No one’s too young for a play

Sunday, May 11th, 2008

At Assitej, the 16th World Congress and Performing Arts Festival for Young People taking place in Adelaide, visiting companies include the Makhampon Theatre Group from Thailand, which is happy to hear itself described as a form of family, community, university and even food centre. They are performing a Buddhist tale about perseverance. Australian group Zeal Theatre, is collaborating with the South African performers Ellis and Bheki to create a comic show about nationalism and sport.

From Israel, “this crazy country”, as director Norman Issa calls it, comes the Arab-Hebrew Theatre of Jaffa, which, as its name suggests, is determined to defy that country’s political divide.

“We’re not the Christian-Jewish theatre company, or the Muslim-Jewish,” Issa says. “We deal in languages, not religions. We’re a very new idea and the only theatre working like this in Israel, and while we don’t have many sponsors, and are very small, people love this place. We have many friends.”

Issa’s Arab-Hebrew Theatre of Jaffa has brought a two-hander called Ach Ach Boom Traach to Adelaide for the Assitej festival. He co-wrote the hour-long piece with Yoav Barlev and both men perform in it. The fact that he is Jewish and Barlev a Muslim, Issa says, is not the issue (although that’s one of the first things he says about the play). The issue is how any two people, whose languages distance them from each other, can find common ground.

The production is pitched at children as young as three, but it’s also suitable for people in their late teens, the top-end of the age spectrum covered in Assitej’s broad program. Issa reckons it’s for everyone. “This play is very simple, and very difficult,” he says. “Everyone finds their own level within this play.”

Its premise is that the two actors represent brothers who play together, quarrel, then make up, and quarrel again. “The balance of power swings back and forth.”

As their history unfolds in scenes spoken in what sounds to the audience like jibberish (Issa says it’s the “language of Jesus”, Aramaic), one thing remains constant: a prettily coloured box that dangles enticingly above their heads. This appears to be the prize they constantly fight over, as their bitter feuding becomes ever more violent and hurtful. Finally, when they have “settled down to an uneasy truce, the box opens up by itself”. Ach Ach Boom Traach poses the question to the audience: “What are the brothers fighting for?”

Issa is unapologetic when he calls his theatre political, even though he has his critics because of that. “Most people here (in Israel) don’t like political stories, they look, maybe make a noise about the political situation, and then nothing happens. Most people here, they look, and do nothing.”

That’s why he believes children are the hope for the future and theatre for children is his way of turning this hope into action.

“I love children,” he says. “If we can change children, maybe we can reach out for peace. These children in the Jewish community, many years on they will become soldiers and maybe they will be different people because of what they’ve seen. I believe in that. This is my fighting, here in this crazy country.”

The company is in its 12th year, and Ach Ach Boom Traach has been in development for several years, already touring to a long list of countries, including Uzbekistan, Armenia, South Korea and Japan. “It’s very interesting,” Issa says, “that children all over the world react at the same moments during the play. It’s amazing. The inner child is a child wherever you go.”

The key to touching that inner child is to make the experience live, and Issa is animated in his denunciation of the kind of education children are receiving by way of television.

“It has to be live,” he says. “The theatre is life itself, and you can smell it, the actors, the props. It’s not in a box, in your salon (lounge room). In the theatre, the magic is that you see the story happening now, right before you, not edited so you only see the best takes.”

He describes what happens to people who lose touch with the theatre, those who sit in front of the TV screen with a beer and a sandwich as a process of “becoming heavy”, physically and mentally. Issa’s Arab-Hebrew Theatre of Jaffa uses a minimalist set, lots of brightly coloured props, and the energies of its two actors to capture the attention and imagination of its audiences.

According to a growing number of specialists in theatre for children, there is no reason to draw the line there: performances can be directed effectively to babes in arms.

In the Assitej festival, the highly respected Adelaide company, Windmill, has two shows, Cat and Green Sheep, both directed by Cate Fowler, which are pitched to audience members as young as one, but according to Suzanne Oster, theatre can be effective for even younger babies.

Oster is the artistic director of Unga Klara, a division within the Stockholm City Theatre created in 1975 to cater for children and young people. She is attending the Assitej congress, with the support of PlayWriting Australia, to talk about just how young an audience theatre can, and should, target.

The ideal audience, she says, is, in fact, a baby: “Present. Here and now. Not concerned with what it’s having for dinner, doing tomorrow or said yesterday. Free from conventions. Hasn’t read the reviews. Receptive without bias or prejudice.”

Oster’s showcase production, which is not part of the festival but which she will be discussing with delegates at the congress, is Babydrama, designed to present to children as young as six months.

It tells the story of the journey from conception to birth, through to the moment of “meeting their parents and their own will”.

“As far as we know,” Oster says, “text-based performances of this calibre have not been done for such young audiences,” although a Norwegian project has been evaluating the success of dance, mime and puppet theatre for babies from birth to three years old.

That evaluation was so positive, Oster says, there is now a project called Glitterbird, involving the collaboration of several European countries, developing theatre for the newly born. “The more elaborate the productions were, the more alert, concentrated and carefree the child seemed to be.”

Unga Klara works with test audiences, and documents the reactions on film, in order to build knowledge about what works best.

“The fact that one cannot speak,” Oster says, “does not mean that one cannot understand what is said. Experience has shown that the capacity for understanding and assessing situations is present at a very early age. Creating full-scale theatre to the youngest children with all our know-how and passion is a cultural policy statement.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Related posts

Kazakhstan opens its first kosher restaurant

Thursday, March 20th, 2008

Kazakhstan, a steppe nation of 15 million with nomadic roots, has prided itself on being relatively tolerant towards other religions compared with other ex-Soviet states.
Kazakhstan%26#39;s chief Rabbi Yeshayah Cohen recited a prayer and greeted community members as the brick-and-wood tavern, called %26quot;Kosher%26quot; and financed by private investors, opened in the Kazakhstan%26#39;s financial capital Almaty.
%26quot;It%26#39;s an important event for all of us,%26quot; Cohen said as other visitors, clad in traditional black suits and hats, surveyed the restaurant%26#39;s elaborately painted walls and nibbled on dishes prepared in accordance with Jewish dietary laws.
Israel%26#39;s ambassador Ran Ichay said: %26quot;I used to say the best kosher restaurant in Kazakhstan is in my kitchen, but now it%26#39;s obviously going to change.
%26quot;There is a need for kosher food in Kazakhstan even after 70 years of Soviet rule, and that means something,%26quot; he said.
Kazakhstan%26#39;s tolerance, unlike its patchier human rights record, has been praised by the West which has criticised other former Soviet states, mainly Russia, for not doing enough to fight anti-Semitism.
In its report on anti-Semitism in 2004, the US State Department quoted Kazakhstan%26#39;s chief rabbi as telling officials in Brussels that %26quot;in his 10 years living in Kazakhstan, he had never faced a single case of anti-Semitism%26quot;.
Community leaders said the opening of the restaurant, tucked inside an old Soviet furniture factory, was a symbolic act of closure for many of Kazakhstan%26#39;s 30,000 Jews whose grandparents moved here as part of Josef Stalin%26#39;s mass deportations.
Jewish communities have coexisted with Kazakhs and Uzbeks for 2000 years.
The political upheavals of Soviet rule made more than a million of Jews abandon their homes across the former Soviet Union to look for better lives in Israel and Western Europe, although there are no official numbers on Central Asia.
Community leaders in Kazakhstan said some are now coming back, lured by Kazakhstan%26#39;s double-digit economic growth and echoing a similar trend in Russia.
%26quot;Jews always felt at home here, even in Soviet times,%26quot; Ichay said. %26quot;That is probably because of Kazakh%26#39;s nomadic past when they had little contact with outside conflicts, unlike other Christian and Muslim countries.%26quot;

Tags: , , , , ,

Related posts

The Leader of the Libyan Revolution Attends the Final Session of Arab-African Festival

Tuesday, March 18th, 2008

In the company of President Yoweri Museveni the Leader of the Libyan Revolution attended the Final Session of the activities of the 2nd Arab-African Festival in the Ugandan capital of Kampala in which youth from 42 countries took part.

As the Leader arrived, he was warmly welcomed by the Minister of youth Affairs and Social Development, Chairman the Arab African Youth Council and representatives of participating delegations.

Thousands of youth joined the leader ,lauding him for his pioneering role in the African unitary march towards the creation of the Arab African space.

The final session of the festival held under the theme Youth-Peace-Development was attended by Parliament Speaker, the Prime Minister, several members of parliament, secretary of the General Union of East and Central Africa, a representative of the Muslim League, the Mufti of Uganda, heads of diplomatic missions and international organisations in Uganda.

Folklore troupes played pieces from the African traditional and religious folklore.

A welcome speech was made at the ceremony in which the speaker said Great brother, we welcome you as the man of Africa who cares for its peoples and issues. we warmly welcome you in Uganda.

The Mufti of Uganda and the representative of the Catholic Church in Uganda also welcomed the Leader of the Libyan Revolution to the festival praying God to enable him and the Arab and African youth to work for the welfare peace and security of the Arab and African peoples.

