Panathinaikos name ex-Chelsea man as new boss

Monday, June 16th, 2008

Dutchman Henk ten Cate, who was Avram Grant’s right-hand man at Chelsea last season, was named as the new coach of Greek side Panathinaikos on Friday.

“Panathinaikos’ organization, history, ambition and attitude match those of the greatest clubs in Europe, so I’m confident that we will achieve our goals. I’m looking forward to coming to Athens and meeting my players.”

Ten Cate, 54, was assistant manager at Chelsea under Grant last season where the Londoners finished runners-up to Manchester United in the Premier League and the Champions League.

Grant has now been replaced by Brazil’s Luiz Felipe Scolari.

During the 2005-2006 season ten Cate was assistant to Frank Rijkaard at Barcelona which won the Champions League title and the La Liga crown.

Ten Cate was a former player in the Dutch league and briefly had a stint with North American Soccer League side Edmonton Drillers in Canada.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Related posts

Chinese Phoenix signing will use brains to beat brawn

Wednesday, April 16th, 2008

Gao arrived in Wellington today and was straight off to Newtown Park to watch his new teammates being put through a pre-season training session.
The attacking midfielder returns to New Zealand after a brief but notable stint with the ill-fated Knights in 2006/2007.
Through an interpreter, Gao said today he was pleased to be back in New Zealand and keen to mould his game to suit the A-League.
He said the style of soccer in the league was significantly different - and a step up - from China, where he played for Super League club Beijing Guoan before a recent stint in Finland%26#39;s premier league.
Gao, 27, was aware of his comparatively slight frame. He admitted he could pump iron all day and never obtain the physical presence of many of the players in the A-League, but would work around any issues that may present on the field.
That would involve using his %26quot;technique and brain%26quot; to their full extent.
He said there were murmurs from coaches and the media in China that he should have been made an international in that country by now, but the fact that had not happened was not of huge concern.
%26quot;I%26#39;m focusing on how to improve the general standard of football in China. That%26#39;s more important than being a member of the national team,%26quot; he said.
Gao also talked up the New Zealand beef and lamb he tried when he lived in Auckland while at the Knights.
He said it was so good it could replace Chinese food and that it made sense to eat it if he was to give himself any chance of bulking up for the season, starting in August.
While difficult to tell whether or not Gao%26#39;s tongue was in his cheek, he indicated his interest in taking some of his skills back to China further down the track went beyond soccer.
%26quot;He said he%26#39;s interested in other business in New Zealand that could be transferred to China, for example, sheep shearing,%26quot; his interpreter said.
%26quot;Very fast,%26quot; Gao said as he mimicked a shearer.
Phoenix coach Ricki Herbert, who coached Gao for five matches at the Knights, said today he was excited to secure him on a one-year contract.
He said he would have liked to have done so earlier if it had been possible.
%26quot;I think his pace is technically very good, he%26#39;s a great crosser of the ball.%26quot;
Herbert said he also had a sought-after ability to cross well from left-field and wasn%26#39;t too concerned about Gao%26#39;s lack of size, saying it shouldn%26#39;t pose too many problems.
%26quot;I don%26#39;t think so. I think you%26#39;ve always got to try and get that balance right.
%26quot;When you look through the league there%26#39;s probably a few like him from that point of view. But I%26#39;m delighted to get him, I think he%26#39;ll add a new dimension to what we had last year.%26quot;
Herbert said the buildup to the A-League was longer this year and a yet to be finalised tour to China in June would do the team plenty of good in terms of preparation.
He said, as with all clubs, the plan early in the year was to aim for the final four play-offs in the A-League.
%26quot;I think everyone has a desire to part of that.%26quot;

Tags: , , , , ,

Related posts

Cuba: Transitions without End

Saturday, March 29th, 2008

by Dr. Frederic Clairmont

(Global Research)

The victory of the

Revolution is a rampart that ensures that never again will Cuba become

the most sordid brothel our planet has ever known linked to a criminal

gambling and drug infested inferno of the colonial occupiers. Comandante Ernesto Che Guevara, 1 May 1959.

Invariably, after every

speaking engagement on Latin America. the question was raised about

Cuba fate after the exit of the Comandante from the political stage.

The question was not malicious although among my listeners there were

those who believed , or prayed for, that the departure of Fidel

Alejandro Castro Rua, born (1926) in the former province of Oriente on

his father farm (Manacas) ,marks the terminal point of the socialist

revolution. Throughout the ages and by the very nature of our existence

it is part of our normal being to ask that basic question: from whence

have we come and whither are we are going? There are many that have

personalized one of the most momentous historical metamorphoses of all

times.

Fidel Castro and the Revolution

that he incubated and flung into battle with such resounding surprises

and successes for more than a half a century cannot be abstracted from

the role of the masses as the energizing dynamic of change.

The personalization of leaders

as the drive wheel of change is erroneous as it assumes that the makers

of history are exclusively the leaders of social and political

movements. Such a muddled perception is the incarnation of the

Fuhrerprinzip of Nazism that sweeps aside the seminal role of ordinary

peoples that battle to defend the Revolution and build on it. It

deliberately eviscerates the world of labour: workers, farmers,

professionals, the men and women that comprise the armed forces. In

short, it ignores the creators of wealth as the engine of change.

History is about numbers and

very big numbers that dramatically erupt onto the political stage at

certain nodal points in response to the contradictions of our time

stemming from irrepressible convulsions . The revolutionary that is

Fidel Castro is thus inseparable from the masses that catapulted him

into the fires of national struggle from the Moncada Barracks to the

liberation of Havana, in much the same way as Gandhi and Mandela in

their freedom struggles; and no less so Lenin and the October

Revolution.

Thomas Carlyle enriched our understanding of this duality when he wrote in his classic depiction of the French Revolution:

Hunger and nakedness and

nightmare oppression lying heavy on twenty-five million: this, not the

wounded vanities or contradicted philosophies of philosophical

advocates, rich shopkeepers, rural nobles, was the prime mover in the

French Revolution; as the like will be in all such revolutions, in all

countries.

The penetrating insight of Marx

with its sublime message of hope and struggle as humanity faces up to

the exigencies of smashing the inherited mould of capitalism, a system

of class power, privilege, profit and exploitation, illumines the

compulsive sweep of revolutionary change.

History does nothing; it

possesses no immense wealth, fights no battles. It is rather man, real

living man who does everything, who grapples with everything and who

fights.

As a teacher and writer (and

Spanish speaker) I tracked the Revolution trajectory spanning more

than half a century. I was never a member of any political body nor was

I ever enamored by the phony cult of objectivity. In those decades, I

talked to its peoples from all walks of life. I met its leadership. I

participated in its seminars and conferences. It was in those years of

agony and ecstasy that I witnessed the unending twists and turns of its

ascendancy. In those years, I also encountered the hate-filled é–™igré–Ÿ,

who had chosen the path of counter-revolution, dishonor and mendacity,

ensconced in Miami and elsewhere.

To grasp the nature of the

transition ?and that is the crucial word of this lecture - that has

reshaped the nation psyche it is well to recall that the Revolution

was generated as a reaction against the exploitation and sheer cruelty

perpetrated by the US occupation and its domesticated political

Quislings that reigned through the instrumentalities of unadulterated

state terrorism since the consummation of the conquest in 1898. Listen

well to the Comandante words framed on the eve of the freedom upsurge

. Its relevance to the new transition is all too obvious.

Some have insisted that the

only way out for Cuba was to guarantee private investments. That , we

are told, would solve the whole problem. But foreign capitalists had

these guarantees in Cuba for fifty years , and similar guarantees in

practically every other country of the American continent. Did these

guarantees solve the pressing problems confronting its peoples? Did

they solve the problem of mass unemployment, education, public health?

Indeed, what did they solve in all these fifty years? Joblessness

straddling more than one third of the labour force, poverty, hunger and

chronic malnutrition?quot;

I recall on one of our walks on

the Malecon with my friend the late Renato Constantino, a celebrated

Philipino resistance fighter, philosopher and writer pointing his hand

to the waters of the bay in the direction of Florida and saying: Over

there, just a couple of kilometers away. I believe it around 90 kms.

There is the super-colonial Goliath , that has flung everything against

this bastion of a socialist David and what we抳e seen is that the power

of the imperio has been clubbed. Why? You know the answer. What

Voltaire said about God applies no less so to Cuba: If Cuba did not

exist we would have had to invent it. What Renato was saying was that

the White Man world of the imperio cannot coexist with Cuba; and hence, in their view, it must be destroyed. It is toxic and contagious.

Its sheer capacity to survive

and strike back owed nothing to a world of miracles and Shamans. What

Bush, his acolytes and predecessors mean by transition is something

quite different from the meaning emblazoned in the theory and praxis of

the Revolution? It reminds me of the words of Ho Chi Minh formulated

after the breakdown of the Fountainbleau negotiations in 1946. Words

have different meaning for different people. If you spit in the face of

the colonialists they will always call it rain.

