Los Angeles (Monday in
Australia).

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Related posts

The Upton factor

Friday, February 22nd, 2008

A creative renaissance is in the wind, and like Lewis
Carroll before him, Andrew Upton is seeing sunny times through the
looking glass, writes Russell Skelton.
Andrew Upton is a sunny optimist. With the Howard era consigned
to history he believes there will be a freeing up of ideas and a
healthy engagement of contentious issues.
“The culture wars reduced issues to black and white. People were
lionised or demonised. Ambiguity became the enemy,” he says.
“What I hope we will get now is a re-engagement of ideas that
were off the agenda. The most important thing for the arts is not
money, (that is the second most important thing), but the community
in which they take place.”
At 42, Upton appears relaxed and confident about his place in
the world. He was apologetic about turning up late for the
interview, a victim of Sydney’s gridlocked CBD. Dressed stylishly
for an official function he had just attended, he had all the
appearance of what Paul Keating might describe as the “boy next
door”.
Upton, the accomplished playwright, and Cate Blanchett, his much
acclaimed actor wife, stand at the heart of what many in the arts
industry hope will be a creative renaissance under the Rudd
Government. As artistic co-directors and CEOs of the Sydney Theatre
Company, they are powerfully placed to shape and nurture a fresh
arts agenda.
The couple have never viewed the worlds of politics and the arts
as unconnected spheres. On taking up the directorship in
controversial circumstances - amid resentful mutterings that they
had no managerial experience and the position should have been
advertised - they wasted no time in connecting the dots between
theatre and politics. The theatre complex, located at the Wharf in
the Rocks, should be environmentally relevant with a minuscule
global warming footprint, they said.
The forthright declaration was made at a time when the Howard
government was still in the grip of the coal lobby and climate
change denial. Upton and Blanchett later signed a petition calling
on former environment minister Malcolm Turnbull to dump Gunns’
Tasmanian pulp mill or be dumped. The couple are reported to be
spending more than $1 million on making their 1926 Hunters Hill
mansion self-sustaining.
Upton does not believe the culture wars are over or that the
election of the Rudd Government will result in a wave of dreary
politically correct theatre. He says there is an inevitable healthy
tension between the creative arts and the publicly elected.
“Artists will always produce works that make politicians feel
uncomfortable and inevitably there will be the response: ‘For God’s
sake, why don’t you shut up’.”
I interviewed Upton at the Wharf soon after the opening of
Blackbird, a play directed by Blanchett. It was a
sparkling day and the playwright was in an expansive mood, clearly
enjoying the critical success of his wife’s directing, the
impending management challenge and birth of their third child in
April. The conversation ranged way beyond the agreed subject of the
interview: Upton’s libretto for Alice Through the Looking
Glass.
Blanchett’s directing of Blackbird preoccupied the
critics who read the production as a sign of perhaps the risky,
even confronting, artistic direction the Upton-Blanchett management
would bring. Written by David Harrower, the play explores the
sexual and emotional relationship between a 12-year-old girl and
her 40-year-old male neighbour. The script covers the taboo terrain
negotiated so brilliantly by Vladimir Nabokov in Lolita,
although without the insight, subtlety and originality. It was
Blanchett’s second outing as a director.
Upton was open to all questions, engaging and enthusiastic about
his current work and plans for the STC. He sees the Wharf as a
creative centre where the best of Australian theatre - playwriting,
acting, directing and set design - can be shown for national and
international audiences. He aspires to create a milieu that will
attract talent from overseas. “I know Phil Hoffman (the Oscar-
winning actor directed Upton’s play Riflemind) is going to
want to come back, he just loved the way Australian actors approach
their work.
“Sydney really needs to pull its socks up, it’s been too reliant
on excellent wine and spectacular sunsets. We are a society, not an
economy. The arts gives a city international appeal, we want people
to come to Sydney because of what it offers apart from a glorious
harbour. That philosophy has worked for Melbourne, which is in
great shape; the rich arts culture makes it a real
destination.”
As for suggestions that he and Blanchett have no management
experience, Upton says that this was fully taken into account by
the board.