The Arab-African youth called on the Arab and African governments to unite instead of divide, which led to the colonization of the Arabs and Africans and led to their backwardness.

The Arab-African youth called in their statement, which was recited at the end of the festival, on the governments to establish the United States of Africa and establish the Arab-African space, in a world where large spaces are being shaped.

They also called on Arabs outside Africa to join the giant space.

The statement called on Arab and African governments not to accept conditional assistance, and compensate for that by opening world market before Arab and African products, focus on establishing the Arab-African market, joint federal institutions and complete mechanisms for establishing the Arab-African trade zone.

The Arab-African youth called for transferring the authorities of the Security Council to the UN General Assembly.

They also called on colonial states to offer apologies to Arab and African countries for the colonial period, build cooperation bridges instead of the death boats and igniting conflicts in Arab and African countries.

The statement condemned allegations of freedom of expression used as a pretext by Europe to justify insult of religions and its symbols.

In this regard, the statement called for adhering to the sanctity of all the heavenly messages, promote inter-civilization and inter-religion coexistence and tolerance, and differentiate between terrorism and legitimate right of resistance.

The statement called for the formation of youth committee to help resolve conflicts, crisis and civil wars, especially in Africa.

The Arab-African youth declared their absolute solidarity with the Palestinian people, stressed the national unity of Iraq and ending its occupation, end the occupation of Golan Heights and, Sebta and Melilla, preserve the unity of Sudan, and called on Somali factions to lay down their arms and begin the process reconciliation.

The statement called for ending the Arab and African brain migration.

Uganda’s Minister of Gender, Labor %26amp; Social Affairs hailed the leader…she expressed gratitude and appreciation for the leader’s presence in the festival.

The Ugandan minister welcomed the leader in his second country Uganda…She said in her speech at the festival:

(I thank Muammer Al-Qadhafi for accepting the invitation to take part in the festival…I thank you very much and welcome in your second country Uganda).

The Ugandan minister praised the roles of the leader and President Museveni in African liberation movement.

She reviewed issues discussed by Arab-African youth during their second festival to help create a righteous environment, to enable youth of development and peace in Arab and African countries, in addition to the sports, cultural and economic activities held during the festival.

The Ugandan minister emphasized that the leader’s attendance at the end of the festival motivated youth to seriously work for accomplishing their objectives, which they decided to carryout.

Addressing the festival, President Museveni said that the Leader Mu’ammar al-Qadhafi was the man who made the fundamental change in Libya through the revolution that liberated Libya and achieved the historic change that made people depict Libya’s internal and foreign policy.

President Museveni hailed the Leader’s leadership of the battle of oil-producing countries’ people in the year 1971 in order to get the fair and true prices of this wealth, which had been being plundered by the monopolistic foreign companies for low prices of less than half dollar a barrel.

President Museveni hailed the economical change in Libya that shifted Libya from backwardness to progress by making use of wealth in the interest of the Libyan people.

President Museveni touched on the Leader’s great role to liberate Africa from colonialism and race discriminating regimes; and to support the African liberation movements in continuation of the African founding leaders’ struggle; among of whom, Jamal Abdunnasser, Ahmed bin Ballah, Ahmad Sekou Toure, Julius Nyerere and Kenneth Kaunda.

The leader addressed the Arab-African youth at the end of the festival, he emphasized that he adopted the issue Arab-African Union and the establishment of the Arab-African space…stressing that the only safe haven for Arabs outside Africa is by joining the African Union.

The leader explained that the Arab have been torn apart due to the new world map that is being shaped under globalization and the formation of large spaces…the two thirds that are in Africa are members of the African Union, and there is a big question mark in front the remaining one third outside of Africa on their position in the new world map?!

The leader pointed out that the one third of the Arabs outside Africa are in Asia, but they are not in Asia in the true sense, since part of them are on the Mediterranean Sea and they’re being attracted by the Mediterranean Sea, east of the Mediterranean and so on.

The other part of the one third, which is the Gulf and the Arabian Peninsula, they’re neither from the Middle East nor from Asia.

The Leader expressed fear that the one third out of Africa could become isolated areas and influence spheres for large spaces.

In his speech, the Leader of the Libyan Revolution stressed that it’s better to rely on youths and women’s forces to achieve the great historic transformation represented in establishment of the African Union or United African States, than the politicians’, because activities of the African Presidents, who are controlled by the constitutions and elections, were paralyzed; they only think about elections, campaigns and the remained term; this wouldn’t enable them of strategic thinking for Africa, its coming generations and establishment of the United State of Africa.

In his speech, the Leader reaffirmed to the Arab-African Youths that the African environment is a tribal one, which doesn’t belief in partisanship and elections that were brought to African people by the States of old colonialism.

He clarified that Africa, consisting of tribes, is a social organization; it’s system is natural and social, in which there is no class discrimination; unlike the west where the discrimination is; among capitalism, laborers, lords, nobles and public; therefore, the systems that suits Africa is the people’s jamahiri system.

In his address, the leader reviewed the strategic and historical influence which Qadhafi’s project for African Woman, Child and Youth will make in Africa.

He reviewed the tragedies of parenthood and childhood in Africa, which he gained first hand experience during his land tour across the continent, where he traveled 20 thousand km.

The leader explained that the tragedy made him present a bill on personal status in the continent to 8th session of the African Union Conference in Banjul, to make family, marriage, divorce, motherhood and family care respected in the continent, and to make it avoid the political and social risks caused by the presence of deformed generation in the future.

In this regard, the leader indicated that the tragedies caused by lack of family care in the continent, especially on the part of fathers towards their children, a matter that made rebel movements, which have spread in Africa, find the opportunity to recruit them and make fight in the jungles and deserts.

Just as these children fall prey to disease, thieves and trade, even with their body parts.

The leader called on woman and youths forces in Africa to support the unitary bill, just as he called on youths to respect and sanctify their family lives.

The Leader of the Libyan Revolution exposed, in his speech, the true goal of the Christian missions in Africa. He clarified that the objective of these missions behind teaching Christianity to Africans is to control them spiritually and to keep them in loyalty of the Christian church in Europe and in America, despite that Jesus was sent neither to Africa nor to Europe; to which Christianity was, by chance, transferred, but he was sent to the sons of Israel to correct the doctrine of Moses.

The Leader stressed that Africa, which is suffering from famine, diseases and thirstiness; does not need to learn Christianity, but agriculture, industry and health; indicating that if volunteers of the European and American church want to assist Africa, they should help African in combating diseases, in education and how to utilize river and lake water in agriculture.

The leader emphasized in his address that the establishment of the United States of Africa, African gaining a permanent seat in the UN Security Council, demanding compensation from colonists of the continent for the colonial period and building a modern industry and agriculture in Africa would only be realized by clean revolutionary leaderships, which have a serious unitary African agenda, which they believe it would unite Africa, and so that the continent wouldn’t once again fall prey to the colonial forces.

The leader called for holding on to serious clean African leaderships, who have a national program such as presidents Museveni, Mugabe, Campoare, Wade and the other African leaders like them.

The leader stressed that the serious clean African leaders shouldn’t be restrained by imitated constitutions, elections, parties and limited presidential terms, which were imposed by the west and made accepting it a precondition for offering assistance.

The leader urged youths to reject all the foreign pressures being practiced by the progressive and rich nations, which plundered Africa’s wealth and made their fortunes from it, and which should provide assistance without setting conditions, rather they’re dictating partisan and Western elections to Africa.

He also urged the youths to once and for all stop immigration to America and Europe, and to remain in Africa, which is still a very rich continent in spite of what was plundered.Libyan

The Leader of the Libyan Revolution reaffirmed that the use of arms and power to solve internal political crises in Africa is backwardness.

The Leader stressed that all African-African disputes and conflicts, from which the continent is suffering now, can only be resolved by the indigenous African will, and not by that one imported from America, Russia, Europe or China.

At the end of his speech, the Leader of the Libyan Revolution reaffirmed relying on this festival, which is gathering together the Arab and the African youths, wishing that it would be an annual event, because this era is the era of rapidness that necessitate rapid actions.

The Leader of the Libyan Revolution called on the non-African Arab leaders to invest their oil and capabilities in Africa instead of Europe and Africa, emphasizing that investment in Africa is very useful for Arab and African union.

President Museveni was keen on greeting the leader after he finished his address…underlining the importance of issues the leader touched on in his address, especially the Arab-African Union.

President Museveni reviewed in his address the historical witnesses that affirm the Arab African correlation.

He affirmed that he concurred with the leader on resolving African differences through dialogue and not through violence.

The Ugandan President emphasized that Ugandan citizens used local African names for lakes in their country and do not use western colonial given names.

President Museveni reiterated keenness to further deepen revolutionary relations between himself and the leader…expressing appreciation and gratitude to the leader for responding to his invitation.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Related posts

Arts festival ‘always special’

Friday, March 7th, 2008

srichtersrichter

Trinity Lutheran Church will be filled with the arts this weekend for the 10th annual Liturgical Arts Festival.