We cannot speak of the

multi-faceted transitions in Cuba without studying the grim transition

of imperialism. They are inter-related. American capitalism has leapt

into the big transition, that of recession, galloping fast towards the

Big Depression. The credit seizures and foreclosures are gobbling up

jobs and earnings at an alarming tempo. Panic stricken stock markets

are plummeting with many major financial institutions going bust. The

industrial capacity of US capitalism has withered. What remains of its

colossal industrial heritage, a legacy mainly of the decades 1865-1914,

is being swiftly offshored. Detroit, the once proud citadel of

industrial might is now a wasteland. Its financial structures are

wobbly, shackled with uncontrollable debt: household, corporate and

government that continues to burgeon exponentially. Americans and

foreigners have lost confidence in the greenback that is swiftly

ceasing to be a store of value.

Iran’s president Mahmoud

Ahmadinejad hammered the point when he said: the dollar is nothing but

a worthless piece of paper. A contention that few will contest. Its

claim to be the world reserve currency is a fairy tale. Credit flows

are drying up . Banks are dumping their assets into collapsing markets.

Defaults and bankruptcies are soaring. In sum, US financial capitalism

is in the throes of an implosion. Uncle Sam is an enfeebled mendicant

living off borrowed time and borrowed money. But not for long can this

game continue.

The empire has over 700

military overseas bases in over 130 countries but its effective power

is shrinking day by day. This then is the big contrast with Cuba

transition. Its growth in real terms has steadily topped 6%over the

last six years. The brutalizing years of the Special Period have

largely been vanquished. The economic and spiritual revolutions in Cuba

are nothing short of mind-boggling that bear no comparison with any

Latin American countries. Let there be no illusion. Cuba is a Third

World nation. It still is a poor country. The wages of its labour force

are still abysmally low. The exploitation of man by man has vanished.

Of pivotal importance, however, is that it has now achieved full

employment, a reality once regarded as the unattainable Nirvana.

Illiteracy, malnutrition and mendicancy have ceased to exist. Its life

expectancy is almost on a par with Japan and Sweden, as against 56 in

Batista neo-colony. Its infant mortality rate is on a par with Canada

and has already outstripped that of the United States. These are the

transitions that the media masters of the corporate gulag chose to

eliminate from their specious references on transitions.

I well remember the

Revolution formative years when the white-skinned medical personnel

bolted the country boasting that medicine is dead and the only thing

that will take its place is Voodoo. In their imbecilic gasp of triumph

they had forgotten to say that their political cronies had plundered

the nation Treasury and dispatched its pickings to the land of the

ex-colonial master. Cuba now has around 90,000 students spanning the

entire range of medical care. This nation which, according to its

unbending liquidators, has abolished æ…¼uman rights?has set its goal of

becoming the paramount medical science citadel in the world.

There are now over 12,000 students in ELAM: La Escuela Latinoamericana de Medicina,

one of the world top educational establishments. Over the next decade

it will be graduating with Venezuela more than 100,000 Latin American

and Caribbean doctors within the integration framework of ALBA:

Bolivarian Alternative for the Americas. Together with Venezuela,

Operation Miracle was launched designed to restore vision to no fewer

than 6 million in all of Latin America and the Caribbean.

These astounding numbers would

have been inconceivable without a socialist order and the discipline

and sacrifices that moved in tandem with it. Tens of thousands of Cuban

medical and non-medical personnel are working in 27 countries under

difficult physical conditions. In his visit to Cuba in 2007, in which

he decorated the 140 medical personnel, General Pervez Musharaf ( a

fervent ally of the empire) was not indulging in hyperbole when he

noted:

Yours was one of the greatest

acts of solidarity that humanity has ever known. We thank President

Castro and the Cuban people. You came thousands of miles away, in the

depth of one of the most severest winters, to heal and save the lives

of thousands of our people stricken by that appalling natural disaster.

You even brought your own medical equipment and medicines. There is not

a single village in our country that has not heard of your heroic deeds

and sacrifices. These awards are a modest token to express our

gratitude. You gave everything but took nothing in exchange except our

love. The word thanks , you will understand, is too small a tribute to

convey the immensity of our debt and feeling towards you.

The systematic state terrorist

onslaughts against Cuba pre-date 1962 that marked the start of the

official embargo that has endured with no respite for almost half a

century .Attempts to quarantine Cuba have failed. Year after year in

the UN General Assembly just two countries, the United States ( plus

its two Pacific island protectorates) and Israel voted for the

embargo perpetuation. Its cumulative cost according to foreign

minister Roque approaches $100bn. And yet, notwithstanding the

permanent war including several aborted attempts at assassination of

the president, Cuba has lurched forward prodigiously , not only in its

dispensation of education and medical aid to countries on many

continents, but as a fraternal catalyst in the liberation struggle. No

country in the world has given as much to Africa as Cuba has done and

continues to do. A gift sealed with the blood of its peoples.

Nelson Mandela touched on one

of the energizing roles of Cuba when he spelt out in his homage to the

Comandante during his visit to South Africa following the liquidation

of the Apartheid regime.

We and all the peoples of the

Free World are honored to have you here. And by the Free World we refer

to the peoples whose blood has been shed profusely to liquidate

imperialism. Consider South Africa as your land. We shall not forget

the decisive role you played militarily in destroying the South African

army. You came thousands of miles to participate in the freedom

struggle with us. You fought nobly, unstintingly and shed your blood to

ensure our freedom. Without you our freedom would not have been

consummated.

Obviously such views were in

contrast to the architects of Cuba annihilation. These avalanches of

death-dealing hatred had nothing to do with the familiar claptrap that

the island of socialism had repudiated all the vestiges of human rights

and democracy. The heights of vulgarity scaled by the practitioners of

exterminism were exhibited by General Alexander Haig, one of

President Reagan henchmen, when he fulminated in a meeting of the

National Security Council : You just give me the word and I抣l turn

that fucking little island into a parking lot. If this is not an

exhortation to the Holocaust then words have no meaning. The mass

exterminism propounded by Haig was not galvanized because of the

apprehensions of the upshot of another Bay of Pigs.

It was because even at that

time Cuba had made yet another dramatic transition: it had become

militarily invulnerable. This was matched by the decline of the imperio

and its military over-reach that exposed its soft underbelly. To this

was added an event of the greatest importance , the alliance with

Venezuela concretized in the words of Chavez:

An attack against Cuba will be

countered by an immediate cut-off of oil. More important is that it

will lead to a flow of blood including the blood of Bolivarian patriots

since revolutionary Cuba and Venezuela are blended in the war against

imperialism. It will be an horrendous war if the imbeciles that rule

the imperio are so dumb as to unleash it. And I need hardly say that it

will be a devastating counterpunch that overspills the confines of

Cuba. For the first time in the history of the Americas a black man

was calling the shots.

In yet another of his

preachments on Cuba transition, Bush excoriated Barack Obama for

declaring that if he elected he would talk to everyone. In a regime

in which the very mention of dialogue is anathema Bush flatly

pontificated that there can be no dialogue with the Castro tyrant that

has brought nothing but disaster and poverty to his people and

eliminating all traces of human dignity and freedom. This is quite a

mouthful from a man that continues to prattle endlessly about human

dignity when in his own backyard the American prison population stands

at 2.3 million with no signs of tapering off. According to the Pew

Report it now has 750 prisoners per 100,000 as against 79 per 100,000

in Switzerland. One in 15 African Americans are behind bars, as against

I in 75 for Hispanics and 1 in 106 for whites.

Is Bush oblivious to the crimes

against humanity in the war that he has waged against Iraq in which

more than one million Iraqis have been killed and wounded? In addition,

their factories, farms, homes and infrastructure have been smashed. The

cost of that war has moved from billions to trillions of dollars seen

from the American side of the balance sheet. The numbers are misleading

in that they do not include the costs to the people of Iraq. Indeed,

the policies of US exterminism was neatly encapsulated in the pithy

comment of the British dramatist and Nobel Prize winner Harold Pinter

You either do as I say or I抣l kick your ass in. Because of its

refusal to have its ass kicked in Cuba has been condemned to the

chopping block. To be sure there are no presidents since 1945 that are

not indictable on war crimes charges.

Bush launched one more of his

transitions when his administration created a Cuba Transition

Coordinator bossed by Cleb McCarry, former ambassador to Afghanistan.

On 10 July 2006, a report of the Commission for Assistance to a Free

Cuba demanded immediate action to ensure the failure of the Castro

regime succession strategy.

There was nothing new in this

verbose report. It was framed as an ultimatum that bluntly stated that

the land and industrial and financial sectors must be denationalized.

The Roman Church and its prerogatives must be fully restored including

its extensive land holdings and the end of the separation of Church and

State.. It was a blueprint for the return of the neo-colonial

occupation from 1898-1959. Noteworthy is that its goals could be

succinctly summarized in an utterance made more than 50 years ago by an

American oilman at the peak of the oil bonanza in Venezuela.

Here in Venezuela you have the

right to do what you like with your capital. This right is dearer to me

than all the political rights in the world.

The Economist, that

militant mouthpiece of Big Capital (it owned by the Pearson Trust)

hollers for US intervention to halt the nationalist and socialist

offensives gathering speed in Cuba, Venezuela, Bolivia and Nicaragua.