The company had been set up in such a way by former artistic
director and CEO Robyn Nevin that internal structures made
management less of an issue.
“The bad side of politicking comes about from bad management.
When we are all on a par and contributing together there is less
need for intrigue, lobbying (because) the pockets of creativity are
involved.”
Apart from shaping the STC, Upton’s creative side has been
preoccupied writing Carroll’s libretto for the Victorian Opera. His
fascination with words and the way the mind recasts memory drew him
to Lewis Carroll and the children’s story Alice Through the
Looking Glass.
“When Carroll wrote Through the Looking Glass he
described (in letters to friends) how the weather that week was
sunny, but the weather patterns and records from that time, and the
Victorians kept accurate records, suggest it was overcast and
raining.
“I found that fascinating, how memory converts something grey
into a perfect day. It was wonderfully sunny in Carroll’s mind when
it was actually raining.”
Carroll’s ambiguity holds a special challenge. Alice on her
journey (which is also a series of moves on a chess board) is
constantly faced with puzzles about time, space and numbers. The
White Queen talks to Alice about having jam “tomorrow and . . .
yesterday - but never jam today”. Then there is the constant
dilemma for Alice of “living backwards” and “remembering things
before they happen”.
Upton, widely respected for his adaptations of such works as
Don Juan, Hedda Gabler and Cyrano de Bergerac,
found there were many levels to interpret the surreal world of
Carroll, the master storyteller who specialised in word play.
“Carroll’s word games are very English and, in a sense, undermining
of authority. If you compare Through the Looking Glass
with Alice in Wonderland there is a sense of decay of the
adult world and of authority. Alice is on a journey to become Queen
but there is also a darkness.”
For Upton it has been an extraordinary exercise, composing
blocks of words and sending them off to Alan John - best known for
his opera The Eighth Wonder - who then composes the music.
At each stage the opera is sung, workshopped, refined and
rewritten. Director Michael Kantor is also involved in the process.
Upton believes his words, whether for opera or theatre, are
inhabited by a rhythm, which he believes assists the composer.
So why does Lewis Carroll need to be sung if it is the subtle
word play and ambiguity that most characterises the tale for
children built around chess moves and barely disguised worldly
themes? “For me it became about singing because the story is
happening in a dream state, an enhanced state. Assuming the story
is happening to the characters rather than implied, the world
becomes heightened (by the music).
“It also fascinates me what the meaning of words are in the
context of an opera.”
As a writer Upton says his own work comes slowly: “It takes me
about three years to write something from scratch, for some people
it takes a year.”
He has resigned himself to the fact that during his
co-directorship he will write what he can. “I comfort myself,” he
says laughing, “in the knowledge that most writers like Shakespeare
and Pinter were heavily involved in the theatre.”
Upton, like the White Queen in Alice, knows or hopes he
knows what the future looks like for him.
He has been occupied for years with Oedipus, the King in Greek
mythology who unwittingly killed his father and married his mother.
The story appeals because it is about one deeply complex character.
“I am not saying I will do this but there are elements of that
story that appeal to me.”
Upton believes in the Australian theatrical identity, which he
sees in all sorts of forms including TV programs such as The
Chaser and The Norman Gunston Show.
It’s a tradition that reaches back to La Mama, the Pram Factory
and the Nimrod Theatre. “It often comes through a conjunction of
writers, actors and the production of a whole event. It’s raw and
astute.”
As for the future direction of the STC, he says that change
(after Robyn Nevin’s nine years at the helm) is inevitable and was
after all the fundamental reason why he and Blanchett were
hired.
“Changing things should not be seen as criticism of the way
things were done; it should be seen as evolution.
“Australia produces world-class interesting work; it is part of
why Cate and I came back. What we want to do is establish a flow so
that work goes out (to the world) and Australia is seen as an
incredible pool of talent and ideas.”
That, on reflection, seems a modest ambition given that over the
years the STC has launched and nurtured the careers of such actors
as Mel Gibson, Judy Davis, Hugo Weaving and two Oscar winners
Geoffrey Rush and one Ms Cate Blanchett.
Through the Looking Glass will be performed at
the Malthouse in May.
www.malthousetheatre.com.au