“The title of the festival is ‘To God be the Glory,’ ” said Donna Williams, with the festival committee. “It is about all of us of different races and religions getting together and worshipping God in our own way, praising God in our own way. It’s art, poetry, whatever. And it brings us together.

“We’re more alike than we know or realize.”

The festival has two scheduled performances, from 7 to 8:15 p.m. Saturday and 2 to 3:15 p.m. Sunday in the sanctuary. Performances will include music, poems, readings, dancing and more.

Art from 26 artists, who were allowed to submit up to six pieces each, also will be on display in the community room from 2 to 4 p.m. and 6:35 to 7 p.m. Saturday and noon to 2:30 p.m. Sunday.

Williams expects between 150 and 200 to attend the festival.

Refreshments will be served after the performances.

“(The festival) is always special,” Williams said.

Victoria Pedersen sees it that way, too. But this year, she is the featured artist.

“I am so pleased they thought the things I create are important enough to give me that distinction,” Pedersen said.

The Argyle woman has been creating art since she could hold a crayon, but it’s only within the past 10 years that she has started to focus on her artwork more.

Her preferred mediums are charcoal, pastel and watercolor.

Pedersen said she recently started working with portraiture after taking a workshop with French artist Cecile Houel, but at her home, she is surrounded by wildlife, so it has a tendency to find its way into her work.

“I am a self-taught artist,” she said. “I have won some awards for my art, and some of my art has sold nationally.”

Pedersen will have six pieces at the show, a painting of a giraffe, a pencil sketch of a lion, a flower of some kind and three portraits — one of a Danish man who could be her ancestor, one of an African woman wearing a turban and a third of a little girl licking an orange Dreamcicle.

In addition to her artwork, Pedersen also will read one of her poems at the Sunday performance.

“I belong to the Society of Great River Poets,” she said, “and I have also won awards for my writing.”

Pedersen belongs to a number of art and writing organizations locally and in Iowa, and she’s been known to donate a piece of art or two to civic organizations for fundraisers.

But this weekend, the art will be on display.

And Pedersen is looking forward to it.

Tags:

Related posts

Shopping for religion

Wednesday, March 5th, 2008

Aside from the eccentricity of listing atheism as a religion, I couldn’t help wondering what my grandparents would make of this religious matching service. For that matter, what would they make of the idea that you could choose your religion at all? To them, religion was part of your identity, if not your DNA. You were born into it, grew up in it, and died with its prayers.

I noticed this ad because it was attached to the story of a new report on religion in America released by the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life. The researchers interviewed 35,000 Americans. Their figures show that Protestants now comprise a bare majority — 51 percent — of the population, and that the fastest growing group is the 16 percent now self-described as “unaffiliated.”

In my grandparents’ day, Americans were divided between the big three religions, sort of like TV networks: Catholic, Protestant and Jew. Now they have fragmented across a spectrum more like cable TV with satellite radio thrown in. The researchers describe a “vibrant marketplace where individuals pick and choose religions that meet their needs.” They surf their options.

I realize that for many Americans the idea of shopping for eternal truths is still jarring. Even contradictory. The movement from one ‘tradition’ to another may even suggest a kind of promiscuity — a faithless pursuit of faith.

Yet the idea of religion as a personal choice seems thoroughly American - as American as religious tolerance. And increasingly these two ideas may be related.

America has long been regarded as the most religious of Western nations. Six in 10 of us say that religion plays a very important role in our lives. Polls tell us that Americans are more willing to vote for a woman, a black, a Jew, than an atheist. Secular Europeans who look at those figures regard Americans as unthinking believers, conservatives following orders delivered from the pulpit.

At home the culture wars are often polarized between the religious right and the secular left. Leaders of both sides often characterize — perhaps caricature — religious members as people rooted in old ways and immutable ideas. But a huge number of Americans are mobile in pursuit of the immutable.

“We are, as a country, people who want to choose their own identity in a lot of areas of life and religion is one more part of it,” says Alan Wolfe of Boston College. There’s a difference between an identity that’s achieved rather than ascribed. Those who leave their childhood religions largely regard themselves as making their own individual choice. In this cultural context, even staying becomes an active decision.

When religion was cast in stone, it seems to me that we were more likely to cast stones. It may be the new pluralism and the framing of religion as a choice that makes us more accepting.

“You are the artist of your own life when it comes to religion,” says Miller. “This enables people to be more thoughtful about what they perceive to be true and right rather than inheriting what passes down to them.”

Indeed, if we’ve left our childhood traditions, if our children may leave ours, there is good reason to nurture what Wolfe calls “intolerance insurance.” The Pew study also shows that 40 percent of all marriages are of mixed religious traditions - including “none of the above.” We take coexistence pretty literally.

I don’t think Americans are just shopping for their beliefs in a trivial sense, trying on creeds like this year’s vestment, searching for the latest spiritual fashion. But we are a people on the move. About 40 million of us move to another home every year. So too, we drop in and out of church, U-Hauling our beliefs off in search of a better fit.

Today, we may shop in a spiritual mall. But what good fortune to find the mall paved over the old religious battlefields.

Tags: ,

Related posts

Al Qadhafi meets with Legislative Legal and Human Rights Committee

Saturday, February 16th, 2008

The leader of the Libyan Revolution met, yesterday afternoon in Tripoli, with the Legislative, Legal and Human Rights Committee of the Arab Transitional Parliament, which began its meeting yesterday in Tripoli . The meeting is devoted to set the statute of the permanent Arab Parliament.

During this meeting, an intellectual political dialogue was conducted between the Leader and the head and members of the committee in the presence of the Speaker of Arab Transitional Parliament, its Secretary General, Assistant Secretary, its Rapporteur and the Assistant Secretary of the General People’s Congress, about the Arab state of affairs in this era that surpassed the national state and where the world map has become consisting of huge spaces and entities.

At the outset of the dialogue, the Leader of the Libyan Revolution said Establishment of the parliament is a good move, but there is readiness to call for regional unities, tripartite unity or bilateral. The rulers lagged in this respect, especially the Arabs; the world has changed rapidly; the world’s map changed and became in a better form and on new bases; our past information and currency are no longer effective in the current market of globalization.

Unfortunately, when it is too late, they are still running behind development.

I frankly tell you, without any compliments; I neither cheat the Arab national, nor others; I tell the truth always; the past stage was the stage of the national unities; the states, before, were formed on the national basis.

When you say Persians, it means the Iranian state, that means the Persian nationalism forms the state of Iran; and when you say, for instance, Turkish, then this means the Turkish state; when you say China; what is China? China is a great nation, and so is when you say Saxon. Britons are one state; Italians are one State; Germans are one State; the American are one State; and any one enters America and attains its nationality, becomes an American, consequently the American state was formed.

The Unitarian Arabs struggled during that time in order to realize the unity of their nation, similar to those nations, but nothing was achieved, because there had been internal and external factors that played key role to frustrate the Unitarian project, no matter whether the project led by Jamal Abdul nasser or the project that was led by the Great Al-Fateh revolution or any other previous attempts led by revolutionary parties or national batish and Arab parties.

All of them tried and called for the national unity, serious attempts have been conducted; revolutions and coups took place, some people sacrificed; others sent to jail; some people lost their lives for this goal.

But, unfortunately that stage has passed; and the world entered another stage; it is neither a stage of nationalism, religion, language nor culture .. that means the huge demographic spaces, discarding sex, colour, language and religion.

The European Union is now on its way to become one state, with one currency, one army, one visa, and one central bank. North America is made up of 50 countries like us .. they created one space and one state. South America could set up a union or united states. Africa now we transformed it into the African Union from Organisation of African Unity with the ultimate goal of creating the United States of Africa.

The ASEAN group is forming up and will transform into one state at some point, with a unified currency and a common market. The south pacific, Asian nations and the Indian Ocean, India, Pakistan, Bangladesh and Srilanka despite the current animosity between India and Pakistan will be driven by the tide of globalisation to create one space to serve their common interests. China is a power of its own right, the Commonwealth of Independent States which is made up of former Soviet Union countries will follow suit.

This means that the world map is made up at most of 7 to 10 countries.

He who does not belong to a big space have no leverage, no huge consumer market no huge productivity and indeed no competitive edge in a multi-trillion exports market and hence no chance to survive.

The national state, which we got used to it, is diminishing, because it has lost much of components of its existence that taken by the globalization and other sides.

The Arabs have bad luck, there are now existing on improper geographical area .. some of them are in Asia, some in Africa; they are not in Asia, but they are at the edges of Asia; some of them are closer to the Mediterranean than Asia; some are separated in the Arab peninsula and in the gulf .. separated from Asia and Africa as well; they are alone and they are concerning neither the Mediterranean, Africa nor Asia; they are separated from all.

The Arabs live their lives in this way, wasting time, whereas the world is changing. In this world, there are serious men who are building new situation and new future, like the Europeans who are serious to build the strong Europe; the American, on the other hand, are serious to defend the United States of America despite of various ethnic divisions.