To put it bluntly , Latin America needs more Lula da Silvas [and his

version of neo-liberalism] and fewer Chavez and Morales. This is

where the United States could help. The imperial masters , however,do

not require such morsels of advice because it is central to the applied

logic of state terrorism.

As we have seen, institutional

changes have been a permanent trait of the Revolution and the current

debates and their implementation do not mark a qualitative change in

their direction. It is but yet another phase of the greatest importance

given the immense strides and complexity of the national economy. Cuba

today is a power house of modern science and technology embracing

bio-technology, electronics, engineering, information technology, the

chemical and petrochemical industries, mining, the iron and steel

industry, etc. To that inventory we should simply say that Cuba stands

at the summit of world educational attainment.

The debate on the new

transition In Cuba has reached a frenzied pace and straddles the

problem of optimizing capital and labour resources. No holes are barred

in these debates on the extent of administrative incompetence and

corruption, and the theft of national assets. The current projects call

for a massive overhaul of the bureaucracy whose swollen numbers are a

deterrent to the nation productive advance.

These changes now underway

demand a decentralization of economic decision making slated to boost

productivity. The changes will require an overhaul of wholesale and

retail price structures, wage payments and incentive payments,

subsidies and the prevailing rationing system The latter was never

designed to be a permanent fixture of a socialist order. These changes

call for, as President Raul Castro stated in his 26 July 2007 policy

statement, for the elimination of a host of prohibitions and red tape.

Illustrative is the case of the dairy industry and specifically milk

distribution. There are no overall directives engulfing the entire

economy. Experimentation is proceeding on a piecemeal basis in various

municipalities and then gradually extended. In the case of milk

distribution this has resulted in savings of over $40 million and in

addition huge savings in fuel costs.

This is how Fidel puts it in his Reflections

of 16 January. We do not intend to give anything to those who could be

producing but do not produce, or who produce very little. We shall

reward the merits of those who work with their hands and their minds.

The question is obviously open: to what extent will these transitions,

that cut deeply into the flesh of Cuba socialism, engender enhanced

inequalities in a society whose egalitarianism is legendary.? Our query

will soon be answered by unfolding events.

There are well-intentioned

critics who propagate that Cuba should embrace the free market magic

and its propertied social relations from whence it follows that the

Chinese model is appropriate. One recalls Deng Xiaoping epic

outburst. To be rich is glorious Deng ideas and their

reverberations have been discussed in depth for several years in Cuba.

But let us be realistic. What is Deng rallying cry other than a

resounding clamour for the restoration of capitalism? A visit to

China cities and countryside and the monstrous inequalities between

them and within them is amply confirmatory of the workings of the

system. Its millionaires have become billionaires. China and Cuba

belong to two opposed universes. China level of inequality, measured

by the Gini coefficient, is similar to that of American capitalism.

The capitalist reality of the

islands of Hong Kong and Macao owned and dominated politically by a

cabal of at most a dozen mega capitalist families that are entrenched

through marriage, extended family connections and their daily economic

wheelings and dealings would suggest that the Cuban leadership and its

people will not be following this road. Thus the relevance of the

Chinese capitalist model to Cuba smacks of total irrealism.

Our lectures on transitions

both within imperialism and Cuba are taking place not in an abstract

world but in a world where capitalism - and American capitalism in

particular ?is traversing one of the most cataclysmic

upheavals since the Great Depression of the l930s. The resultant of

this tragedy is beyond the scope of these lectures.

But what I believe will be the

most important conditioner of the future direction of socialism in Cuba

are the ethical foundations on which it reposes. This is enshrined in

what I conceive to be one of the most penetrating manifestos in Cuban

history. It is the definition of the Revolution so masterly articulated

on 1 May 2000 by the Comandante that merits quotation at length.

The

Revolution is the sense of the historic moment; it is to change all

that must changed; it is equality and freedom in their plenitude; it

means that we must be treated, and to treat others, as human beings; it

is to emancipate ourselves by our own powers; it is to challenge the

powerful dominant forces within the nation and abroad; it is to defend

our values at whatever price and sacrifice; it is modesty,

disinterestedness , altruism, solidarity and heroism; it means not

having recourse to lies or thrashing ethical principles; it is the deep

conviction that there is no force in the world capable of crushing the

power of truth and ideas. Revolution is unity; it is independence; it

is to fight for the materialization of our dreams for Cuba and the

world; it is the foundation of our patriotism, our socialism and our

internationalism.Frederic

F. Clairmont is a prominent Canadian academic whofor many years was a

permanent senior economics affairs officer at the United Nations

Economics Commission for Africa and the United Nations Conference for

Trade and Development (UNCTAD). He taught at the University of

Kings College and Dalhousie University in Nova Scotia. His classic work

is The Rise and Fall of Economic Liberalism and his latest book is:

Cuba and Venezuela: The Nemeses of Imperialism published by Citizens

International in Penang, Malaysia. He is a a frequent contributor to

Le Monde Diplomatique and The Economic and Political Weekly.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Related posts

Bush, Colombia and Narco-Politics

Thursday, March 13th, 2008

by André–Ÿ Cala

(Consortium News)[Editor's Note: On March 1,

Colombian armed forces crossed into Ecuador to kill 24 leftist

Colombian guerrillas, including a senior commander, Raul Reyes. The

attack touched off a confrontation pitting Colombia against Ecuador and

Venezuela, which condemned the violation of Ecuador's sovereignty and

noted that Reyes was a key figure in negotiations over prisoner

releases and a possible reduction in political tensions.

The

Bush administration defended Colombia's right to attack terrorists

even if that requires crossing a border, a position echoed by this

year's presidential candidates, including Hillary Clinton and Barack

Obama. Indeed, from the opinion circles of Washington, there was almost

no criticism of Colombian President Alvaro Uribe although his inner

circle has long been linked to both right-wing terrorism and cocaine

trafficking.

Last

August, journalist Andres Cala examined the new evidence about Uribe's

ties to this dark underworld of Latin American violence. We are

republishing that special report below:]

George

W. Bush strategy of countering Venezuela leftist president Hugo

Ch醰ez by strengthening ties to Colombia rightist government has been

undercut by fresh evidence of high-level drug corruption and human

rights violations implicating President Alvaro Uribe inner circle. These new allegations about Colombia

narco-politics have tarnished Uribe reputation just as Bush has been

showcasing the Harvard- and Oxford-educated politician as a paragon of

democratic values and an alternative to the firebrand Ch醰ez, who has

used Venezuela oil wealth to finance social programs for the poor

across the region.

Despite the corruption disclosures ?and Uribe failure to stem

Colombian cocaine smuggling to the United States ?the Bush

administration continues to shower Uribe government with trade

incentives and billions of dollars in military and development aid.

With other regional leaders unwilling to side with the United States

against Ch醰ez, Bush may see little alternative but to stay the course

with the 55-year-old Uribe and hope Colombia corruption doesn draw

too much attention in the United States or across South America.

Ironically, the latest evidence against Uribe government emerged from

a U.S.-backed peace process that offered leniency to right-wing

paramilitary death squads and their financial backers in exchange for

giving up their guns and disclosing past crimes.

The right-wing paramilitaries and their cocaine-trafficking benefactors

testified that elements of the Colombian government collaborated in a

decade-long scorched-earth campaign that killed almost 10,000 civilians

while seeking to dislodge a leftist guerrilla army known as the

Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia, or FARC.

The confessions include blood-soaked tales of political murders,

cocaine smuggling and staggering government corruption. As a result,

dozens of former and current congressmen, governors, government

ministers, military officers, prominent business leaders and

multinational corporations are being investigated or have been arrested.

This so-called ara-scandal?revealed that a counterinsurgency force,

known as the United Self-Defence Forces of Colombia, or AUC,

collaborated with drug lords to control the cocaine trade and

simultaneously worked with Colombia elites, including Uribe family,

to fend off the guerrilla threat.

Another troubling offshoot of the peace process was the creation of a

safe haven for drug lords, who flocked to a 370-square-kilometer

sanctuary set up for the AUC.

Colombian mafia boss Fabio Enrique Ochoa Vasco, 47, who was indicted in

Florida in September 2004 for drug trafficking and money laundering,

claimed he was one of 10 U.S.-wanted traffickers who found protection

in the Santa Fe Ralito sanctuary.

AUC leaders romised to include their financial backers in the

negotiation?as a way to shield alleged cocaine traffickers from

extradition to the United States, Ochoa Vasco told a Colombian magazine

in June.

It was all

prearranged in 2001, according to paramilitary and drug lord accounts.

If Uribe won the presidency, paramilitary leaders would be offered

generous sentence reductions and be allowed to serve their time outside

prison walls if they demobilized and confessed.

Ochoa Vasco, who allegedly ships eight tons of cocaine monthly to the

United States, was told that he and other AUC allies would be sentenced

in Colombia to a maximum of 12 years, rather than face possible life

sentences in U.S. prisons.

Uribe History

The new disclosures also have brought back to public attention the

Uribe family long history of ties to drug lords and paramilitary

militias. Colombia Supreme Court announced in July that it was

investigating Senator Mario Uribe, the president cousin and his point

man in the Colombian Congress, for alleged links to the AUC.