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Related posts

The Upton factor

Saturday, February 16th, 2008

A creative renaissance is in the wind, and like Lewis
Carroll before him, Andrew Upton is seeing sunny times through the
looking glass, writes Russell Skelton.
Andrew Upton is a sunny optimist. With the Howard era consigned
to history he believes there will be a freeing up of ideas and a
healthy engagement of contentious issues.
“The culture wars reduced issues to black and white. People were
lionised or demonised. Ambiguity became the enemy,” he says.
“What I hope we will get now is a re-engagement of ideas that
were off the agenda. The most important thing for the arts is not
money, (that is the second most important thing), but the community
in which they take place.”
At 42, Upton appears relaxed and confident about his place in
the world. He was apologetic about turning up late for the
interview, a victim of Sydney’s gridlocked CBD. Dressed stylishly
for an official function he had just attended, he had all the
appearance of what Paul Keating might describe as the “boy next
door”.
Upton, the accomplished playwright, and Cate Blanchett, his much
acclaimed actor wife, stand at the heart of what many in the arts
industry hope will be a creative renaissance under the Rudd
Government. As artistic co-directors and CEOs of the Sydney Theatre
Company, they are powerfully placed to shape and nurture a fresh
arts agenda.
The couple have never viewed the worlds of politics and the arts
as unconnected spheres. On taking up the directorship in
controversial circumstances - amid resentful mutterings that they
had no managerial experience and the position should have been
advertised - they wasted no time in connecting the dots between
theatre and politics. The theatre complex, located at the Wharf in
the Rocks, should be environmentally relevant with a minuscule
global warming footprint, they said.
The forthright declaration was made at a time when the Howard
government was still in the grip of the coal lobby and climate
change denial. Upton and Blanchett later signed a petition calling
on former environment minister Malcolm Turnbull to dump Gunns’
Tasmanian pulp mill or be dumped. The couple are reported to be
spending more than $1 million on making their 1926 Hunters Hill
mansion self-sustaining.
Upton does not believe the culture wars are over or that the
election of the Rudd Government will result in a wave of dreary
politically correct theatre. He says there is an inevitable healthy
tension between the creative arts and the publicly elected.
“Artists will always produce works that make politicians feel
uncomfortable and inevitably there will be the response: ‘For God’s
sake, why don’t you shut up’.”
I interviewed Upton at the Wharf soon after the opening of
Blackbird, a play directed by Blanchett. It was a
sparkling day and the playwright was in an expansive mood, clearly
enjoying the critical success of his wife’s directing, the
impending management challenge and birth of their third child in
April. The conversation ranged way beyond the agreed subject of the
interview: Upton’s libretto for Alice Through the Looking
Glass.
Blanchett’s directing of Blackbird preoccupied the
critics who read the production as a sign of perhaps the risky,
even confronting, artistic direction the Upton-Blanchett management
would bring. Written by David Harrower, the play explores the
sexual and emotional relationship between a 12-year-old girl and
her 40-year-old male neighbour. The script covers the taboo terrain
negotiated so brilliantly by Vladimir Nabokov in Lolita,
although without the insight, subtlety and originality. It was
Blanchett’s second outing as a director.
Upton was open to all questions, engaging and enthusiastic about
his current work and plans for the STC. He sees the Wharf as a
creative centre where the best of Australian theatre - playwriting,
acting, directing and set design - can be shown for national and
international audiences. He aspires to create a milieu that will
attract talent from overseas. “I know Phil Hoffman (the Oscar-
winning actor directed Upton’s play Riflemind) is going to
want to come back, he just loved the way Australian actors approach
their work.
“Sydney really needs to pull its socks up, it’s been too reliant
on excellent wine and spectacular sunsets. We are a society, not an
economy. The arts gives a city international appeal, we want people
to come to Sydney because of what it offers apart from a glorious
harbour. That philosophy has worked for Melbourne, which is in
great shape; the rich arts culture makes it a real
destination.”
As for suggestions that he and Blanchett have no management
experience, Upton says that this was fully taken into account by
the board.
The company had been set up in such a way by former artistic
director and CEO Robyn Nevin that internal structures made
management less of an issue.