Only the Arabs who are not serious, as if they are not living in the world, now; it is regrettable thing.

Nowadays, nationalism, religion and language are no longer acceptable currency in this area of spaces.

Two third of Arabs are in Africa; Africa is their space; and when you mention another Arab state, or another place, then its has no concern to him and has no relation with it.

Africa is a demographic space; it is people, land and common soil .. common faith .. common future. There will be common market, one unit, one army, one central bank and one Africa identity; it must be like this before Europe, Latin America, North America, China, ASEAN, the independent countries and the Indian Ocean.

Arabs are torn before the globalization between Asia and Africa; we, the two third, are Africans; we are seeking to build Africa .. the African Union or the United States of African if we can in future.

The Arabs who are not with us in Africa do not take part this process .. one can tell you: I am not African, but can not tell you I am not Arab .. imagine, you are an Arab and you are an Arab, but he tells you this is an African and this is not.

Any one from Mozambique or from Ethiopia tells you: I am not an Asian .. I am an African.

Therefore, nationalism does not gather us, but the geographical location and demography do.

Yemeni tells you: I am not an African, although his is close to Africa; he tells that he is an Arab, but not African. Therefore the decision is whether he is an African or not; and it is not whether he is an Arab or not.

How do People from Gulf or Arab Peninsula answer if they asked to what entity they belong?

This the current reality. At last the Arabs start to think of a parliament. I am not sure if the notion came as part of the fashion prevailing in the world. They watched the world, and began to imitate, with no sincerity for there existed other things that take precedence over the parliament.

I mean establishment of such parliament is a good idea which we encourage. But if sincerity and a comprehensive thinking are there, there are a host of characteristics that come with entity. how can be the parliament alone?, is it a legislative or consultative?, if legislative, to whom it makes legislation?, what are the other authorities that are accountable to it?, where is the one judicial and executive authority?

It is good, a word that should be put in a sentence to make a cohesion.

If you put this before the Arab Summit, or elsewhere they will not respond, they will have no sincerity. If you ask them to create one state, one union, they will not respond. Arabs harbour more animosity to their fellow Arabs than to their enemy. For example Israelis are closer to Arabs than Arabs to their fellow Arabs, they embrace each other, while an Arab does not talk to an Arab.. there is animosity between a large number of Arab countries. a total break up, closed borders and threats of wars unfortunately.

What should Iraq say about Arabs who carried US tanks on their shoulders and entered them into the homes of Iraqi women?, what Iraq can say about Arabs in Future?, should he ally itself with the devil against the Arabs? so is the Palestinian who was betrayed by the Arabs.

The Arabs have quarter of the global petroleum reserve .. it is supposed that whole world should be bowing down to Arabs, but now the Arabs are the ones who are bowing down to Americans and Europeans .. they give petroleum and in addition to that they bow down .. it is regrettable, there is no seriousness.

The parliament is good now, but we have neither established another political entity nor political or economical unity.

Relations among Arabs are like the relations with foreign states .. any foreign state and foreign state .. they are Arabs and have one land; they are brothers, as if we are one family; but politically, economically and practically we are foreign states .. each one has its own currency .. the currency is dinar in this country, and the pound in that; each country has its own budget; this country has an army; that country has an army too; this has income; this does not have; this has friends; friends of this are enemy of that; we have borders separating us and passports; we have our own economy, clearance and accounts between us .. as if you are exactly dealing with a foreign state .. that means there is nothing.

It might be said that this is an Arab and an Arab, but from the economical, political and practical points of view, they are foreign states.

When it comes to our neighbours, Tunisia and others, Libyan interrelations with Chad and Niger are better off than that with Tunisia, Algeria, Egypt and Sudan. We have barbed wires and gates between us. This is our Arab situation.

I think that you commit yourselves to go down this road and cling to it. You could have a chance to attract Arabs to do something serious.

The Arab Parliament demands so and so, or it could well decide that there must be a political unity, a military unity a common market and one currency.

Having said this I must say I see a different reality, because it is hard for us in Africa to be with the Arabs in Asia though we are Arabs. Unity will never come because we are backward..if Arab unity involved the Arab north Africa, Syria and the Arab Peninsula, it would be an Arab state like Turkey occupying a part of Europe and other of Asia, and like Latin America where Mexico is Latin, as are central America and the Caribbean. If they are united they would have taken parts of North America and South America.

If Arabs united and had one state covering North Africa, Syria and the peninsula, then Africa was established, it would become Africa beyond the Sahara on its own and we are a state to deal with it on this basis. But this does not happened.

Now there are 5+5 in the western Mediterranean overlooking the sea and then there is the eastern Mediterranean which is seeking to establish a gathering bringing together Turkey, Israelis, Palestinians, Syrians, Lebanese, Jordanians, and Egyptians, it could be an other gathering. The western Mediterranean which is 5+5, and the Gulf Cooperation Council which stands on its own. As for the Arab Maghreb, it turned into 5+5, there is no Arab Maghreb ..there isn’t such story.

I’m the president of the Arab Maghreb, I say the truth ..there is nothing ..there is geography ..there are people, but on the side there is nothing ..there are no relations on the contrary there are animosities..closed borders.

I want to tell you these facts which you certainly know yourselves . I only will say to you after introducing it in this manner that you strive to highlight it and to defend whatever can be defended; if there is a possibility of establishing an Arab entity and Arab unity, you do not suffice by holding parliament meetings but it should be an instigating tribune that incites Arabs to build other establishments in parallel to the parliament if there is a possibility to establish that.

We, in Africa will establish some thing similar to a state, Africa could become one state in the future and no one will ask you, are you an Arab or not an Arab.

Though, we have in Africa different languages, races and religions where there are those who are pagans, there are Christians and Muslims. There are races in Africa such as the Bantu, others Negroes, Arabs etc. They also do not speak one language since each African country has several languages within and speak with each other in English, French, Portuguese and Arabic, which are the prevailing languages; but we will establish one entity and we have decided to establish African Central Bank, African Monetary Fund and African Saving and Investment Bank , there is thinking in one currency in the future and an African Army and African Court and African identity.

We are serious , this is a continent that will unite because it is afraid to remain a backyard or a mine for others. The Africans are worried about themselves and in turn they will unite.

For Arabs , our situation is in the form that we talked about).

Interposition of the Assistant Secretary of the General People’s Congress:

(This committee is legislative and legal; its function, during this meeting, is to organize constitutive act of the permanent parliament; Arab permanents parliament.

Brothers highly appreciate you, your efforts and struggle within the Arab context; you spoke of true things, which they agree on; they need your opinion and directives regarding the basic system of the parliament. They will adhere to the first idea you have presented, which is the idea of finding parallel institutions with the parliament to make it effective).

Interposition of Arab Transitional Parliament:

The point touched on by the Leaer is an important point.

It is well known, brother Leader, that you are a unitarian and you have been calling for the Arab unity since eruption of the Great Al-Fateh Revolution; the Revolution erupted on a unitarian basis, but your inspirations have not been realized, not because you were not right; it is because proper circumstances were not available .. this is the situation.

In my opinion, there is no Arab unity without the will of the people; I am sure that the majority of the people in the Arab countries want the Arab unity.

The Arab parliament is, now, a reality; there won’t be any chance for success if it remains as one institution .. There should be supporting institutions: Arab Fund Institution, Arab Joint Bank, Arab Market and the Arab Joint Court.

If these institutions are available, they will lead to an Arab solidarity hope that reaches the unity in another form, not immediate merger unity, but in future.

You, the Leader, have said very important words that the world consists of entities; and there are entities still being formed .. before collapse of the Soviet Union, there had been no approach in Latin America, there had been no approach in the Asia tigers who are, now, the strongest economical power following the industrial world .. where are we compared to those? The words you have said are very important and so clear).

The Leader:

(your are demanding it ..we will move from the constitutional bases. You say we decided this and this in the parliament’s constitution .. each time you bring out this book and open it in the future and you say the constitution provides for this and that and do this, and then you will have reference in your argument with the rulers).

Intervention by a member of the committee:

Brother Leader, surely what you said reflects a tragedy which existed in the Arab world, but the Arab peoples still believe in that we belong to one Arab homeland .. the fresh attempt which you kindly referred to views the issues before it through this perspective that it does not represent the Arab officials.

An example of this is the last Arab summit which took a decision to reactivate the Arab initiative, the decision was refer to the Arab parliament for opinion, the parliament was so brave as to pinpoint the weaknesses in the decision and sent them to the next Arab summit .. I mean there is no logic in keeping the issue of return vague and inconspicuous and there is no logic in keeping the issue of normalization subject of foggy explanations. There was a great deal of braveness.

A request was referred to us for drawing up a strategy for Arab National Security. The Libya takes big credit, because this the land on which hosted the final session during which we drafted the strategy. there were contributions from all, now it before the next Arab Summit.

The Arab parliament as the president said is need of support. It acts as a representative of peoples not regimes. I was amazed when I joined the parliament by the distinguished level it reached, all members are thinking as Arab deputies. This boosts confidence because they are not concerned with sensitivities and ongoing problems.