Several paramilitary leaders have said Mario Uribe was one of their

allies and an intermediary with the government. He has denied any

wrongdoing.

But the family

link to purported drug lords dates back several decades. As a young man

and an aspiring politician, ç¾–varo Uribe lost his position as mayor of

Medell韓 ?after only five months on the job ?because the country

president ousted him over his family suspected connections to

traffickers, according to media reports at the time.

His father Alberto Uribe, a wealthy landowner, reputedly had been a

close associate of the Medell韓 cartel and its kingpins, such as Pablo

Escobar and the Ochoa brothers, who were personal friends.

In 1983, Alberto Uribe was reportedly wanted by the U.S. government for

drug trafficking when he was killed in a kidnapping attempt by the

FARC. According to media accounts, his body was airlifted back to his

family by one of Escobar helicopters.

In the early 1990s, ç¾–varo Uribe brother, Santiago, was investigated

for allegedly organizing and leading a paramilitary militia that was

headquartered at the Uribe family hacienda. He was never charged and

the case was dismissed for lack of evidence. But Santiago was

photographed alongside Fabio Ochoa at a party even after the government

had declared Ochoa one of the most notorious Medell韓 cartel kingpins.

The incident with Santiago Uribe coincided with ç¾–varo Uribe eight

years in the Senate, where he opposed extradition of drug suspects. His

critics accused him of working for the Medell韓 cartel.

But the relationship between right-wing narco-financed paramilitaries

and the Colombian government has been a long and complex one, with

shifting alliances based on the self-interest of the moment.

In 1992, the Drug Enforcement Administration, the CIA and the U.S.

military, along with Colombian intelligence services, joined forces

with the Cali cartel to train, equip and coordinate an undercover group

of mercenaries known as the Pepes, an acronym for Persecuted by Pablo

Escobar. Among its leaders was Carlos Casta駉, who would later run the

AUC.

Systematically, the

Pepes assassinated Escobar top henchmen and their families, finally

killing Escobar himself in 1993. The Pepes then split up. Some went on

to create their own drug empires, while Casta駉 built a paramilitary

army financed by rich landowners and drug dealers.

Since the war on Escobar organization, Casta駉 and the Cali cartel ?
as well as Colombian military officers ?have claimed that they work

side by side with U.S. agencies, but U.S. authorities have denied such

an alliance.

The alienation

from Washington widened in 1994 when President Ernesto Samper came to

power amid disclosures that his campaign had received generous

donations from drug cartels. President Bill Clinton cut most aid and

severed some military support to Colombia because of Samper ties to

drug traffickers.

With less

U.S. aid, the Colombian army was unable to contain the FARC and coca

acreage soared. Colombia rulers responded with the creation of

paramilitary militias that used terror to reduce popular support for

the guerrillas.

The Samper

government pushed what was known as the Convivir project. It armed,

trained and organized local defence cooperatives to provide pecial

private security and vigilance services?alongside the armed forces,

creating another cover for right-wing paramilitary forces.

Rise of Uribe

Alvaro Uribe political rise was tied to the success of Convivir. In

1995, Uribe became the governor of Antioquia, a north-western district

with Medell韓 as the capital.

Uribe was the country most vocal supporter of the defence

cooperatives, authorizing dozens of them with almost 20 of these

Uribe-backed cooperatives run by paramilitary leaders, including the

AUC current top commander, Salvatore Mancuso. [Casta駉, who operated

in a different state, wasn one of them.]

Casta駉 is quoted in a biography as saying Uribe was the presidential candidate of the AUC social support base.

揇eep

down, he the closest man to our philosophy,?Casta駉 said, adding

that Uribe support for the Convivir was grounded on the same

principle that gave rise to paramilitarism in Colombia, the right to

self-defence against guerrillas.

When confronted with accusations of complicity between Convivir and

drug-connected paramilitaries, Uribe said that at the time nobody knew

who the right-wing leaders and the cocaine traffickers were.

After an international outcry, however, the government slowly phased

out Convivir. By the time it was outlawed in 1998, however, over 200

defence cooperatives, counting thousands of men, defied the order to

demobilize and joined Casta駉 new paramilitary alliance, the AUC.

The Convivir project had other long-term consequences. Beyond

establishing and arming paramilitary militias, the project created a

web of cooperation between Colombia military and right-wing death

squads. Some paramilitary leaders, such as Casta駉, claimed the CIA and

DEA also gave the AUC discreet support.

At least two top paramilitary commanders have claimed that the

Colombian military coordinated counterinsurgency operations with the

AUC.

揑 am living proof of state-sponsored paramilitarism in Colombia,?said the AUC Mancuso in his deposition earlier this year.

The AUC leaders have named several high-ranking Colombian officers as

collaborating with the paramilitaries, including former General Rito

Alejo del Rio, Antioquia commanding officer during Uribe

governorship.

While running

for the presidency in 2002, Uribe cited the perceived success of the

Convivir program in damaging the FARC infrastructure in Antioquia as

a key reason why Colombians should vote for him.

Despite the drug suspicions ?and the links to paramilitary death

squads ?Uribe benefited from public disenchantment with a sputtering

peace process that had failed to end the civil war. Uribe emerged as

the winner with 53 percent of the vote.

After Uribe election, several drug barons claimed they had financed

his campaign. Indicted drug trafficker Ochoa Vasco said he contributed

$150,000 of his own money at the AUC request.

Ochoa Vasco also said he witnessed a conversation between the AUC

leaders and supposed representatives of Uribe campaign before the

election.

hey talked about

the peace process,?Ochoa Vasco said. hey said anyone with problems

with the U.S. could get involved. And in another meeting, there were

businessmen, landowners and drug traffickers who [the AUC] thought they

could also include, so they told them to get ready for the peace

process.?/p>

All the

paramilitary leaders who negotiated the peace agreement 搆now the

truth. They know that to be there, they invested more than 10 million

dollars,?Ochoa Vasco said.

Government negotiations with the AUC began four months after Uribe took

office. Casta駉 repositioned himself as an opponent of the drug

corruption that, by then, clearly pervaded the AUC. He resigned as AUC

military leader.

In April

2004, Casta駉 was ambushed by 20 elite paramilitaries following orders

from the AUC top leaders. He was shot almost two dozen times in the

face, chopped into pieces, and burned.

Surviving AUC leaders and drug traffickers said Casta駉 was killed

because he was negotiating his surrender to the DEA along with all

trafficking information about the AUC and its government and military

allies. U.S. authorities have denied any negotiation.

Uribe-Bush Alliance

Meanwhile, Uribe lined up solidly behind President George W. Bush by

becoming the only South American leader to endorse Bush invasion of

Iraq. Uribe also sought more U.S. military aid as he defined the civil

war against the leftist FARC as part of the 揼lobal war on terror.?

The backbone of U.S. policy in Colombia is Plan Colombia, a mostly

military aid program to fight both drug production and irregular

armies, most notably the FARC and the AUC. Since 2001, Washington has

sent over $5 billion to Bogot?

Nonetheless, Plan Colombia put little dent in cocaine production. The

coca acreage in 2006 was slightly more than in 2001, when Plan Colombia

was implemented. Acreage was reduced in 2003 and 2004 but shot up again

in 2005 and 2006.

But

Uribe success in curbing political violence boosted his popularity in

Colombia. He vigorously pressed the war against the FARC, forcing the

leftist guerrillas into a tactical retreat. Overall, Uribe reduced the

number of murders, kidnappings and massacres by about one-third.

The Uribe-controlled Congress also passed the Justice and Peace Law,

which launched a peace process with the right-wing paramilitaries that

demobilized 30,000 men and women. The law was written by Sen. Mario

Uribe, the cousin now being investigated for his AUC ties. Even the

Bush administration criticized the law terms as overly lenient.

With Uribe popularity soaring, he got his congressional allies to

change the Constitution to permit a second presidential term. Uribe

then swept to reelection in 2006, winning 62 percent of the vote.

Still, accusations of corruption and unpunished human rights violations dogged him.

Several investigations, especially those led by Colombia Supreme

Court, slowly amassed evidence against former and current government

officials and prominent figures among the country elite.

Those implicated included dozens of current and former members of the

Congress; high-ranking military officers, including the current chief

of staff; entire army battalions allegedly working for drug cartels;

prominent businessmen; and some of Uribe closest allies, including

the father and brother of Colombia former foreign minister Mar韆

Consuelo Ara鷍o.

In March

2006, a laptop belonging to a top paramilitary leader was seized in a

raid. The computer was found to contain detailed information on

drug-trafficking operations, killings committed during the peace

process, potential hit lists of other victims, the AUC plan for

influencing the government, and a list of contributors and political

allies.

One of the hit

lists was linked to Colombia intelligence service and to its

director, Jorge Noguera, a close Uribe ally who the president named

consul in Milan after the initial investigation was opened.

Noguera was later arrested for his ties to the AUC and drug

traffickers, for filtering information to the AUC, for erasing

incriminating evidence of several drug traffickers and paramilitary

leaders, for complicity in the assassinations of several union leaders,

and for obstructing operations to capture his allies.