“The bad side of politicking comes about from bad management.
When we are all on a par and contributing together there is less
need for intrigue, lobbying (because) the pockets of creativity are
involved.”
Apart from shaping the STC, Upton’s creative side has been
preoccupied writing Carroll’s libretto for the Victorian Opera. His
fascination with words and the way the mind recasts memory drew him
to Lewis Carroll and the children’s story Alice Through the
Looking Glass.
“When Carroll wrote Through the Looking Glass he
described (in letters to friends) how the weather that week was
sunny, but the weather patterns and records from that time, and the
Victorians kept accurate records, suggest it was overcast and
raining.
“I found that fascinating, how memory converts something grey
into a perfect day. It was wonderfully sunny in Carroll’s mind when
it was actually raining.”
Carroll’s ambiguity holds a special challenge. Alice on her
journey (which is also a series of moves on a chess board) is
constantly faced with puzzles about time, space and numbers. The
White Queen talks to Alice about having jam “tomorrow and . . .
yesterday - but never jam today”. Then there is the constant
dilemma for Alice of “living backwards” and “remembering things
before they happen”.
Upton, widely respected for his adaptations of such works as
Don Juan, Hedda Gabler and Cyrano de Bergerac,
found there were many levels to interpret the surreal world of
Carroll, the master storyteller who specialised in word play.
“Carroll’s word games are very English and, in a sense, undermining
of authority. If you compare Through the Looking Glass
with Alice in Wonderland there is a sense of decay of the
adult world and of authority. Alice is on a journey to become Queen
but there is also a darkness.”
For Upton it has been an extraordinary exercise, composing
blocks of words and sending them off to Alan John - best known for
his opera The Eighth Wonder - who then composes the music.
At each stage the opera is sung, workshopped, refined and
rewritten. Director Michael Kantor is also involved in the process.
Upton believes his words, whether for opera or theatre, are
inhabited by a rhythm, which he believes assists the composer.
So why does Lewis Carroll need to be sung if it is the subtle
word play and ambiguity that most characterises the tale for
children built around chess moves and barely disguised worldly
themes? “For me it became about singing because the story is
happening in a dream state, an enhanced state. Assuming the story
is happening to the characters rather than implied, the world
becomes heightened (by the music).
“It also fascinates me what the meaning of words are in the
context of an opera.”
As a writer Upton says his own work comes slowly: “It takes me
about three years to write something from scratch, for some people
it takes a year.”
He has resigned himself to the fact that during his
co-directorship he will write what he can. “I comfort myself,” he
says laughing, “in the knowledge that most writers like Shakespeare
and Pinter were heavily involved in the theatre.”
Upton, like the White Queen in Alice, knows or hopes he
knows what the future looks like for him.
He has been occupied for years with Oedipus, the King in Greek
mythology who unwittingly killed his father and married his mother.
The story appeals because it is about one deeply complex character.
“I am not saying I will do this but there are elements of that
story that appeal to me.”
Upton believes in the Australian theatrical identity, which he
sees in all sorts of forms including TV programs such as The
Chaser and The Norman Gunston Show.
It’s a tradition that reaches back to La Mama, the Pram Factory
and the Nimrod Theatre. “It often comes through a conjunction of
writers, actors and the production of a whole event. It’s raw and
astute.”
As for the future direction of the STC, he says that change
(after Robyn Nevin’s nine years at the helm) is inevitable and was
after all the fundamental reason why he and Blanchett were
hired.
“Changing things should not be seen as criticism of the way
things were done; it should be seen as evolution.
“Australia produces world-class interesting work; it is part of
why Cate and I came back. What we want to do is establish a flow so
that work goes out (to the world) and Australia is seen as an
incredible pool of talent and ideas.”
That, on reflection, seems a modest ambition given that over the
years the STC has launched and nurtured the careers of such actors
as Mel Gibson, Judy Davis, Hugo Weaving and two Oscar winners
Geoffrey Rush and one Ms Cate Blanchett.
Through the Looking Glass will be performed at
the Malthouse in May.
www.malthousetheatre.com.au

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Related posts

Archives

December 2008
M T W T F S S
« Nov    
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  

Other

Syndication


website statistic