Therefore we are optimistic, and we hope as the president said to be able to receive your support especially now through your prominent role and your instigation of other Arab brothers.

There had been several unity processes, I always remember when at the university that every two or three years there is a unionist project coming from the Libya, you offered material assistance I have all the records.

Now there is a chance that the parliament start with the statute that reflect its nature as a real parliament that does not represent official interests but that of the Arab citizens.

We hope you wish us success and to give your instructions to start the requested assistance moral and material.

Brother Leader:

Ok I will.. as I said this is a good step that should not be forsaken .. it a chance to draw the constitution. implicate them in constitutional clauses and start your struggle thereof.

There should be a voice for the parliament in accordance with the constitution and a chance for it to become like the European Parliament, to have a say at least over in many issues, because its voice is heard.

Interposition by one of the Committee members:

We know that the world in 50 years from 3– 50 years will change dramatically where countries will disintegrate , others will disappear and others will weaken.

This change that will take place will affect both the Arab and Muslim world , the governments will not remain in their present form, the world will be run by multi-national companies . Those who write in this subject that the insurance companies will control every thing, sports’ companies will control everything. That means the current FIFA model and even armies will consist of mercenaries, that means privatization even in the war fields.

These are the schemes of the super powers at this level.

We believe that Allah loves us as we believe that Allah loves His insistent servant and despite all the set backs in Arab unity, but the role of Libya and the Libyan Leader, that is your honorable person must continue in clarifying the vision for what the Arabs are to expect as a nation, identity , values and as a culture. This is the first direction.

The second direction is that the Arab boom now in the field of oil where Arab countries have gained huge profits, So why the Libya would not take an initiative at the Arab and even Islamic level in order to rationalize regimes and establishments to invest this big opportunity provided by this oil boom , so that our wealth will not be wasted only in construction.

The third point , I always wished and hoped while I was a student in France to come to Libya within the framework of student unions to support Libya and to support your leadership, that this country becomes the land of knowledge, to become a big refuge to form the Arab immigrant and non-immigrant generations at the knowledge and sciences levels, because I believe that there are Arab youth and Arab expertise and what the Libya provides in this respect will be the biggest service to be offered to the Arab homeland and to Islam ).

Thank you.

The Leader: ( You may present these ideas that you have in writing ).

Interposition by another committee member :

Brother Leader:

First of all I am very grateful to be in your presence , all of us know your stands towards the Arab nation as well as towards the peoples yearning for freedom.

Brother leader:

The Arab world or the Arab nation tried affiliation with the Eastern bloc and it failed, they tried affiliation with the western bloc and we know the meaning of dealing with the western bloc and the credibility of this bloc in its dealing with the Arab nation , and whether they actually gave us a helping hand to progress or the contrary is the case.

Brother leader:

I hope that with your wisdom you explain to us the importance of this Arab Parliament in the future and why not hold a meeting for our rulers to support this parliament.

So, my only request is with your wisdom and well-advised opinion to be our helper in this particular subject).

Interposition of another Committee’s member

(In the name of god , most gracious, most merciful

We are very happy to meet the Leader; we have been and still following the thought of Brother Mu’ammar Al-Qadhafi on the Arab unity from the ocean to the gulf.

We live in an era - as you said your excellency the Leader- that believes only in the regional blocs, especially the in economical and the technical aspects; regretfully the Arabs are torn and dispersed; I do not know why.

The conversation made me to talk about the Arab Maghreb; and you are presiding the Arab Maghrebian Union; you said in your right speech that there are closed borders and problems .. your excellency the Leader, you can help settlement of the existing problems in Africa, which became well-known at the international level.

In terms of the Arab parliament, we have a mission of struggle; you know that struggle has no specific time .. the struggle is continuing .. we may fail and may loose today; but it is important that we have an Arab mission for resistance; for fighting the enemy of the Arab nation.

It is regrettable as an Arab citizen to witness what is going on in Gaza and other places other than Gaza, while the Arabs are watching; the Arabs went to Annapolis .. I said in an Arab Parliament meeting, what the Arabs will harvest from Annapolis? I mentioned, in my last interposition before the Arab parliament, the Arab summits held since 46 .. at that time there were only seven countries .. since 46, summit after summit, what have we got from those summits?

A bunch of Israelis rejoicing on the Arab homeland .. that means Arab money and resources are used to hit Arabs .. until when?

For the unity, your excellency the Leader, please think and return to struggle for the United Arab States, if god willing, and not only for the United States of Africa).

Intervention by an other member of the committee

Brother Leader:

I would like to add my voice to colleagues who admire you for your unionist stance.

It is evidently true that your struggle history proved that you are a man of unitary thought and you follow word with deeds. History shall stand witness to this. This what you do in the African continent as part of your aspiration and thinking.

Brother Leader:

The Arab Parliament has made an indication ..that it wanted to remove these obstacles ..that at the onset of the parliament when there was an election of the president’s post, some Arab heads of parliament stepped forward thinking they have the right to be elected to the post, but the parliament broke off that rule and elected a member of parliament to the post.

The move did not impress some of the presidents of Arab parliaments who were surprised by the thinking of the parliament members.

Also an other example some presidents did not like a member who has finished a year in the post so thy sought to remove him but to no avail.

That’s what we do now in the statute of the Arab Parliament.. that the Arab voice should not be held captive to any Arab official..it should be free.

Interposition by another committee member:

In the name of Allah .

We are very pleased to be here in this blessed country among our brothers , we are in this audience with a father and leader who is a witness to a long history and big events.

According to my conviction and understanding, the Arab nation , by the grace of Allah, is to be the leading nation of the lost world where the powerful humiliates the weak . This nation believes in one faith and one Book that constitute the basic rules that deserve to unite this Ummah and lead it forward.

We appeal to our Brother leader to support this base and to seek to unite the Arab nation which is distinguished from other nations . It has one Lord , one Qibla and one Book , so this Ummah is nominated to be the guiding light to other nations with different creeds.

I also appeal to Brother leader with his wise guidance, experience and knowledge , to support science in the Arab world. This Arab nation had ruled a large part of the globe for hundreds of years. It is a nation with bright history and bright pages. many countries were destroyed by wars , but they were rebuilt by science and Japan is a case in point.

The Arab youth are in need to be embraced by universities in the Arab countries in order to by the foundation for their Ummah, instead of being seduced by foreign universities, while the Arab nation is in need of its youth.

Interposition of another Committee’s member

(Your excellency the Leader:

Responsibility of this committee is to set the basic system of the Arab parliament; it has a number of options and a number of questions, to which it is trying to give answers.

In principle, the goal that prompts the committee and targeted by the parliament is to make the parliament active, not marginalized and not ordinary bureau in the Arab League or the Arab work that is not serious.

The parliament is seeking to be active, membership of which is directly selected by the masses or at least by selection of institutions, which are selected by the people; the membership term and privilges given to the members permit them to suspend or to intervene the Arab general political, legislative affairs.

So that we can bring legislations, directions and policies close; and we can for example impose the institutions that you have mentioned, such as the Common Arab Market, or its executive council to implement the legislations issued by the parliament or to revive the institutions that had been involved within the Arab League, among of which Arab common defense council or similar councils related to this work.

We are still transitional parliament; the parliament is still in its image before the official Arab system; in fact it is a decorative institution .. decoration means in the foreign language just a form which has no meaning.

Intervention by an other member of the committee

I think we are convinced that the nationalistic current is weakened and in shambles.

I have a proposal that we take the opportunity of the 40th anniversary of Al Fatah, why doesn’t Tripoli, Libya become a gathering place for Arab professionals those of nationalist affiliation lawyers, doctors and pharmacists ..to creat a network of civil Arabist society that lend support to the parliament because the Arab system is defective and it only breeds defective institution.

As you said at the begining to whom we legislate? if the Arab parliament a consultative body ,what’s its consultative role?

Even if we wanted to draw the text of the statute, I disagree with the brothers, that even if the statute gives us the legislative powers we will collide with the national constitutions.

The second issue is that our national parliamentary experiences have failed.Generally we do not have parliaments. The national parliaments do not show up on the stage either on the democratic level or the basic level, many of our countries do not have parliaments in the first place.

I think we have to do much more in coming years on the popular dimension and the civil society level.

If we fail to create a functioning network of a civil society that believes in Arabism and nationalism, and believes in Arab common action there will always be a gap.

Another interposition by another member of the committee:

Thanks to you and to brothers at General People’s Congress.

Secondly, and as Mr. Abdul Wahab Abu Sanaan, we hope that the direction be towards the United Arab States before the United States of Africa.

We were young children in the 70’s of the last century when, Muammer al-Gathafi came out with the banner of the revolution in Libya, we were following the nationalist trend through

Abdel-Nasser and other brothers.

I consider that the existence of the Arab Transitional Parliament at this particular time is a boost forward to a joint Arab popular action . This gives a proposal of the strength and power of the Arab nation.

I mean that I have a different view regarding the weakness issue which exists in political action and in coordination between Arab countries.