Other Colombian intelligence officials also were arrested, including

one high-level official, Rafael Garc韆, who testified that he erased

evidence at the request of Noguera. Garc韆 also accused Noguera of

plotting to assassinate Venezuela president Ch醰ez in coordination

with high-level officials in Uribe administration, though Garc韆

didn give their names.

Paramilitary leader Mancuso also accused Uribe Defence Minister Juan

Manuel Santos in his deposition of plotting with the AUC to kill

Venezuela Ch醰ez, although it not clear whether Santos was one of

the men whom intelligence officer Garc韆 was referring to. Santos

denied the accusation.

Then,

in December 2006, embarrassed by the ongoing criminality in the AUC

Santa Fe Ralito safe haven, the government put some paramilitary

leaders in prison. But even there, they continued to live the high life

and kept on top of their criminal operations.

The local press published in May transcripts of police wiretaps

revealing AUC leaders continuing to order killings and to direct drug

trafficking from prison, while also enjoying dance parties, sexual

orgies and alcohol. They hosted 揗exican friends?and had unrestricted

access to cell phones and the Internet.

In one conversation, the frustrated former prison warden complained to

a colleague that her orders were constantly overruled by her superiors

when paramilitary leaders called to complain to the peace commissioner,

government ministers and even the president. The warden soon requested

to be relocated.

Infuriated by the wiretap disclosures, Uribe ordered the firing of the

top 12 generals in the police, but he said little about the evidence of

AUC criminality beyond promising another investigation.

AUC leaders also threatened to break off the peace process, accusing

the government of changing the terms. They felt betrayed, they said,

and threatened to incriminate all their elite allies, including

politicians, businessmen, and multinationals.

Regional Trouble

The Organization of American States, which has overseen the peace

process with the AUC, has been critical of the results. The OAS warned

that the paramilitaries are rearming and reorganizing under different

names, with stronger ties to drug traffickers, and are being led by

some of the same leaders who supposedly had surrendered.

OAS Assistant Secretary General Albert Ramdin said this year that the

AUC demobilization process might well fail to solve Colombia problem

with drug-financed paramilitary groups.

Colombia approach 揷ould trigger a truth and justice process that

would put an end to paramilitary groups in the regions, and lead to

reconstruction of the State,?Ramdin said. 揙r, on the other hand, it

could accentuate the influence of paramilitary groups linked to drug

trafficking.?

Despite

Colombia problems ?the corruption, the shaky peace process and the

shortcomings of its anti-drug program ?Bush has continued to show

unstinting support for Uribe. Calling Uribe a true democrat and a

strong leader, Bush has visited Colombia twice, including earlier this

year, and met with Uribe several times in Washington.

揑抦

proud to call [Uribe] a friend and strategic ally,?Bush said during

one of Uribe visits. In Bogot? the U.S. president said: 揑

appreciate the [Colombian] president determination to bring human

rights violators to justice. ?I believe that, given a fair chance,

President Uribe can make the case.?

Bush asked the U.S. Congress to increase financial support for Plan

Colombia, but Democrats cut military aid from 80 percent to 65 percent

of the total allocation, while increasing economic and humanitarian

aid. Moreover, the Democrats attached strict conditions on the total

$530 million.

Democrats

also have conditioned their ratification of a free-trade agreement with

Colombia on Uribe improving the country human rights record and

prosecuting paramilitary leaders.

In South America, Uribe has slowly backed himself into a corner by

siding with Bush. While most South American countries have grown more

critical of U.S. foreign policy and its Free Trade Agreement of the

Americas, Colombia has staunchly supported Bush policies, distancing

itself from its neighbors.

Brazil and Ecuador have closer relations with Venezuela, as do most

countries in the region, in stark contrast to a decade ago. Colombia

has been kept out of South America Mercosur regional trade union,

while Venezuela is expected to join sometime this year.

Uribe also has lost some regional backing in his fight against the

FARC. Ecuador has resisted labelling the FARC a terrorist organization,

but did criticize Plan Colombia and sought reparations for collateral

damage inflicted by Colombian forces on Ecuador border population.

Meanwhile, the drug and corruption scandal keeps growing. Though Uribe

has denied most of the accusations, drug lord Ochoa Vasco has said he

is willing to negotiate his surrender to the DEA along with proof to

support his charges.

Ochoa

Vasco said some AUC leaders and drug traffickers now are willing to

negotiate their surrender to U.S. law-enforcement agencies to avoid

being murdered in Colombia, as powerful forces seek desperately to

silence them and end the ara-scandal.?/p>

In July, Henao G髆ez Bustamante ?the biggest reputed drug lord since

Pablo Escobar ?was extradited to face trafficking charges in the U.S.

He is believed to have been a key player in right-wing politics and one

of the main financers of the AUC.

The target of at least half a dozen assassination attempts while he was

in prison, G髆ez Bustamante told a magazine that he preferred being

extradited to being murdered. He also said he will disclose all the

information about drug corruption in Colombia, AUC infiltration, and

Mexican cartels, in exchange for a more lenient sentence.

Whatever is ultimately proven, however, the spilling out of evidence

linking Uribe to Colombia vast cocaine industry and to the country

history of political murders is bad news for President Bush as he

counts on Uribe to serve as the model for South America future and as

a bulwark against Hugo Ch醰ez.

–Madrid-based

André–Ÿ Cala has written about Colombia civil conflict since 1998. An

award-winning journalist, he worked in six countries for several

outlets, including the Wall Street Journal, Dow Jones Newswires, and

the Associated Press. Cala’s e-mail is:

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Related posts

Courageous Cody and the pain of life

Monday, March 10th, 2008

The chances of 16-year-old Cody Walsh eating normally again are slim.
His chances of becoming a chef are less, and the chances of reaching his 21st birthday aren%26#39;t that much better.
Cody and his family have pinned their hopes on a dangerous bowel and liver transplant, after which he has a greater than 50 percent chance of surviving fewer than five years.
It is also an expensive operation that would require Cody and his mother to spend up to a year in Toronto, Canada, at a cost close to $1 million.
It is money they don%26#39;t have.
In the meantime, he relies for most of his sustenance on a feeding system known as TPN, or total parenteral nutrition, where a glucose solution is fed directly into a major artery, bypassing the need for the lower and upper intestine. If it doesn%26#39;t sound like much of a life, it looks even worse when the risks it carries are considered.
Sitting in his family%26#39;s small house near the Centre of New Zealand, Cody is pragmatic, almost buoyant, about the situation he has found himself in. He is an affable young man who enjoys playing guitar and computer games and regularly gets up to eight friends visiting at home each day.
He says he goes through %26quot;ups and downs%26quot; in itself a euphemism from a teenager who has faced death numerous times in the past six months.
%26quot;There%26#39;s no point moaning about it, you know. That isn%26#39;t going to help.%26quot;
A lifetime of agonising, recurring stomach pains led to the day in September last year when Cody was rushed into an emergency operation after suffering what is known as mid-gut strangulation.
The complications came from a birth abnormality called malrotation volvulus, where the bowel sits incorrectly in the body. In September, the two parts of the bowel started twisting around each other, causing the perilous %26quot;strangulation%26quot;.
This pain was far worse than any he had felt before, prompting him to describe it shortly afterwards as %26quot;like a thousand knife stabs%26quot;.
The frightening fact is that if he had not had the operation to remove most of both intestines, he would have died within the hour.
Multiple operations and complications since have seen him spend at least 1400 hours, or the equivalent of two solid months, in hospitals since then.
One of those stints involved an operation that was very new with uncertain success rates, where the tiny remaining parts of his upper and lower intestines were joined.
It meant the upper intestine had to teach itself to work with the lower intestine and absorb food.
So far, it appears to be working to an extent.
Since January, Cody has been able to eat a handful of food each day, as well as drink small amounts of liquids.
Admittedly, most of it is later vomited up. Even so, just being able to eat after four months of being fed only by tube is a big step forward especially given that the glucose solution puts additional stress on his liver.
The first solid food after all those months was toast.
%26quot;It was good,%26quot; says Cody, who now eats a wide variety, steering away from chocolate and high-fat foods which can put further stress on the liver.
But in many ways, he is faced with a lose-lose situation.
Cody still has to get the lion%26#39;s share of his nutrients directly from the glucose solution, which means being stuck at home and plugged into a machine, while his liver suffers damage.
The transplant would seem like the logical solution but it is not clear-cut, either.
The huge cost is one thing, but then there is the greater than 50 percent chance that the operation will lead to his death within five years.
The only option is to remain on the glucose solution until bowel transplant survival rates increase.
This involves a steadily rising risk of liver failure, blood clots and metabolic problems, not to mention potentially deadly line infections caused by the glucose feeding system. Cody has already had three line infections.
At one point in January, an infection pushed his temperature so high that brain damage was a threat.
Cody points out he is down to the last three of five usable major arteries for the TPN treatment, after line infections took out the viability of two.
He needs two of those in use for when he has the operation, meaning one more line infection that takes out an artery could bring the need for the transplant drastically forward.
His surgeon at Nelson Hospital, Alf Deacon, who diagnosed his condition and has been in charge of Cody%26#39;s case, is the first to admit that he is treading new ground with this case - the first malrotation volvulus case he has seen in a fully grown person.
%26quot;Cody%26#39;s condition has been a steep learning curve for myself, the dietitian, the nurses, emergency department staff and the social worker involved in his care.
%26quot;It is an absolute team effort to keep him alive and well,%26quot; Deacon says.
The condition is more common in babies and, at that stage, also relatively easily fixed.
But in adults, which for most medical reasons Cody is considered, the case is rare.
Current statistics for the liver and small bowel transplant show that, if Cody raised the money and got the Toronto operation now, there would be a 70 percent chance of him surviving two years, and a 40 percent chance of surviving five.
It is still a new operation, full of difficulties, and for a doctor looking at the numbers, keeping Cody on his present treatment is far preferable - even if the quality of life is far less than a 16-year-old should have to endure. Deacon says that is the pay-off Cody has to make for simply going on living.
In contrast, the chances of him surviving on the TPN regime are significantly better within two years, there is a 90 percent chance he will be alive, in five years 75 percent.
But there will still likely to be a day when Cody will have to sit down with doctors and decide whether the risks of complications with TPN outweigh the risks of transplantation.
Deacon, and Cody, hope that day comes later rather than sooner.
In the meantime, Deacon is in regular contact with the Toronto transplant team, giving them regular updates on Cody%26#39;s progress and liver function.
%26quot;According to their transplant surgeon, we have done everything right so far.%26quot;
Because no one in New Zealand is a specialist on the condition, a major source of information for doctors and Cody%26#39;s family comes from a website dedicated to bowel transplantation.
It is here the frightening facts are lined up.
The operation was first tried in the 1960s, but all who had it died until the first successful procedures in the mid-1980s.
In the more than 20 years since the first successful bowel transplants, only about 100 patients have been able to fully stop TPN feeding, resume a normal diet and enjoy a healthy lifestyle.
Almost from day one, Cody and his family have had a staunch advocate in family friend Nyle Sunderland.
It was Sunderland who, while Cody was recovering from the initial operation in Christchurch Hospital, kicked the fundraising drive into action, contacting media outlets about Cody%26#39;s dilemma.
At the time, it was thought that money, not danger, was the only thing that was standing in the way of the operation and following articles in the Nelson Mail, New Idea and a blog about the cause, donations flowed in.
They also flowed back out, as donation tins for the transplant were stolen from cafes at bars around Nelson. The culprit, Jason Peter Rochford, 22, was later caught, sentenced to nine months in jail and labelled as %26quot;pond scum%26quot; by the sentencing judge. He was also ordered to pay $650 reparation to the Cody Walsh Treatment Fund, but Sunderland says she has not seen a cent of the money and doubts it will ever arrive.
So far, about $11,000 has been raised and Sunderland says that recently hearing that the transplant will be delayed by years has been a good thing.
It, of course, gives them more time to raise funds, but also means that finances are not standing in the way of an immediate cure.
But like Cody, his family and doctors, Sunderland is realistic about the situation and the many perils line infections, liver failure, a dwindling number of viable arteries, as well as the eventual risk of a transplant. As she puts it, Cody Walsh and his many supporters are effectively %26quot;playing Russian roulette with everything%26quot;.