The other thing , I have been here in Tripoli, Libya, less than 24 hours and I really felt that I am in my own country . This feeling gives an indication that the Arab people is one people I came from the far Arab East and in one night only I felt at home.

I believe that these are essential basics which are strong motive , your destiny is to be in this leadership, your destiny to be in one of the Arab countries and we have great deal of respect and appreciation for you.

The Arab Transitional Parliament need your support and we hope that through this support, then the sessions of the Arab League, God willing, will be the stimulating force for joint Arab action ).

Interposition of another Committee’s member

(this meeting is important, on behalf of my brothers; I would live to give a brief on the Arab parliament works.

Since our start in 2005, we have achieved a lot; first of all, we established our internal rules that regulate our work, we selected the council bureau consisting of the chairman, deputies and the Chairmen of the committees; we had distinctive stand that supporting the Arab causes during the past three years or the past two and a half.

We held two special sessions to support Lebanon during the war and the situation in Lebanon; we held a session for Somalia, Darfur and Iraq; we also had special meeting for the situations in Gaza.

We had supporting stand for Somalia, not only though by meetings, but also by stances and statements; because all we had was our voice pens and thought by which we support the Arab causes, no matter whether with the international parliament or with the national and regional parliaments; this role will continue.

We thank you

- The Leader

(I am supporting you .. this is for sure and I am ready to examine some of the drafts that you are going to use to establish this constitution.

Interposition:

We will refer it to you through brother, Ahmed , God willing.

The leader:

I am ready and under your disposal .

Thank You May Allah bless You.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Related posts

From freedom of speech to blasphemy

Friday, February 1st, 2008

by Bita Ghaffari

(Press TV)

There is a border between freedom of expression and blasphemy - a border that should never be crossed.

Attempts to confuse the concept of free speech with one that is inciting, provocative, or offensive has a long history.

Attacking Islam and striving to portray it as a religion harboring violence and extremism is not a new phenomenon. However, there have been renewed attempts to distort the image of Islam through profane utterances or writings concerning Muslim sacred entities in recent times.

Certain na茂ve political figures resort to sacrilege as a means of working their way up the ladder of political success. Austria’s Susanne Winter is one such figure.

Her blasphemous remarks regarding the Prophet of Islam Muhammad (PBUH) and the assertion that Islam should be ‘thrown back where it came from, beyond the Mediterranean Sea’ only expose her prejudiced and ignorant mindset. Can that be considered an instance of extremism?

Apparently, she made the hate speech with the intention of garnering massive support at the city council elections - a strategy which failed to work.

Winter’s comments even drew immediate condemnation from several top-ranking Austrian authorities including Chancellor Alfred Gusenbauer who said she had absolutely no right to attempt to undermine the values and beliefs of an acknowledged religion.

She was also reprimanded by Vice-Chancellor Wilhelm Molterer, Foreign Minister Ursula Plassnik and finally President Heinz Fischer who said the remarks were ‘intolerable and outrageous’.

Yet again, another Islamophobic European politician recently announced his plan to make a film with the clearly stated objective of attacking Qur’an, the Muslim holy book. Geert Wilders, the head of the Dutch far-right Freedom Party, announced he would release a 10-minute film to show his view that the Holy Qur’an, ‘is an inspiration for intolerance, murder and terror’.

He earlier proposed a ban on the Holy Qur’an. There are even fears Wilders might burn or tear up Islam’s Holy Book in the film. Threatening to commit sacrilege against the sacred book of 1.2 billion people? Is that not extremism?

French writer Robert Redeker in an article printed in Le Figaro caused offense to Muslims through his provocative remarks about the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) and the religion of Islam, but was defended and offered protection by the French government.

In 2005, a Danish newspaper infuriated Muslims around the world for publishing offensive cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH), which were later reprinted in several other European media under the pretext of freedom of expression. What are these if not vivid instances of extremism?

Having been introduced into the current political parlance, the words ‘terrorism and extremism’ are in sudden vogue. This is part of a scenario to instill a phobia of Islam and of the Muslims worldwide.

A review of the crime situation worldwide would reveal that most ‘advanced’ countries have crime rates which are several times higher than the corresponding rates in major Muslim countries. Not to mention that the number of lethal domestic assaults would have been much higher, in US for instance, had it not been for the availability and improved quality of emergency care and medical variables.

The mass media of the so-called civilized world keep branding Islam as a religion breeding violence, turning a blind eye to the fact that a great many lives are being everyday sacrificed in uncalled for wars that are waged by non-Muslims in the first place. Consider the civilian toll in hot spots like Iraq, Afghanistan and Palestine today.

Religions are for promotion of peace and love for humanity. Some, however, have been conspiring throughout history to misuse religion as a tool to accomplish their hideous ploys.

One need not be a passionate religious believer to realize that making profane remarks against other religions - be it Islam or other divine faiths - or arousing a sentiment of anger and disgust among followers of a certain faith is not a way to uphold freedom of expression, but a most unethical practice.

Interestingly enough, most European countries prohibit any speech or writing that denies the Holocaust but turn to advocates of liberty of expression when it comes to unfair and biased interpretations of Islam.

A German court recently sentenced Sylvia Stolz, the former lawyer of Holocaust revisionist Ernst Zundel, to 3.5 years in prison, and banned her from practicing law for five years.

Also, French judicial police summoned French revisionist historian Robert Faurisson on charges of attending an anti-Holocaust conference in Iran.

To date, Faurisson has been subjected to a long list of official and unofficial penalties from assault and battery leaving him with a broken jaw, to a suspended prison term of three months, a fine of 7,500 euros as well as removal from his university chair - for questioning the historic events surrounding the killings of European Jews by Germany in WWII.

France’s 1990 Gayssot Act makes it an offense to question the existence of crimes against humanity. It is one of several European laws prohibiting Holocaust denial.

Islam is a religion that is embraced by about 1.2 billion people around the world from a host of nationalities and races. That means one in every five people is a Muslim.

What therefore encourages some to try to blatantly desecrate Muslim sanctities and what good do they achieve from offending the beliefs of followers of the world’s second largest religion?

Islam is attracting an increasingly larger percentage of global population at a faster rate (2.9 percent) than the total annual population growth (2.3 percent).

The world today needs discourse among religions and cultures more than ever before. Followers of divine religions need to be vigilant and think twice before they fall for the ‘black propaganda’ intended to mislead.

The irony is that covert Western hands can be traced in creating the breeding grounds for extremist movements. First, the groups are mentored, funded and trained; later, they are reprimanded as radical Islamist groups involved in terrorism.

Violence is committed by groups that are bred and fostered by Western powers to give a distorted impression of Islam.

Let us not be carried away by the tide of provocations and deceptions. Religions are to shine the light of guidance throughout the human journey toward perfection. The faiths of Moses, Jesus, and Muhammad (PBUT) have all aimed to provide mankind with direction.

All throughout history, people’s religious sentiments have been provoked to sow the seeds of discord and enmity, by timeservers who think of nothing but quenching their insatiable greed for power and wealth.

Extremism comes into play where there is ignorance and deception. It is the duty of the elite to keep the public opinion from falling for such distortions of reality. There have been and still are numerous cases wherein Muslims have been the victims rather than perpetrators of violence and terrorism in recent history.

Extremism and terrorism are terminology propagated by hegemonic powers to justify invasion of foreign territories and plunder of their resources - those who live in homes that have been built at the expense of ruining other people’s homes. They need alibis to attack and invade; wage wars, and sell arms. What can serve their purpose better than clinging to the excuse of ‘fighting extremism’?

Tags: , , , , , ,

Related posts

The text of the Lbyan Leader’s speech via international mass media to put the African citizen

Friday, February 1st, 2008

In the name of God.

As the African Summit in Addis Ababa approaches at the end of this month probably after a day or two, since the summit as usual and as the high-level team formed by the president of the union to evaluate the state of the African Union noted.

It says that the summit conference is an effective process in its current position because it convenes for two days the first of which all speeches and a ceremonial programme. On the second day the heads of states start to depart leaving the issue to officials who leave them behind and such officials maybe a minister and not even a minister.

Therefore the team formed by the President of the Union noted this flaw in the summit conference so the team confirmed the ineffectiveness of the conference. By that it meant the summit conference because it is convened for only two days. The first day is a ceremonial one and is spent on speeches especially by foreign delegates who are normally invited to attend. On the second day, heads of state start to leave leaving the matter to officials. This is what the team noted.

Therefore I viewed that since there is time to make the African citizen informed and I want him as well as the brothers, leaders of African states, to listen to this address well before the summit. I mean this talk is not only for today, tonight or tomorrow because I believe I would not find a time like the rest of my colleagues to talk about the African Union as it should be. Because the time, as the team which reviewed the state of the union noted, that the summit does not have enough time to allow the presentation of ideas and elaborate and in-depth discussions to reach an outcome. So I avail myself of this opportunity to present and say the thing that we could not accommodate in the limited period of the summit which is two days. In fact it is only one day. Before I review these statements there is an introduction.