Tags: , , , , , ,

Related posts

Colombia’s Cornered President

Thursday, March 6th, 2008

by Forrest Hylton(Counter Punch)Sadly, the operation on March 1 in which the Colombian Armed Forces shot and killed Luis Edgar Devia Silva, a.k.a. Ra鷏 Reyes, spokesman for the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC), along with sixteen other guerrillas in a camp across the Putumayo River in Ecuador, was yet another case of the oft-mentioned death foretold that characterizes the country’s seemingly endless civil war.Eerily, in a March 1 column, one of Colombia’s most prescient political analysts, Alfredo Molano, predicted that a giant storm cloud was about to sweep across some portion of Colombia’s borderlands. Molano described how President ç¾–varo Uribe had brought the war with the FARC to the Darien Gap joining Panama, the Catatumbo region of Northern Santander shared with Venezuela, and the frontiers of Pasto and Putumayo bordering Ecuador. In Molano’s view, the fact that Uribe had been politically cornered at home and abroad made a widening war across national borders all but inevitable. As Justin Podur noted, domestic and foreign pressure for a negotiated peace-that is, a political solution to the armed conflict-has led to an escalation of the war by the stronger, more violent party, along Israeli lines.Since the end of 2006, Uribe has been beset by the parapol韙ica scandal, in which some 77 political figures, including 14 congresspersons, nearly all of them staunch allies of the president, are under investigation for ties to rightwing paramilitaries. The scandal reveals how the president and the Casa de Nari駉 (presidential palace) in Bogot?are tied to the country’s regions, where power and authority are delegated, hence most directly exercised. Indeed, most of the para-politicos investigated are local office holders-governors, mayors, legislators, etc. The bedrock of the paramilitary-politico alliance was sealed in 2001 with the Pacto de Ralito in C髍doba province. The pact led to the first and second election of Uribe with solid-indeed fervent-paramilitary support in congress and the regional state bureaucracies.Parapol韙ica and the PresidentPoliticians under investigation include Uribe’s closest political ally and second cousin, Senator Mario Uribe, who fell under suspicion after former paramilitary chieftain Salvatore Mancuso testified to meetings he had with the president’s cousin to map electoral strategy in Antioquia and C髍doba provinces. As Molano notes, what everyone knows and has long talked about in those provinces-relations between the Uribe family, land deals and landholding, rightwing politics, and paramilitarism-is but a step away from becoming a matter of public record. As early as 1987 and as recently as 2002, distinguished investigative journalists began looking into (and in some cases uncovering) these connections. Uribe has publicly lashed out at journalists digging into his past, forcing some to flee the country amid ensuing death threats. Now, it would seem, legal issues, and not merely personal honor, are at stake.This explains, at least in part, Uribe’s confrontations with the Supreme Court, whose authority he has repeatedly attempted to undermine in order to obtain political status for paramilitary commanders looking to whitewash their criminal pasts. As Senator Gustavo Petro highlighted in 2005 during debates about the Justice and Peace law regulating paramilitary demobilization, there is reason to believe that Uribe aims to protect family members from future prosecution with its passage. During the parliamentary debates about parapol韙ica in March 2007, Petro named Antioquia under governor Uribe (1995-97) as the birthplace of modern-day paramilitarism. Any investigation of its roots would need to begin there.Claudia L髉ez, co-author of the most comprehensive scholarly study of paramilitary penetration of local and regional politics in Colombia between 2002 and 2006, recently remarked on the extent to which, especially compared to the Caribbean coast, parapol韙ica investigations have stalled in Uribe’s native Antioquia. This is to be expected, as there is undoubtedly much to hide: Under Uribe’s watch, paramilitary activity-along with murders and disappearances of thousands of suspected guerrillas-skyrocketed to record levels through close coordination with the military and provincial government officials.Though Uribe has made numerous tours of Europe and the U.S. in order to sell peace with the paramilitaries and war with the FARC, the parapol韙ica scandal has become his Achilles heel. A number of leading Democrats and not a few Republican congresspersons are wary of a trade agreement with Colombia, given human rights conditions and lingering doubts about the president’s ties to paramilitaries. In May 2007, Rep. Nancy Pelosi, leader of the House Foreign Relations Committee, reprimanded Uribe and sent him home empty-handed when he tried to sidestep the issues in Washington. Because of ties to organized labor, Hillary Clinton has kept her distance from him in this electoral season, while Al Gore refused to attend an event in Miami last year that Uribe was scheduled to attend. (Unsurprisingly, Bill Clinton has been less circumspect, hob-knobbing with Uribe at an event called Colombia is Passion in New York City in May.)A bilateral free trade agreement with the U.S. has been one of Uribe’s chief goals since coming to power in 2002, but it appears increasingly remote. European countries, meanwhile, are reluctant to contribute funds for war with the FARC or peace with paramilitaries, and their meager offers of development aid are of little import to him.Ch醰ez, Reyes, and the HostagesUribe has also been increasingly cornered by the foreign policy of Venezuelan president Hugo Ch醰ez. In what constitutes the major achievement by a Latin American statesperson in recent memory, after months of negotiations (sanctioned by President Uribe), in January and February of this year Ch醰ez convinced the FARC to turn over six hostages to his government-all of them former politicians who, upon release, began agitating for the release of the rest of the prisoners, particularly Ingrid Betancourt, a center-left politician with dual French-Colombian citizenship.Betancourt’s family, together with human rights organizations and NGOs, have mounted a relatively successful campaign of public awareness and political pressure in France: President Sarkozy’s government has reiterated its commitment to free Betancourt, acknowledging the positive role Ch醰ez and the Venezuelan government have played thus far. For Uribe, such meddling strengthens FARC diplomacy in Europe, which is why he wanted Reyes dead. In Uribe’s eyes, Reyes and the FARC paved the way for Betancourt’s family and European NGO’s to damage his image and undermine his policy of war as peace. In 2001, as part of the FARC’s peace process with former president André–Ÿ Pastrana, Reyes toured Europe and deepened existing ties to European governments and NGOs. As recently declassified documents obtained by the non-governmental National Security Archive demonstrate, in 1998 Reyes established contact with a U.S. diplomatic mission in Costa Rica led by Philip T. Chicola, then director of the State Department’s Office of Andean Affairs. For all intents and purposes, Reyes was the FARC’s ambassador.For Uribe, then, Reyes was a rival, a competitor, and according to the mafia rules that govern politics in Colombia, such people must die. There were scores to be settled: it was Reyes and the FARC who, in the mid-1990s, convinced allies in European government and society that Uribe’s security policies in Antioquia were unacceptable in terms of human rights and international law. And it was Reyes and his pals (no women were invited) who charmed European politicians and solidarity groups in Europe in 2001. This set the stage for Uribe’s damaged credibility in Europe after 2002. Since then, Reyes has presented his organization’s position before the European Parliament: prisoner exchanges that lead to a negotiated peace settlement. There is strong support for such a policy in official European circles.Reyes was not a charismatic leader, nor is Manuel Sureshot Marulanda, who has led the FARC since it was founded in 1966. The FARC does not depend on charismatic individuals for its survival. More important than Reyes or Marulanda to FARC coffers was Tom醩 Medina Caracas, alias Negro Acacio, a former public school teacher who became the first FARC commander wanted for extradition to the U.S. after September 11, 2001, on charges of cocaine trafficking. At the time of Medina’s death in September 2007, much was made of the putative blow it represented to the FARC, as Medina was the group’s answer to Pablo Escobar, managing cocaine routes and protection rackets through Venezuela, Brazil, and the Guyanas. Since Medina’s death, no one has mentioned him again, and it would be surprising if his routes had been disrupted or destroyed without proper media fanfare. At the time of his death, seasoned commentators were quick to note that as a matter of policy, the FARC have at least three people ready to take the place of someone like Medina at a moment’s notice. As Fernando Cubides has argued, the FARC is an armed bureaucracy.Thus there is no shortage of trained personnel to keep the war machine running, and it is unlikely that the killing of Ra鷏 Reyes will make much of a dent in its functioning, except in terms of negotiating the release of the remaining hostages and laying the foundation for a negotiated peace; in terms of politics rather than total war. This explains the reaction of French Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner, who said, It is bad news that the man we were talking to, with whom we had contacts, has been killed. Do you see how ugly the world is?It may tempting to dismiss Kouchner’s question, but his point may be somewhat more subtle: namely, that Uribe killed Reyes in a deliberate effort to block the French government from negotiating the release of Ingrid Betancourt. Were Betancourt to be freed, Uribe would likely come under international pressure to grant the FARC political status as a pre-condition for a negotiated political settlement, and might have to contend with Betancourt’s efforts to build a broad anti-Uribe coalition at home and abroad.It is doubtful that the United States was directly involved in killing Reyes, since Plan Colombia was specifically designed to give the Colombian government the hardware, surveillance, and training to carry out such missions on its own. The Bush administration, of course, has greeted the death of a top FARC terrorist with glee, legal niceties and political subtleties aside. Uribe does not appear to have asked permission to pursue Reyes into Ecuador, but in light of past episodes, he had little reason to fear a reprimand from Washington, and was likely emboldened by past precedent. Whether Washington gives the green light beforehand matters little, as long as Uribe’s moves are sanctioned ex post facto, as they were on March 4.High Stakes in the AndesEcuadorian and Venezuelan government responses came quickly and unequivocally: within 48 hours, both broke off all diplomatic ties with Colombia and moved troops, tanks, and planes to their borders. Ecuadorian President Rafael Correa explained that in addition to the efforts of Sarkozy and Ch醰ez, his government had been working on the liberation of 12 hostages-including Ingrid Betancourt and three U.S. mercenaries-at the time Reyes was assassinated. He added negotiations were at an advanced stage. Ch醰ez jumped in and labeled Uribe a criminal, mafioso, paramilitary in charge of a narco-government. In one of his more restrained remarks, the Venezuelan president said, It is very serious that a country arrogates to itself the right to bomb the territory of a neighbor and commit an incursion to take bodies, violating many international laws. Think of the consequences, not just for Colombia, but for your neighbors.Predictably, Uribe engaged in an almost surreal effort to re-create the atmosphere of the build-up to the U.S. occupation of Iraq. The smoking gun was Reyes’ laptop, reportedly recovered at the scene. Head of Colombia’s National Police, Gen. Oscar Naranjo alleged that the FARC had been plotting to get uranium for a dirty bomb: When they mention negotiations for 50 kilos of uranium, this means that the FARC are taking big steps in the world of terrorism to become a global aggressor. We’re not talking of domestic guerrillas but transnational terrorism. On March 4, the Colombian government announced that the FARC was building a dirty bomb. All of this would seem to be a transparent attempt to convince the U.S. government and the rest of the world that the incident-and the region-can be neatly slotted into the global war on terror.Though allegations have cropped up repeatedly, as ideologically needed, since Ch醰ez came to power in 1998, no one has ever documented illicit ties between Ch醰ez and the FARC; the Uribe government is apparently now free to invent them. Another item recovered from Reyes’ hard drive purportedly demonstrates that the FARC received $300 million in payments from Ch醰ez as recently as February. To Gen. Naranjo, this suggested clear proof of an armed alliance between the FARC and the Venezuelan government. A third item allegedly contains a thank-you note from Ch醰ez during his stint in prison after his failed coup attempt in 1992. Given the advanced division of labor within the FARC, it would be odd indeed if its ambassador kept such delicate-and, in the case of the prison letter from Ch醰ez, dated-information so readily accessible. For good measure, the Colombian government also alleged that recovered documents linked the Ecuadorian government to the FARC.The Venezuelan government was not fazed. Vice president Ram髇 Carrizales said, We are accustomed to the lies of the Colombian government. Whatever they say has no importance. They can invent anything now to try to get out of that violation of Ecuadorian territory that they committed. President Correa met with his cabinet to inform them of his government’s position: They said we had a pact with terrorists, and that is completely false. We are dealing with an extremely cynical government.Perhaps the most hopeful development to arise out of the whole morass is the new multilateralism in South America: the regional powers, Chile and Brazil, demanded an official apology from Colombia to Ecuador, and were followed by Argentina, Bolivia, and Peru; all countries were eager to find a peaceful solution through the Organization of American States (OAS).There is even more diplomatic unity against Uribe than there was when he supported the U.S.-preferred candidate for Secretary General of the OAS in 2005. That was the first time since the organization was founded in Bogot?in 1948 under the watchful eye of Secretary of State George Marshall that the U.S. candidate did not win. In dealing with Uribe’s incursion, South American countries may well make another end run around the U.S. and Colombia through the OAS, and at the very least, foreign ministers have agreed to conduct an investigation. Ch醰ez has proposed to revive the Contadora group of countries whose governments helped broker peace agreements in Central America in the 1990s in spite of U.S. government obstructionism. The latest violation of Ecuadorian sovereignty could convince other South American countries of the need for such a group.Poster for victims’ march: Memory and Dignity for the Displaced, the Murdered, the Disappeared, the Victims.The protest march called for tomorrow, March 6, in Colombia and the world to commemorate the victims of paramilitary and state violence will be a test of the political temperature. A range of sectors have promised to participate: trade unions, human rights groups, families of the kidnapped and disappeared, women’s and neighborhood organizations, peasant, Afro-Colombian, indigenous, and student groups. If this push for truth, justice, and a negotiated peace finds an echo in multilateral diplomatic initiatives, Uribe could find himself cornered yet again; a frightening prospect, unless progressive forces in the hemisphere prove strong enough to contain him and his northern patr髇.–Forrest Hylton is the author of Evil

Hour in Colombia (Verso, 2006), and with Sinclair Thomson,

of Revolutionary

Horizons: Past and Present in Bolivian Politics (Verso, 2007).

He is a frequent contributor to NACLA,

where this essay originally appeared.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Related posts

No grudges

Wednesday, March 5th, 2008

My grievances with the police originated from incidents awhile back, none of which culminated in an arrest or traffic citation. Check courthouse records if you have any doubt. Any misconduct directed at me by another citizen I let go in one ear and out the other, unless it is the same individual with an emerging pattern - in which case I notify private legal counsel and the police.

But, misconduct by a police officer toward a citizen either directly or behind the citizen’s back, leaves a lasting impression, and a grudge. No cop can afford to have a private citizen harboring a grudge.

In this case, I felt I was a bit harsh on the police, and I made a point of contacting Police Chief Dan Luttenegger by telephone, and he was not happy to say the least, about my letter. Neither were several other officers. There were no sharp words exchanged between Chief Luttenegger and myself. In fact, our conversation ended amiably.

My unstinting support for law enforcement qualifies any criticisms I have, especially after reading a commentary by Lt. Col. Bob Brown, CEO and editor of Soldier of Fortune magazine, who holds the same qualifications and policy.

I had second thoughts about my letter of Feb. 23, and notified The Hawk Eye by email and telephone to “kill” the letter before publication, but it slipped through the cracks.

To the other readers who write into the paper, I won’t be making your problem my “problem” so-to-speak no matter how noble or just the cause may be, with one notable exception: if it is an exceptionally egregious situation beyond even the most hard-core.