There are facts I would like to present and underscore. First I would like to draw the attention of the African citizens and my colleagues on the African continent that the Addis Ababa conference should be what it was intended to be. It would be a decisive conference because in this conference a conspiracy that could constitute a veto on the unity and future of Africa becomes clear. That is a conspiracy to sell Africa in the auction and to divide it or subdivide it among world forces and compromise its future and the future of its children. Or there would be justifications for all that had happened in the past eight years after the proclamation of the African Union and this matter would become clear in Addis Ababa.

If again there is procrastination and justifications which we are accustomed to it means there is a conspiracy and those who are responsible for its implementation will be proved by time in the future and the African people will hold him to account.

Therefore now procrastination started and the government of the union and unity of Africa started to roll as in the past, like a football. Whenever you reach it you kick it forward without holding it. So the unity has become like a mirage. If it is proved in this forthcoming summit that up until now they still roll the government of the union or enlarging the executive council or taking decisive decisions on African unity it means there is a luring force whose task is to sell the future of Africa and compromise it. God willing, this will not be the case before us.

Anyhow Libya, which has an effective role, is an serious African force and it is for the sake of Africa and not for the sake of Libya. I would like to explain that the enthusiasm of Libya for the unity of Africa and the strength of Africa and for the establishment of an African Union government like the United States of America, Europe, China, Brazil, and India. This enthusiasm is for the sake of the African continent as a whole and not for the sake of Libya only.

Libya’s and interest will be achieved by the unity of Africa, by the existence of African sovereignty safe-guarded by one African defence, one African economic force and by one African market.

But we must caution them that Libya eventually will not take part in selling out Africa. I personally will never contribute to the selling of Africa in the auction and I would like to inform the African citizens on the continent from the furthest point that if I discover there is treachery, bribery, compromising the future and destruction of Africa or the selling of Africa I will not never take part in this.

And the African citizen will be informed by me about this bitter fact if it did occur. And I would like to say that those who ask why Libya is enthusiastic about African unity or why Qadhafi wanted African unity with such vigour I would tell them that this is for the sake of Africa and not for the sake of Libya only.

For Libya if it viewed the issue as an issue of wasting time it has other strategic options. First, Libya is part of the Mediterranean sea and this in itself constitutes s global and strategic space. Libya can play a decisive role in establishing a space other than the African space which is the Mediterranean sea space. In this case Libya would benefit from its participation with a strong and advanced side and has modern technology and this European or Mediterranean side is welcoming Libya to be its partner. Libya is a lake of oil and gas and has about 2000km on the southern Mediterranean coast. I hope this will not take place and the desert would not be a divide between what used to be called in the past ‘black Africa’ and ‘white Africa’ or ‘Arab Africa’ and ‘black Africa’.

They always used to say sub-Saharan Africa. Regrettably this may occur if the Sahara becomes a divide and North Africa and foremost Libya turns its back to the desert forming a strong space around the Mediterranean. This sea is a sea of civilisations, the heart of the world and we fortunately are located in the Mediterranean and occupy 2,000kms of it southern coast. Then Libya has another space which is the Arab space and it can play a role in establishing an Arab space from North Africa to Iraq and this is an oil and gas force, human resources force, resources and strategic positions from Gibraltar to the Suez Canal to the Gulf of Aden to the Straits of Hormuz.

Libya is also part of the Muslim world extending from Marakesh to Indonesia and it may play a role there. One day a very strong Islamic space may be constituted on the basis of Islam. This may take place.

An African space, a Mediterranean space, and a European Mediterranean space will be constituted. That is where the Mediterranean sea joins Europe. We at least the revolutionaries in Libya, have no inferiority oppression and conspiracy complex. That is the West, Europe, the Mediterranean is something fearful that would overcome us and colonise us. Why not the contrary? Why not they are the ones who fear and say that Arabs or Muslims would colonise us or they would change our cultures or they may spread Islam. We colonised them for 800 years, we colonised the Iberia Peninsula for 800 years. We colonised Italy for 300 years.

Why don’t the Europeans fear and say this old colonialism may return again?

We have a culture, why don’t the Europeans fear it and say they have a culture and a religion, the final religion addressed to the entire people that they may spread it to us. They don’t fear, they say you are most welcome if you want to take part with us in the Mediterranean. Europe and the Mediterranean are most welcome. We don’t have such complexity, we may take part with Europe and the Mediterranean and merge with it in everything and we are not fearful. We have a culture, a religion, belief or faith and we have a great historic legacy and we changed the map of the world several times. The Abbasid, the Ummayad, the Ottoman, the Andulsian, Carthage, Al Gabila states - all such maps of the empires - we are the ones who made them and we reached as far as the gates of Vienna under the Pyrennes mountains. We don’t have a fear complex from merging with Europe and the Mediterranean.

If Africa is going to compromise its future we have ready strategic alternatives. But the African countries are the ones who are going to die because they don’t have the possibility to get our of this grave which is wanted for these countries.

Since the establishment of the Organisation of African Unity since 1963 - until now, that is about 40 years (about means more or less) which is more no Arab individual took the secretariat or assumed the post of the secretariat of the Organisation of African Unity. Nor the African Union Commission. From 1963 up to now., although one third of the Arabs are Africans. That is the speakers of the Arabic language in Africa. None of them assumed the responsibility for the post of Secretary General for 40 years. And eight years of the African Union. There is a conviction among the Arabic speakers who make up one third of the Arabs that they have no right to this post. Why? A tradition that Africa is black and they are the majority for instance.

However, we are now 150 million Arabs in Africa, that is Arabic speakers in Africa. We contribute 60percent to the budget of the African Union now. But it seems to me that this post became confined to non-Arabic speakers and that Arabic speakers are deprived of this post and we conceded. Now the African Union Commission is to be constituted. Obviously it is my opinion that this commission should be abrogated and replaced by the council of ministers or an enlarged executive council because the commission is without powers and without tasks and weight it is a dead body. And the commission cannot be relied upon.

The report by the team made up of president of the African Union says that the commission is characterised by inefficiency, lack of powers, and misunderstandings and responsibilities and and its relationship with the committee or representatives is characterised by tension, and mutal mistrust. This is its evaluation of the commission. It has no powers, no value and it is engaged with problems with the committee of permanent representatives and it is better for it to be abrogated and replaced by another executive body, a government or an executive council etc. However if there must be a commission why not one of the deprived for more than 40 years and who contribute 60 percent of the budget of the African Union and the Organisation of African Unity and whose number is 150 million, why shouldn’t they have the right to assume this post, the post of the chairman of the commission.

For instance we presented Ali Tereki. He is known to all African and he should be president of the African Union Commission. And the foreign minister of Gabon who is a candidate also to be deputy chairman and other candidates be commissioners and in this way the formation of the commission ends. This is without secret balloting by agreement of the African leaders. I noted that some were surprised. Why? How could Al Tereki from Libya, an Arab and from North Africa, why? As if there is a rule that nobody from this region has the right to assume this post. Until when will such deprivation and this illegitimate veto continue. If it is objected to in Addis Ababa it means there is a racist position. Why is there a racist position from the Arabs? Our African brothers have their justification.

First they consider Arabs immigrants from the Arab peninsula who came and occupied North Africa as they came and occupied Andulsia, the Mediterranean, southern Italy and elsewhere. The second thing, the Arabs not only accused but condemned by contributing to the slave trade in Africa and I announced this and recognised and condemned it strongly. I consider it a shame in the history of the Arabs especially the Arabs in Africa. In the Arab peninsula they treat the blacks as they treat slaves although slavery has no connection with the colour. The slave may be white, black or yellow and the Arabs contributed to hunting the Africans in the jungle as the Americans and the Europeans did. In fact the Arabs practised far worse racism than the racism of the West.

The West shipped blacks and used them like animals, muels, donkeys, camels and horses. As a physical muscle to cover swamps and pave the roads and build a new America and Europe. The Arabs however practised another racism: individualistic racism. They did not use them in such projects but they sold Africans and they processed them individually. The effects of this are still in Libya today and I am fighting such effects. We find that even in Libya social effects and I am against it and it should be abrogated. When there is a social event they bring a black family to cook the food. Why not a white family? If a white family wants to get a reward or money or knows how to cook why not a white family? Why should they only look for a black family to cook the food? Cooking could be done by a white or a black person. But this is the remains of existing Arab racism and we recognise it. When they bring folkloric groups they must be Libyan blacks. Why are the whites not the ones who beat the drums at such festivities. This is shameful and should be changed and it is the remains of racism that they practise. This is the racist culture of the Arabs. The Africans are aware of this and they know that the Arabs despise this race. They sold it and contributed to slavery. This is one of the things that made them that the Arabs should not assume a post. The position in the end is a racist position. The Arabs were initially racists and now the other Africans who are not Arabs are racist against the Arabs existing now.

The other issue that the Arabs in one period had a misunderstanding or shortsightedness during the phase of the liberation of Africa when they stood by the feudals and the sultans who were of Arab origin and sided with the Islamic communities. I mean the Islamic minorities in Africa. And no onw warned them against this mistake save Ahmed Ben Bella when he went to Jamal Abdel Nasser and told him Mr President there is a wrong strategic position exercised by yourself or by Egypt or by the Arabs. What is is? He told him you are making a broadcast inciting Muslims in Zanzibar and Tanjanika and Abyssinia and that region. But the Arabs there are feudals. They are sultans and kings and they are the remains of the old society and these countries want to get liberated. Then if you are attacking Nyere because the feudals in Zanzibar are against Nyere he is a liberation hero, an African hero. All African liberation movements are in Dar Es Salam.

Abdul Naser understood this and said correct and therefore there was a historic and strategic meeting between Jamal Abdul Naser and Nyere to liberate Africa and combat colonialism and racism. Revolutions that took place in Africa especially the socialist progressive revolutions, confronted the sultans, the remains of the Arab sultans, the sheikhs and the feduals who used to occupy vast areas of land enslave people and exercise slavery on blacks to the extent that during that period they asked leaders of the founding fathers of African Unity to deprive the Arabs from being members of the organisation. The Organisation of the African Union should be confined to sub-saharan Africa. Why? They said because the Arabs are racists.

This belief still exists today to a degree that when we say for instance Ali Tereki who is Libyan Arab to be president of the African Union Commission it arouses surprise. Some African leaders are surprised. They say, how, how? It means something new that breaks the custom that we made. The custom that there is a position against the Arabs.

If this takes place, let us suppose that they don’t accept Ali Tereki in Addis Ababa now it means, no doubt a racist position. There is no justification save a racist position. Why Al Tereki is the one to fill the vacuum after Konari? I mean Konari was head of state and he became chairman of the commission. After we removed Konari and replace him with another unknown official, no matter how he was, Konari would leave behind a big vacuum in the African Union Commission and this vacuum must be filled.

Tereki is a veteran, a skilled person, experienced, known by all the Africans. He specialises in Africa and is the best person to assume this post. But they say to you he is from North Africa from the Arabic speaking. We are not accustomed for one from this group to head the OAU or the African Union Commission.

This is the secret behind the surprise now. They were shocked when we presented this name. All of them were shocked. They said we are not accustomed to this. They said a black person is supposed to be the chairman of the commission. Obviously there was a racist culture existing from the Arabs against the Africans and from black Africans against Arabs from the days of Houphuet-Boigny and the days of Singaore.

On the other hand the Arabs were biased to their culture against the African culture. Ben Bella managed to take such a stand and directed this orientation in the right direction and Abdul Nasser was convinced by the explanations of Ben Bella and he reorganised his policies in Africa and played a very important role in Africa and in their unity. He helped the peoples and the liberation movement and played a very important role in Africa, their unity and helping the liberation movements. Egypt played a prominent role in the liberation of Africa.

Now Qadhafi came in this space and the phase of the armed liberation in Namibia by SWAPO movement and the armed liberation movement in Zimbabwe by Zanu and Zapu movement and the liberation movement of Angola from Portugese colonisation and the liberation movement of Guinea Bisseau and Cape Verde during the says of Amilcar Caprol and Ninu Vierra. And the South African Liberation Movement by the African National Congress (ANC) that was led by Mandela, the father of Mbeki etc. They were the founding leaders of this movement, ANC. And Frelimo and Remano in Mozembique and Frolina inChad, the Chadian National Liberation Movement. And the Mozembiquean National Liberation Movement.

There was a revolution in Libya which threw its weight behind the liberation movements and you will view the video of the liberation camps where thousands of African men were trained on Libyan soil. Because among other things, Libya was placed by the colonialist countries on the black list and considered a terrorist country which is full of camps of terrorist.

Terrorism for them was the liberation of South Africa and the ANC was at time a terrorist movement and Mandela was a terrorist who was sentenced to 27 years in jail. And the Swapo movement. led by Sam Injuma who was always in Libya was considered a terrorist movement. And the Angola Liberation Movement. They used to say that Angola was Portugese and they considered the movement a terrorist movement. They also considered Frelimo and Freolina and all these movements terrorist movements. They also considered Museveni, Zenawi, Issias Afeworke, Omar Al Bourj, Kokni Wadai and Lumumba : they were all considered terrorists who should be eliminated at that time.

Libya supported this liberation camp and up till now Libya pays the price for training thousands of African fighters and paid millions for the liberation of Africa. Up to now Libya pays the price of its effective participation in the liberation of Africa and this is duty and we have no remorse. This is an honour and a glory and there is also a benefit for Libya when the African continent becomes liberated and becomes one strong nation, like America, Europe and China.

Yet at the same time I caution to another phenomena, a phenomena I call the Serbbian or the Russian phenomena in Africa. You know that Serbia is the biggest state in the Balkans and does not desire the unity of Europe. It wants the unity of the southern Slavs, Yugoslavia. Why? Because if it unites the small Balkan states in a Yugoslav union, Serbia becomes the leader and the dominant one. And these small states become satellite states. I mean satellites that rotate like the planets that rotate around the bigger planet. Bosnia, Croatia, Slovenia, Macedonia, Montenegro, even Kosovo, they all used to rotate around Serbia. Serbia was the base.

And you have seen after the death of Tito rebellions started and they say we were colonised by Serbia. I met journalists from Slovenia and Croatia and they were telling me about Serbian imperialism. The first time I heard the word Serbian imperialism was from journalists from the countries that were part of the Yugoslav Union. They said because Serbia was dominating them and we are proxies to it.

And the era of the masses has ushered in and we will be liberated from the domination of Serbia. If Serbia were part of the European Union, that is a member of it, Croatia and Slovenia etc were members also they would be equals because they are all members of the European Union like Bulgaria, Serbia and Montenegro, like Luxembourg, like Germany, like France. They are all equal members. However Serbia is imposing the unity of Europe and wanted its own regional unity, to become dominant. This is the interpretation and the analysis.

The same applies to the Soviet Union which was based on Russia and the evidence when the era of the masses came the Soviet Union disintegrated and these countries became independent. And now they became independent countries such as Ukrania, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Belorus, Latvia, Estonia, etc All these countries, 15 countries, 15 nations were under the domination of Russia. They are the ones who say this. Therefore Russia used to maintain this gathering around it to be the strongest. It is the center and the others are the peripheries.

This phenomenon is now present in Africa. It is the phenomenon of African Serbia or African Russia. There are countries with weight in Africa opposing Africa unity. Why? Because they want to lead regionally from Africa and to have a sphere of influence and a market for its products and semi colonise and satellite states. Therefore these powers always oppose one way of another the establishment of African unity or the establishment of a federal government. The establishment of an African federal government means all countries, large and small are equal. The united states of Africa will be like the United States of America. All equal states. If there is no African unity and there are only regional unities then the region will be going in the orbit of the larger dominant state in the region. Therefore the major countries in Africa oppose African unity because they want to be alone in dealing with the region and use it as a colony or as a market for its products.

This may change with the change of personalities and culture of the people. The phenomenon is there. This state could be Libya, Algeria or Egypt. It could be Congo or Nigeria, South Africa, Tanzania or Ethiopia. It could be any state. You chose any state with some weight and resources. It could be the Ivory Coast or Senegal i.e. A state with some weight and with other statelets orbiting around it. Those who have such a vision oppose African unity because they want to be in a special region where they dominate. When the statelets in the region awake and know the conspiracy which involves bad will and his harmful they will rise up against the orbit imposed on them.

Gambia for example is in the midst of Senegal. It is a small stretch over the Gambia River. Therefore Gambia is like a worm. It was colonised by the English speaks English and is now independent. But Senegal was colonised by France. In such a situation the large state is Senegal but Gambia and Guinea Bisseau are statelets. Suppose the African Union is established. This means a federal government and that Senegal, Gambia and Guinea Bisseau become equal like Algeria, Ethiopia or South Africa.

If there are United States of Africa all states become equal. Unity means equality and is beneficial for smaller states. Of course those who have this vision will not live long because the region we are talking about will have the same fate as that of the Soviet Union and the gathering of orbiting states will be over. We see the disintegration of federal Yugoslavia and is now attracted by European unity. All member states in federal Yugoslavia will become members in the European Union. They become equal like Slovenia and Serbia.

If there is any state and suppose it is Libya, it will have an orbiting group of states around it. This will not last long because these states want to be liberated from the Libyan grip. They want to become equal like Libya in the African Union and Libya becomes a state like any other state.

I want to alert African states that I may not find enough time to explain all this in the summit which is for one day. The first day is just a celebration and valueless speeches and guests from everywhere deliver speeches at the expense of African time. But in the second day we have the hard work and the people start to leave. I want to alert those with these intentions that they are going towards a dead end because smaller African states know their interests in equality among the bigger and the small countries. And equality is realised in the African Union, in the united states of Africa and not in regional units. The regional units have question marks.

Then we will have foreign trade. There has to be one minister for African foreign trade. Why? Because single African states, any state has no negotiating value with the African Union or with the US, China or Japan. If one minister goes to Japan to buy one hundred cars he wi