ROBERT COBRETTI

Burlington

Tags: ,

Related posts

The Farm at Cape Kidnappers

Monday, March 3rd, 2008

Our first impression of The Farm at Cape Kidnappers wasn%26#39;t the sweeping view over the Pacific and Hawke%26#39;s Bay, spectacular as it was, or the classy but comfortable decor, or even the Colin McCahon in one of the luxurious sitting rooms. Nope, it was the sheep. Everywhere we looked from the dining rooms to the bathrooms were statues and photographs of sheep. The American owners haven%26#39;t spent their entire lives listening to sheep jokes. My husband and I, however, couldn%26#39;t get over the delicious irony of sharing our five-star surrounds with the animal that has done more to knock our national pride than any other. But it all makes sense once you realise The Farm is just that a working sheep and cattle farm.
The Farm at Cape Kidnappers bills itself as the country%26#39;s newest world-class lodge. But what does world-class really mean? Considering this was my first stay at a world-class lodge, I%26#39;ll hazard a guess at a sumptuous and harmonious combination of food, service, amenities, accommodation, facilities and location that caresses you like a cashmere wrap, satisfies your every desire for comfort and pleasure, and inspires you to try to achieve some of that perfection in your everyday life. Or something like that.
The Farm is owned and developed by Julian one of Wall Street%26#39;s original hedge fund legends and Josie Robertson. Like its sister property, Kauri Cliffs in Northland, The Farm also has its own 18-hole golf course, which has already been named one of the world%26#39;s top courses. The lodge and accommodation sit atop a ridge on the cape, about 20 minutes by private road through forests, farmland and river valleys. Which may be why our sense of anticipation somewhat overshadowed our first sight of what appeared to be a tidy scattering of buildings that wouldn%26#39;t look out of place on a well-heeled high country station. Which, of course, is exactly the desired effect.
Waiting to meet us at the door are Peyton, a pleasant and preppy American from Richmond, Virginia, and Adrian, a former sous chef who moved up the hill from his last job at local winery Te Awa (another Robertson investment), who turns out to be one of The Farm%26#39;s real treasures. Peyton leads us on a quick tour of the lodge, which reveals the luxury behind the low-key exterior. From the dining room with its huge Dick Frizzell painting, to the sitting rooms and lounges, it%26#39;s all comfort and class. And to our huge relief, not in the least overwhelming.
A snug housed in what looks like a grain silo makes you yearn for winter, with its throws draped over leather couches, sheepskin-clad ottomans and large fireplace. Next door, you can watch DVDs or curl up with a sumptuous coffee-table book while snuggled up on a sofa under a Colin McCahon, while a chandelier crafted from deer antlers adds a witty touch to yet another lounge. We%26#39;re taken across to our room by golf cart, via a quick detour past the spa (perfect for golfing widows) and pool. The suite is airy, private and, with views over farmland to the Pacific, serenely peaceful. Distractions include a mini-bar from which all but the alcohol is complimentary, wireless internet, iPod dock, a large flat-screen television hiding behind a photograph of the cape, and a bed big enough to feel like you need a map to find your way out of it.
Because we%26#39;re not golfers and probably the only guests who aren%26#39;t, I end up sharing the swimming pool on one of the summer%26#39;s nicest days with only dragonflies and bumblebees. It%26#39;s not until dinner that more guests appear mostly Americans, some Europeans. Some discreet eavesdropping reveals their table talk features much talks of ups and downs of their golf handicaps and their stock portfolios. But we%26#39;re more interested in what our waiter Richard has to say. With a CV boasting stints at Heston Blumenthal%26#39;s legendary Fat Duck at Bray, in Berkshire and, closer to home, Vinnie%26#39;s in Auckland, he%26#39;s as knowledgeable about what%26#39;s being put in front of us as he is friendly and if he picks us as atypical (ie, not even remotely moneyed) guests, he never lets on. Our menu it changes daily depending on what takes chef%26#39;s fancy offers up an intrinsically New Zealand offering: Hawke%26#39;s Bay lamb, crayfish from Otago, quail farmed south of Auckland and locally caught fish and paua. Suddenly my husband an avowed steak man who never ever orders fish is waxing lyrical over the John Dory served with tiger prawns, calling it one of the best meals he%26#39;s ever eaten, and I%26#39;m seeing paua in a whole new not-grossed-out light.
Even better, you don%26#39;t have to worry about what each mouthful is costing as dinner (and breakfast) is included in the tariff. (Speaking of which, if you%26#39;re tempted but not the possessor of a bulletproof bank account, note that low season at The Farm runs from May 1 to September 30.)
So far, so very, very good but it%26#39;s not until the next morning that we really discover just how special this place is. Now normally, I%26#39;d rather spend a Sunday morning in bed than driving around a farm, especially when the kids are amusing their grandparents hundreds of kilometres away, but this turned out to be altogether something else.
With Adrian as our driver and guide, we spent an hour and a half traversing some of the farm%26#39;s 2500ha. Adrian%26#39;s not from one of the local iwi but he%26#39;s incredibly well-versed in the area%26#39;s long and colourful history and although his take on it might not be what you read in most history books, he%26#39;s probably closer to the truth, as well as being enormously funny with it. (It helps when you%26#39;ve got a giggle like BillyTJames.) He takes us to a pa site one of 12 pa and 38 archeological sites on the property which sits high above the ocean; the cliffs on three sides helping to avoid invaders for centuries. It%26#39;s probably been 150 years since Maori lived there but it%26#39;s impossible not to feel their presence.
Along the way, we pass what%26#39;s been dubbed The Great Wall of Hawke%26#39;s Bay, the 2.5m-high, 13km-long predator-free fence the Robinsons have built across the property, with the admirable goal of being able to one day introduce kiwi, tuatara and native birds. Then it%26#39;s off to the gannet colony on the very tip of the cape. It%26#39;s not the fenced-off public area that%26#39;s further around the cape but The Farm%26#39;s very own private viewing spot. The smell hits you first but that%26#39;s quickly dissipated by the wonderful sight of hundreds of gannets, including dozens of fluffy grey chicks, within arm%26#39;s reach.
An hour later, on our way back to the airport, we try to work out what to make of our 24 hours of world-class life. Every box was ticked when it came to comfort and pleasure but I guess there are hundreds, if not thousands, of other places in the world than can deliver that. But it was the things money can%26#39;t buy that would make me go back to The Farm. And, of course, the sheep.

Tags: , , , , ,

Related posts

Hunting as a team

Friday, February 15th, 2008

%26bull; The deer hunters

I meet 59-year-old Jeff Carter, one of the most experienced southern hunters in the game.
Carter%26#39;s weather beaten face tells the story of a man whose life has been spent outdoors.
Not surprisingly it%26#39;s here he says he wants to die, among the unspoilt natural wilderness of New Zealand%26#39;s largest national park.
%26quot;I love the mountains. I love the deer.%26quot; %26quot;There%26#39;s something that grabs me, I just love it that much,%26quot; he says.
It%26#39;s here Carter and helicopter pilot Dick Deaker have forged a 36-year career out of scouring the rugged mountain ranges of the Fiordland National Park in pursuit of wild deer.
Their uncanny ability to spot and shoot deer all the while manoeuvering through sometimes treacherous and tricky terrain, makes for a formidable team.
They are survivors in the truest sense of the word.
Through bulldogging, live capture, and helicopter shooting they have prospered where others haven%26#39;t.
Deaker got his start behind the controls of a chopper under the guidance of Sir Tim Wallis%26#39; company Alpine Helicopters during the venison recovery years of the 60s.
The industry ended the unchecked growth of the animal which had multipled since being introduced by European settlers in the 1800s.
Deer shooting is a good lifestyle, but the outdoors can be a horrible place to be too, Deaker explains.
He%26#39;s lost friends here %26mdash; 11 pilots and 16 crewmen have died in Fiordland in the past 20 years, and he%26#39;s had a few close calls himself .
While many of their deaths have been the result of human error, all of them serve as a haunting reminder of the perils of flying, even for the most experienced of helicopter pilots.
The landscape, while beautiful can be just as unforgiving.
%26quot;If I%26#39;m going out and the weather%26#39;s no good, we just go home again,%26quot; Deaker says.
%26quot;Tomorrow%26#39;s another day. You don%26#39;t have to work all day and all night and take risks,%26quot; he said.
Carter recalls an incident where Deaker was forced to ditch his helicopter after an engine failure in the Seaforth Valley.
%26quot;The warning horn came on in the half dark and all I could see was this flash of light — I knew then it was going to be a bad day,%26quot; he says.
Skill, determination, experience, guts and a bit of luck count for a lot in this industry.
Carter uses the analogy of a top level sportsman to draw a comparison.
%26quot;You%26#39;re like an All Black, you%26#39;re only as good as your last game,%26quot; he says.
During one of their last shoots the men sent 40 deer to a venison plant in Mid-Canterbury %26mdash; today they are looking to add to that tally.
So far so good.
It%26#39;s just after 10am and Carter returns to base with a trailerload of deer carcasses from a shoot at the head of the Upukeroa earlier that morning.
His bloodied hands reveal one of the more grizzly aspects of his